London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs University of East London - UEL vs Queen's University Belfast - QUB vs Bede's Summer School vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris
Side-by-side comparison from 514 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Knowledgeable and approachable faculty
- +High-quality academic programs and clear feedback
- +Excellent facilities and resources
- +Supportive and approachable lecturers
- +Practical, industry-relevant learning
- +Diverse and friendly campus community
- +Practical, hands-on learning experiences
- +Supportive and approachable faculty
- +Valuable real-world experience opportunities
Nothing to show
- +Exceptional teaching quality from passionate, experienced instructors
- +Unmatched precision, emphasis on quality, and professional skill development
- +Welcoming environment, strong support, and valuable alumni network
- +Supportive and accessible staff, fostering a welcoming environment.
- +Flexible course design and resources catering to diverse student needs.
- +Small, community-focused campus with valuable practical experience.
- +Wide module variety and relevant courses
- +Strong student support and opportunities
- +Practical knowledge for career preparation
- -Poor teaching quality and unstructured courses.
- -High fees combined with lack of support and career services.
- -Limited social life and judgmental environment.
- -Ineffective teaching and irrelevant course content.
- -Poor communication and unresponsiveness from staff.
- -Administrative and management issues, including inaccessible amenities and lack of student support.
- -Outdated curriculum and insufficient practical preparation for the workforce.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
- -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from faculty and staff is a recurring problem.
Examining the university's performance reveals a diverse set of scores. The strongest areas are **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving very high marks. **Student Life** stands out as the weakest performing category. Other areas like **Professors**, **Accomodation**, and **Facilities** received solid, above-average ratings, with **Value** also scoring positively.
This institution demonstrates robust performance, particularly excelling in its **Location**, which received the highest rating. **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Internationality** also garnered strong scores. Conversely, **Accomodation** and **Student Life** received comparatively lower ratings, suggesting these areas might benefit from further development. The overall **Value** proposition remains positive.
Across multiple categories, this institution garners favorable reviews. Facilities emerge as a standout area, closely followed by professors and student life, all receiving scores above 4.3. Accommodation and internationality represent the lower end of the spectrum, though still rated positively, with value also falling within the mid-4 range.
Nothing to show
This university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **location** (4.7), **professors** (4.6), and **internationality** (4.6). Students are particularly impressed with the quality of instruction and the global environment. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at 3.0, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Student life and value for money also received moderate scores.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its academic offerings, with professors receiving an outstanding 4.6 rating. Student life also scores well at 3.8. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in accommodation and location, both rated at 3.4 and 3.5 respectively, suggesting these are aspects that could be improved. Facilities and internationality present a solid middle ground, with ratings of 4.2 and 3.7.
This university excels remarkably in several key areas, receiving perfect scores for its facilities, professors, location, and internationality, as well as strong value. However, significant weaknesses are evident in student life and accommodation, both of which are rated at zero.
Approximately 96.6% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable professors, supportive learning environments, and strong academic reputations. A small percentage (around 3.4%) of negative feedback cites issues with lecturing, grading, and course structure.
With an average rating of 4.25/5, approximately 74% of reviews are positive, praising supportive tutors, practical learning, and a diverse environment. Negative feedback (~3.8%) highlights issues with lecturer responsiveness and course relevance.
Most reviews (approximately 98.3%) are positive, highlighting well-structured modules, approachable lecturers, and a welcoming campus environment. A small percentage of feedback noted outdated course content.
Nothing to show
Students highly praise the exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable instructors. Facilities are noted as impeccable and the learning environment welcoming, contributing to professional and personal growth for ~100% of reviewers.
With an average rating of 4.1/5 and ~80% positive feedback, students highlight supportive staff, good study materials, and accommodating environments for diverse needs. Minor points on course content choice were mentioned.
With one review, the average rating is 5/5 stars. The student highlighted access to diverse modules and courses, strong student support, and preparation for the job market. No negative feedback was recorded.
LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.
Nothing to show
The Cloud Computing module was one of the highlights of my course at Queen’s. It covered the fundamentals of AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud in detail. The best part was the group project where we designed and deployed our own cloud-based application. The hands-on experience was invaluable, and the support from the faculty was excellent. I would highly recommend this module to anyone interested in this field.
Nothing to show
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
I liked the respect toward students and modules, and the course was designed to help busy parents and workers. Excellent staff on campus to take care of students' needs and professional tutors. Library and IT lab in our campus, good study material and one to one tuition.
Nothing to show
