London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs University of Hertfordshire - UH vs Bournemouth University - BU vs ONCAMPUS Global vs University of Dundee
Side-by-side comparison from 622 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Expert, approachable faculty and high-quality teaching
- +Strong career preparation and marketable skills development
- +Excellent facilities and a supportive learning environment
- +Accessible and supportive staff and services.
- +Engaging course content with practical application.
- +Strong sense of community and enjoyable campus life.
- +Excellent and supportive faculty
- +Modern facilities and campus resources
- +Practical, employability-focused programmes
- +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
- +Excellent facilities and convenient location
- +Strong academic and personal development support
- +Strong staff support and approachability
- +Comprehensive student welfare and financial aid
- +Development of professional confidence and skills
- +Practical, industry-relevant courses and inspiring professors
- +Rich international environment and diverse student body
- +Personal and professional development opportunities
Nothing to show
- -Poor teaching quality and unclear learning expectations.
- -Lack of structure and significant workload.
- -Disappointing careers service and limited social life.
- -Delayed result publication and administrative issues.
- -Poor teaching quality, with professors being unengaged and unapproachable.
- -Poor industry preparation and misleading advertising.
- -Inconvenient transport and outdated facilities.
- -Lack of practical application and awareness of available resources.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep frustrate students.
- -Lack of resources and inadequate support services are common complaints.
- -Inconsistent and unfair grading practices are a major concern.
- -The facility is old and in dire need of an upgrade.
- -Financial concerns and perceived low educational value.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates remarkable strengths in its **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving scores nearing 4.8. **Professors** also score highly at 4.26. Conversely, **Student Life** is the lowest-rated area, with a score of 3.64, followed by **Accomodation** at 3.79. Other aspects like Facilities and Value fall within a solid mid-range.
This institution garners exceptional marks for Internationality, achieving a standout rating. Professors and Facilities also received very strong evaluations, closely followed by Value and Student Life. Conversely, Location and Accommodations represent the areas with the lowest, though still respectable, scores in this review.
The university garners positive feedback across numerous aspects, with Student Life achieving the highest rating at 4.2. Professors and Internationality also score well. In contrast, Accomodation presents the lowest score at 3.91, indicating it's the area with the most room for improvement. Facilities, Location, and Value are all rated around 4.0.
Overall, the university garners strong ratings across various aspects. Professors are exceptionally well-regarded, achieving the highest score. Location and Internationality also stand out with excellent marks. Student Life, Facilities, and Value also reflect positive sentiment. Accommodation, while still strong, receives the lowest rating among the surveyed categories.
Overall, the university garners positive feedback. Student life stands out as the strongest area, followed closely by facilities and value. Location also received favorable reviews. Conversely, accommodation scored the lowest among the surveyed categories, indicating a potential area for improvement. Professor quality and internationality were rated moderately well.
This institution garners excellent marks in several key areas. Facilities, Professors, Internationality, and Value all received high scores of 4.125. Student Life and Accommodations are rated lower, at 3.625 and approximately 3.57 respectively, indicating these are areas with more room for improvement compared to its other strengths. The Location score sits at 3.75.
Nothing to show
Nearly 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting a supportive environment, knowledgeable faculty, and excellent facilities. A small percentage (around 3.4%) mention issues like poor lecturing, inconsistent grading, and lack of social life.
With an average rating of 4.42/5 and 98% positive feedback, students praise a supportive environment, accessible staff, and valuable course content. A small portion (2%) noted issues such as delayed result publication or unengaged professors.
With a 4.08/5 average rating, ~98.6% of reviews are positive, praising modern facilities, supportive staff, and strong academic programs. A small minority (1.4%) noted issues with practical application and transport.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~100% of 20 feedback entries rating 4–5 stars. Students praise friendly, supportive teachers, excellent facilities like the library, and effective student support services that build confidence.
With an average rating of 4.25/5, ~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent staff support, student welfare services, and career guidance. One negative review mentioned inconsistent grading.
Most reviews praise the inspiring professors, practical learning, and international environment, contributing to a ~74% positive sentiment. One review expressed dissatisfaction, calling it a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
Nothing to show
LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.
I can boldly say that today my research skills have improved drastically because of the skills I learnt in UH. UH not only gives you an opportunity to grow, it gives you the necessary exposure as a student. With the experience garnered from UH, you can compete anywhere in the world. The tutors are exceptionally qualified and always ready to guide you through. Adaora Nwaka LLM,Energy Law and the Environment.
I studied the MA 3D Computer Animation at BU. If you are an international student I can't warn you enough about how studying there can be one of the worsts mistakes that you can make in your life. They cherry pick the stories of success. They use the names of the bigs studios for advertising, implicitly or explicitly. They use BFX as an advertising tool for the courses at BU. They say that they will prepare you for the industry in completion of the course, this is absolutely false in my experience. The MA is an introductory course condesed in one year. For an astronomical fee you will learn the basics of the tools and techiques. Things are taught in a rushed manner and sometimes in a mediocre way. Most of the people end the course with the same artistic level that they begin with. You will learn higher education skills that are transfarable to the practice of the profession or other aspects of life. But the price is absolutely not worth it. You can learn the basics of the software and basic techniques from free sources or from a paid source that is an infinitesimal fraction and provide the same or more value. And you can for sure learn the higher education skills that are the most valuable part of the course creating projects by yourself. Most of the international racialized students that I know didn't get into the industry and we were very dissapointed, some of us to the point of depression. It felt like a scam. The teachers don't have a good artistic level and there was a teacher that had a very abussive behaviour. Also, you have to consider that the industry is very discriminatory despite what they say. So if you don't have a European or Canadian passport you will have a difficut time getting a job even in a small studio. The majority of the people working in the studios are white Europeans and North Americans. If you mix a discriminatory industry with a student debt you have a horrible situation. Many of the students that later had success in the industry took further online reputed education like iAnimate or AnimSchool. If you want to become an animator go for this option. Having a MA will give you zero employability advantage. Buy a good computer, get a good subscription, get good online education, do projects by yourself and get feedback. I write this as a way of denouncing my experience there but also to warn you. If you are lucky, you will read this. I would say avoid the MA 3D Computer Animation, and if you don't trust me ask other people I am confident that more people will have the courage to say it. I ended up with an unpayable debt for the minuscule value that I got.
Nothing to show
Amazing university and a great experience for me. I really think it's the best option to live a full college experience. The level of studies and teachers is good, besides being a campus a long time ago. Then you have the option of the village that also has a lot of life.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
