Curtin University vs RMIT University vs James Cook University vs The University of Western Australia vs Monash University

Side-by-side comparison from 302 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Le Cordon Bleu Paris (4.60)
Curtin University: wins 2/7 categories
RMIT University: wins 0/7 categories
James Cook University: wins 1/7 categories
The University of Western Australia: wins 0/7 categories
Monash University: wins 0/7 categories
Le Cordon Bleu Paris: wins 4/7 categories
Roffey Park Institute: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Perth, Australia
4.40
Read more reviews
35 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
Melbourne, Australia
4.10
Read more reviews
100 reviews
×
Best programme: Business
Townsville, Australia
4.00
Read more reviews
39 reviews
×
Best programme: Arts
Best programme: Biomedical Science
Melbourne, Australia
4.30
Read more reviews
87 reviews
×
Best programme: Public Health
4.60
Top
Read more reviews
8 reviews
×
Best programme: Culinary Arts
Horsham, Australia
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.42
4.27
4.32
4.15
4.34
4.50
Win
Not rated
Location
4.06
4.14
4.32
4.00
4.07
4.75
Win
Not rated
Professors
4.29
4.48
4.18
3.97
4.48
4.63
Win
Not rated
Internationality
4.38
4.11
4.33
4.09
4.49
4.63
Win
Not rated
Student life
4.33
Win
4.07
4.30
3.97
4.15
3.88
Not rated
Value
4.41
Win
4.22
4.13
4.06
4.25
4.13
Not rated
Accommodation
3.88
3.89
4.21
Win
3.67
3.74
3.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical, hands-on learning and skill development
  • +Industry-relevant curriculum and experienced faculty
  • +Strong global reputation and graduate employment satisfaction
  • +Practical and industry-focused learning
  • +Real-world experience from professors
  • +Engaging and relevant coursework
  • +Dedicated teachers and practical teaching methods
  • +Modern facilities and engaging learning environment
  • +Strong academic focus and research-led approach
  • +Excellent curriculum and faculty support
  • +Strong community, diversity, and inclusion
  • +Abundant resources and engaging campus life
  • +Excellent faculty and high-quality teaching
  • +Modern facilities and vibrant campus environment
  • +Strong support services and personal development opportunities
  • +Exceptional chef instructors and curriculum quality.
  • +Strong emphasis on skill development and practical experience.
  • +Valuable international reputation and alumni network.

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Inefficient and unhelpful administrative processes.
  • -Lack of engagement and poor communication from instructors.
  • -Outdated resources and uninspiring learning environments.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant student frustration and lack of support.
  • -Industrial action negatively impacts students with delayed feedback and limited staff assistance.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a consistent complaint.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support from instructors are frequently mentioned.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are a significant concern.
  • -Administrative inefficiencies and poor communication create frustration.
  • -Lack of engaging teaching methods and relevant curriculum is a common complaint.
  • -Underwhelming and outdated course content with a lack of practical application.
  • -Limited career opportunities and support services as advertised.
  • -Perceived cost-cutting measures impacting essential program components.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment.
  • -Poor communication and administrative support.
  • -Lack of practical application and relevance in coursework.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution receives high marks in several key areas, with **Facilities** and **Value** standing out as its strongest performers. **Student Life**, **Internationality**, and **Professors** also earned very positive reviews. The university's **Location** is rated well, though not as highly as its top-scoring categories. **Accommodations** received the lowest score among the surveyed aspects, indicating a potential area for improvement.

Professors stand out as the university's strongest asset, earning a stellar 4.477 rating. Facilities and Value also received favorable scores above 4.2. The lowest-rated aspect, however, is Accommodation, coming in at 3.886. Overall, the institution demonstrates a solid reputation, particularly in its academic and financial offerings.

This institution garners high marks across multiple aspects, with **Internationality** standing out as the strongest area at 4.33. **Facilities** and **Location** also received excellent scores, both around 4.32. The university demonstrates solid performance in **Student Life** (4.30) and **Accomodation** (4.21). **Value** emerges as the comparatively weakest area, though still rated positively at 4.13, closely followed by **Professors** at 4.18.

Across various aspects, this university demonstrates a generally positive reception. Facilities stand out as a particular strength, earning the highest rating. Student life and professors also receive commendable scores, as does internationality and value. Location is rated consistently well. The weakest area, though still respectable, is accommodation.

This university receives high marks, particularly in **Internationality (4.49)** and **Professors (4.48)**. Facilities and Student Life also score well, indicating a positive overall experience. The weakest area appears to be **Accomodation**, with a rating of 3.74, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Value for money is rated favorably at 4.25.

Performance varies across key aspects of university life. Outstanding ratings were awarded for Location (4.75) and Professors (4.625), alongside strong marks for Internationality (4.625) and Facilities (4.5). Student Life (3.875) and Value (4.125) received good scores. Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~92% of feedback), with students praising experienced faculty and practical, industry-relevant curriculum. There is minimal negative feedback.

Approximately 96% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical, industry-focused learning and experienced faculty. A small percentage (~3%) mention administrative issues and industrial action impacting studies.

Approximately 92% of reviews are positive, praising committed teachers, modern amenities, and an active campus community that foster valuable education and critical thinking. No negative reviews were recorded.

With an average rating of 4.09/5, ~82% of reviews are positive. Students highlight strong academics, excellent facilities, and a supportive community with accessible resources and diverse inclusion. No negative feedback was recorded.

The vast majority of reviews are positive (~93%), highlighting knowledgeable faculty, excellent facilities, and diverse programs. A small portion of feedback (~3.5%) mentions cost-cutting, underwhelming course content, and a lack of practical application.

All eight student reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.63/5. Students highly praise the knowledgeable instructors, quality curriculum, and enriching learning experience.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
46%
20%
3%
27%
44%
63%
0%
4★
49%
76%
92%
55%
49%
38%
0%
3★
6%
1%
5%
18%
3%
0%
0%
2★
0%
1%
0%
0%
3%
0%
0%
1★
0%
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Career-supportive!

Curtin University is greta for those who are very "career-centric"; the university itself places great emphasis on how to find internships and jobs and are very supportive in that regard. The university is also one that places importance on social networking, whether that be through clubs, discord servers and affordable or free social events. One thing I do dislike however is the disorganisation in some courses or how little spaces there can be for classes (this might be specific to my major/course though). Overall I have enjoyed my time here so far.

Money masters

Unfortunately, I had to go to RMIT University in Australia, and I have to admit that it was the most disappointing and unpleasant experience of my life. It was immediately apparent that this establishment was not at all what it purported to be—a prominent university. First and foremost, dealing with the RMIT administration is a complete headache. They are uncoordinated, unresponsive, and don't appear to care about genuinely assisting kids in succeeding. I had to wait weeks for a simple inquiry to be resolved, and even then, the answers I got were sometimes wrong or conflicting. The quality of education at RMIT is also severely lacking. Many of the professors are disinterested and seem to have no real passion for teaching. The curriculum is outdated, and the coursework often feels irrelevant to real-world applications. It's clear that the university is more concerned with making a profit than actually providing a quality education. The facilities at RMIT are in a sorry state as well. The classrooms are cramped and outdated, and the library is sorely lacking in resources. It's as if the university is stuck in the past and has no interest in investing in modern facilities for its students. Perhaps the most frustrating aspect of my time at RMIT was the lack of support for students. There is a complete lack of career services and guidance for students looking to enter the job market. It's as if the university expects you to figure it all out on your own. In summary, I would strongly advise anyone considering RMIT University in Australia to think twice. The administration is a mess, the education is subpar, and the lack of support for students is disheartening. Save yourself the time, money, and frustration and look elsewhere for your education.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Courses

The degree matched its expectation and was in line with goals set before starting the degree. The most important aspect of the degree was to build the latest skills in my domain and be able to interact with the industry. Both of these were well provided by the university. Would definitely recommend it to others.

Student in 2013

I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close