London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs ESCP Business School vs Brunel University London vs ONCAMPUS Global vs Greenwich Business School

Side-by-side comparison from 522 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: ONCAMPUS Global (4.80)
London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE: wins 1/6 categories
ESCP Business School: wins 1/6 categories
Brunel University London: wins 0/6 categories
ONCAMPUS Global: wins 4/6 categories
Greenwich Business School: wins 0/6 categories
London Academy of Trading - LAT: wins 0/6 categories
Le Cordon Bleu Paris: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Economics
Best programme: Bachelor in Management
London, The United Kingdom
4.10
Read more reviews
119 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer Science
London, The United Kingdom
4.80
Top
Read more reviews
20 reviews
×
Best programme: Undergraduate Foundation Programme
London, The United Kingdom
4.30
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Event Management
London, The United Kingdom
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Culinary Arts
Category ratings
Facilities
4.05
4.09
3.98
4.44
Win
4.25
Not rated
4.40
Location
4.78
Win
4.33
3.72
4.74
4.50
Not rated
4.70
Professors
4.26
4.11
4.03
4.75
Win
4.25
Not rated
4.60
Internationality
4.80
4.80
Win
4.33
4.60
4.50
Not rated
4.60
Student life
3.65
4.17
3.83
4.56
Win
4.25
Not rated
3.90
Value
4.05
4.39
4.13
4.50
4.50
Not rated
3.90
Accommodation
3.80
3.27
3.61
4.32
Win
4.00
Not rated
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Knowledgeable and approachable faculty
  • +High-quality academic programs and clear feedback
  • +Excellent facilities and resources
  • +European campuses and multicultural environment
  • +Strong career preparation and top company recruitment
  • +Development of interpersonal and managerial skills
  • +Practical, career-focused learning with industry relevance
  • +Supportive and engaging teaching staff
  • +Accessible campus and useful resources
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Excellent facilities and convenient location
  • +Strong academic and personal development support
  • +Engaging and supportive faculty.
  • +Comprehensive and industry-relevant course content.
  • +Excellent facilities and student life.

Nothing to show

  • +Exceptional teaching quality from passionate, experienced instructors
  • +Unmatched precision, emphasis on quality, and professional skill development
  • +Welcoming environment, strong support, and valuable alumni network
Cons
  • -Poor teaching quality and unstructured courses.
  • -High fees combined with lack of support and career services.
  • -Limited social life and judgmental environment.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor campus infrastructure are a recurring problem.
  • -The curriculum often lacks practical application and relevance.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant concern.
  • -Outdated course content and confusing teaching methods are frustrating.
  • -Poor communication and lack of professionalism are prevalent.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep frustrate students.
  • -Lack of resources and inadequate support services are common complaints.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Inflexible or irrelevant course content is a common complaint.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
  • -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.
Rating summary
What students say

Examining the university's performance reveals a diverse set of scores. The strongest areas are **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving very high marks. **Student Life** stands out as the weakest performing category. Other areas like **Professors**, **Accomodation**, and **Facilities** received solid, above-average ratings, with **Value** also scoring positively.

Across various aspects, this institution shows considerable strengths, particularly in **Internationality**, earning a near-perfect score. **Location** and **Value** also received very high marks. Student life and professors are rated positively, as are facilities. However, the lowest-rated category is **Accomodation**, indicating an area for potential improvement.

This institution garners a strong overall rating, particularly excelling in **Internationality** with a score of 4.33. **Professors** and **Value** also receive high marks. Conversely, **Accomodation** and **Location** present the weakest areas, scoring 3.61 and 3.72 respectively. Facilities, student life, and professors all fall within a commendable 3.8 to 4.0 range.

Overall, the university garners strong ratings across various aspects. Professors are exceptionally well-regarded, achieving the highest score. Location and Internationality also stand out with excellent marks. Student Life, Facilities, and Value also reflect positive sentiment. Accommodation, while still strong, receives the lowest rating among the surveyed categories.

This institution demonstrates strong performance, particularly in its Location and Internationality, both scoring an excellent 4.5. Student Life, Facilities, and Professors also receive commendably high marks at 4.25. Accomodation stands out as a slightly less strong area with a rating of 4, while Value also scores highly at 4.5.

Nothing to show

This university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **location** (4.7), **professors** (4.6), and **internationality** (4.6). Students are particularly impressed with the quality of instruction and the global environment. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at 3.0, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Student life and value for money also received moderate scores.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Approximately 96.6% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable professors, supportive learning environments, and strong academic reputations. A small percentage (around 3.4%) of negative feedback cites issues with lecturing, grading, and course structure.

Approximately 97.6% of reviews are positive, highlighting rewarding experiences, multicultural environments, and personal/professional growth. A single negative review mentioned the EMIB program should be updated.

Over 97% of reviews are positive, highlighting career-focused degrees, practical learning, and supportive lecturers. A small amount of negative feedback mentions visa issues and course content clarity.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~100% of 20 feedback entries rating 4–5 stars. Students praise friendly, supportive teachers, excellent facilities like the library, and effective student support services that build confidence.

University reviews are predominantly positive (~75%), with students highlighting helpful teachers and insightful modules. The student experience is described as memorable and well-supported. No negative feedback was provided.

Nothing to show

Students highly praise the exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable instructors. Facilities are noted as impeccable and the learning environment welcoming, contributing to professional and personal growth for ~100% of reviewers.

Rating distribution
5★
34%
55%
32%
75%
50%
0%
60%
4★
44%
38%
55%
25%
25%
0%
40%
3★
18%
5%
10%
0%
25%
0%
0%
2★
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
1%
2%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Great Experience

LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.

Great international exposure

To me, studying at ESCP has been a really rewarding experience. The multicultural environment helped me grow both personally and professionally. Professors are very supportive and bring real-world insights into the classroom. I rlly liked the flexibility to study in different campuses across Europe. Although some admin processes can be slow, but overall I felt well-prepared for the job market.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Student in 2013

I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close