London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs University of East London - UEL vs ONCAMPUS Global vs Cass Business School vs University of Roehampton
Side-by-side comparison from 515 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Marketable courses and high academic standards
- +Excellent, expert faculty with industry experience
- +Supportive, respectful, and flexible learning environment
- +Supportive & approachable staff
- +Practical, industry-relevant learning
- +Diverse & friendly community
- +Supportive and approachable lecturers
- +Well-organized courses and learning resources
- +Personal and academic development
- +Engaging professors and effective teaching methods
- +Diverse student body and valuable networking opportunities
- +Strong career services and diverse program specializations
- +Practical experience through placements and hands-on training
- +Supportive and dedicated lecturers
- +Positive campus environment and community feel
- +Industry connections and career readiness
- +Practical, hands-on learning and skill development
- +Inspiring and welcoming creative environment
- +exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable, approachable instructors
- +strong emphasis on precision, quality, and professional skill development
- +welcoming environment and supportive alumni network
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of structure in programs.
- -High fees are not justified by the quality of education and support.
- -Limited social life and inadequate student support services.
- -Administrative and management issues create communication barriers and attendance struggles.
- -Course content lacks relevance and the teaching level is inconsistent.
- -Lack of student support and inaccessible amenities are significant concerns.
- -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited as a source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are a common complaint.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Communication and transparency are frequently lacking.
- -Administrative & management issues are a major source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Lack of support and resources is frequently mentioned.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are a problem.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and course structure is disappointing.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of career support and industry relevance leads to dissatisfaction.
With a strong emphasis on **Internationality** (4.80) and **Location** (4.78), this institution presents a globally connected and well-situated environment. Professors also receive high marks (4.26). Conversely, **Student Life** (3.63) and **Accommodations** (3.79) are the areas with the lowest reported satisfaction, suggesting room for improvement in campus vibrancy and living arrangements.
The university excels in several key areas, with **Location** receiving the highest rating at 4.38, closely followed by **Facilities** (4.34) and **Internationality** (4.27). **Professors** also scored well at 4.26. **Student Life** and **Value** are solid, both above 4.0. The area with the lowest rating is **Accomodation**, scoring 3.36, indicating it is the weakest aspect.
Overall, this institution garners favorable reviews across multiple aspects. The highest-rated areas are Professors (4.75) and Location (4.73), indicating significant strengths in these domains. Conversely, Facilities (4.3) and Accomodation (4.27) received the lowest scores, suggesting these might be areas for potential improvement. Student Life and Internationality also scored highly.
This university garners excellent reviews across most aspects. Its strongest areas are clearly **Location** and **Value**, both scoring a high 4.44 and 4.5 respectively. Professors and student life also receive very positive marks. The weakest area identified is **Accomodation**, which, while still good, sits at a 4.0, slightly below the other categories. Internationality and Facilities are also well-regarded.
Professors and facilities are highly regarded at this institution, earning top marks. Student life and location also receive favorable reviews. While generally positive, accommodation and value represent the areas with the lowest scores, indicating potential for improvement. Internationality is rated solidly in the middle.
The university demonstrates considerable strengths in its **location**, receiving a high rating of 4.33. **Facilities** also score well at 4.17. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 2.92. **Student life** is another area that could see improvement, scoring 3.33. Other aspects like professors, internationality, and value are rated moderately.
This institution receives high marks for its Location, scoring 4.78, and for its Professors and Internationality, both at 4.67. Facilities also rate well at 4.56. Student Life and Value are both solid at 4.00. The weakest area is Accomodation, which received a rating of 3.22.
Most reviews (~74%) praise marketable courses, expert faculty, and excellent research opportunities. Very few (~3.4%) express concerns about teaching quality, grading consistency, and career services.
With a 4.29 average rating, approximately 74% of 104 reviews are positive, highlighting supportive tutors, practical learning, and a friendly campus. A small number of reviews (around 3%) mention limited support and course relevance.
Reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%), highlighting excellent teaching, supportive staff, and well-organized courses that improve language and academic skills. Minor scheduling changes were the only noted inconvenience.
With an average rating of 4.5/5 from 10 reviews, ~90% are positive, highlighting knowledgeable professors, engaging teaching, and valuable career opportunities. No negative feedback was reported.
With an average rating of 4.49/5, ~91% of 45 reviews are positive. Students praise the holistic, evidence-based nursing practice, valuable clinical placements, and supportive environment. Some mention inconsistent mentor support and slow administration.
With ~74% positive feedback, students highlight Ravensbourne's inspirational environment, industry connections, and focus on digital and creative learning. No negative feedback was reported.
All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight exceptional teaching quality and knowledgeable instructors, along with impeccable facilities. The curriculum and emphasis on precision are frequently praised.
LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
