Technical University of Moldova - UTM vs Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University - ЧНУ ChNU vs Dong Do University vs Waynesburg University vs Azerbaijani University of Languages

Side-by-side comparison from 14 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Technical University of Moldova - UTM: wins 0/5 categories
Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University - ЧНУ ChNU: wins 0/5 categories
Dong Do University: wins 0/5 categories
Waynesburg University: wins 0/5 categories
Azerbaijani University of Languages: wins 0/5 categories
Ewha Womans University: wins 3/5 categories
Universidad Nacional del Sur - UNS: wins 2/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Computer Science
Hanoi, Vietnam
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Waynesburg, Pennsylvania, United States
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Seoul, South Korea
5.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Arts in Social Science
Best programme: Accounting and Economics
Category ratings
Facilities
3.75
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Win
3.00
Location
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.50
Win
4.00
Professors
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Internationality
2.75
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.50
5.00
Win
Student life
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
Value
3.75
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Accommodation
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.50
4.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Quality education with knowledgeable and inspiring faculty
  • +Opportunities for extracurricular involvement and scientific activities
  • +Well-equipped facilities including advanced laboratories and gyms

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Rich tradition and embedded historical legacy
  • +Inspiring and beautiful campus architecture and atmosphere
  • +Passionate and curious community fostering learning and growth
  • +Rigorous academic standards and prestige
  • +Forefront of research nationwide
  • +Pride in attending a challenging institution
Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and teaching methods.
  • -Poor teaching quality and outdated faculty.
  • -Limited options and external interference.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a major drawback.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is prevalent.
  • -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and lack of support.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep of campus infrastructure.
  • -Limited course offerings and inflexible academic policies.
Rating summary
What students say

This university demonstrates notable strengths, particularly in its **location** and **student life**, both earning high marks of 4. Professors also received a strong rating of 4. Areas requiring improvement include accommodation, scoring 3, and its internationality, which received the lowest rating at 2.75. The university also offers a solid value proposition and good facilities.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This university receives excellent marks in several key areas, with professors, student life, and value all earning a perfect 5. Its location and internationality are also highly regarded, scoring 4.5. Facilities are rated well at 4. The primary area for improvement is accommodation, which received a 3.5 rating.

This institution excels in several key areas, notably achieving perfect scores for **Professors** and **Internationality**, and a perfect score for **Value**. Areas with strong positive feedback include **Location**, **Student Life**, and **Accomodation**, all receiving a 4. The only area receiving a lower rating, though still positive, is **Facilities** at 3.

Reviews summary
Highlights

~55% of reviews are positive, highlighting extracurriculars, good professors, and advanced labs. ~9% express dissatisfaction with teaching quality and faculty, noting limited alternatives. The average rating is 3.73/5.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With a 5/5 average rating from two reviews, feedback is ~100% positive. Students highlight tradition, striking architecture, and a vibrant campus culture, fostering passion and a drive to learn.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, the sole review indicates strong satisfaction. This feedback highlights rigorous academics and prestige, suggesting approximately 100% positive sentiment.

Rating distribution
5★
27%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
100%
4★
27%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
36%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
9%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
University with old material

UTM teaches old materials in the IT field, every day this world is developing and UTM all but not so fast that the technologies that appear every day. There is too much material in the study program that takes a lot of time to study, and students fail to understand normally the field they are taught.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close