Universidad Externado de Colombia - UEC vs The Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus - Senftenberg vs Brunel Business School vs Federal Polytechnic Nekede - FPNO vs Sir Syed University of Engineering and Technology - SSUET
Side-by-side comparison from 78 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High-quality, specialized programs
- +Excellent professors and diverse student body
- +Opportunities for international experience and professional growth
- +Research opportunities and multidisciplinary approach
- +Knowledgeable faculty and helpful staff
- +Student-friendly city and proximity to Berlin
- +Applied learning and relevant coursework
- +Strong employability and career support
- +Flexible schedules and learning resources
- +Passionate, knowledgeable, and helpful lecturers
- +Conducive learning environment and practical-based courses
- +Effective teaching methods and dedicated faculty
- +Practical, field-relevant education and skill enhancement
- +Cooperative and supportive faculty
- +Strong academic foundation and professional development
- +High-quality, engaging academic programs and knowledgeable faculty.
- +Supportive learning environment with responsive administration and modern facilities.
- +Opportunities for skill development through extracurricular activities.
- +Flexible distance learning options
- +Supportive faculty and staff
- +Accessible and affordable education
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently criticized.
- -Lack of support and unclear communication contribute to student dissatisfaction.
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of progression
- -Administrative and management issues
- -Insufficient teachers and coordination
- -Unclear communication and bureaucratic processes.
- -Lack of modern resources and support.
- -Outdated facilities and infrastructure.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep detract from the learning environment.
- -Lack of support for student well-being and mental health is a major concern.
- -Administrative and management issues create frustration and inefficiency.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder effective learning.
- -Lack of support and communication from faculty and staff is a significant problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of support and unclear communication are common complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a significant concern.
- -Limited resources and support hinder academic progress.
This institution demonstrates very strong performance, with its highest marks awarded to Professors (4.69) and its Facilities and Value (both 4.62). Location and Student Life also received excellent scores (4.54). The area with the lowest rating, though still respectable, is Internationality (4.31), followed closely by Accomodation (4.42).
The university presents a strong overall performance, particularly excelling in Internationality with a rating of 4.58. Student Life and Value also received high marks. Its weakest area, comparatively, is Location, scoring 3.58. Facilities, Professors, and Accommodation are all rated positively, indicating a well-rounded educational experience.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its faculty, with professors receiving a high rating of 4.29. Student life also scores well at 4.08, alongside a strong internationality rating of 4.14. Value for money is rated at a solid 4.0. Conversely, location appears to be the least favored aspect, scoring 3.25. Facilities are moderately rated at 3.85, and accommodation also receives a respectable 3.79.
This university garners a strong score in Student Life, reaching 4.18, and an even higher mark for Value at 4.36, indicating excellent perceived return on investment. Conversely, Accomodation, rated at 3.62, and Internationality, at 3.55, represent the areas with the lowest scores among the surveyed categories. Other aspects like Facilities, Professors, and Location fall within a similar, moderately positive range.
This institution demonstrates a strong performance across several key areas, with student life receiving the highest marks at 4.75. Professors are also highly regarded, scoring 4.4. Facilities and internationality are rated at a solid 4, while location and value also present favorable scores. The weakest area identified is accommodation, which received a rating of 3.5.
This university garners strong ratings across most aspects. Value for money stands out as its strongest area, with exceptionally high marks. Facilities, professors, and student life also received very favorable scores. Areas for potential improvement include internationality, which is rated lower than other categories, and accommodation, while good, scored slightly below the highest performing areas.
Exceptional scores across the board indicate a highly regarded institution. All surveyed areas, including facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, received a perfect rating of 5. This suggests no single area stands out as significantly stronger or weaker than the others, presenting a uniformly excellent experience for students.
With a 4.61 average rating, students praise its quality programs, excellent facilities, and international opportunities for professional growth. No negative feedback was recorded among the 18 reviews.
With a 4/5 average rating from 12 reviews, ~83% of feedback is positive, praising multidisciplinary, research-oriented programs and helpful staff. ~8.3% of reviews are negative, citing issues with program progression and teaching quality.
With an average rating of 4.64/5 from 14 reviews, ~93% are positive. Students praise applied learning, employability skills, and support for international students. There are no negative reviews.
With an average rating of 4.32/5, ~95% of reviews are positive. Students highly recommend the university for its passionate and knowledgeable lecturers, conducive learning environment, and practical-based courses. No negative feedback was received.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with 4 out of 5 reviews giving 4–5 stars. Students highlight good education, cooperative teachers, and a motivating learning environment. There are no negative reviews.
Most (~83%) students praise UEH, highlighting rewarding experiences, a supportive environment with responsive administration, and an engaging curriculum. The ~17% of reviews express satisfaction with high-quality teaching and international standards.
With one review, this university has a perfect 5/5 rating. The single positive review highlights excellent distance learning opportunities, a simple admission process, and helpful study materials. The reviewer also praised the flexibility for balancing education and work, and well-organized examinations.
Nothing to show
I had a scholarship in a joint program to study a master degree in HCSM, I got the opportunity to spend the summer semester of 2019 in Btu in Cottbus, which I can say was an amazing experience, the modules, the professors, and the staff at the campus and the dormitories are very knowledgeable and very helpful, and at the time of the corona the way the university dealt with the pandemic was really impressive, they tried to help us (students) in every way possible, I always tell my friends that the learning experience in Germany is much positively different from any other place in the world.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I Have been working here since July-2012 . I always find motivation & learning paradigm for me . I learnt a lot during these years . My subjects are related to CS , I have seen graduation of almost 11 batches . This programme enhances my skills & confidence . They give me opportunity in different aspects as well , I also supervises various students every year for their FYPs . I am also a female advisor for all the female students.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
