London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs Staffordshire University - Staffs vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs Aston Business School vs Derby Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 374 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Expert and experienced faculty
- +Supportive and collaborative community atmosphere
- +Diverse and flexible learning and assessment methods
- +Engaging curriculum with real-world applicability
- +Exceptional student support and guidance
- +Quality teaching and excellent facilities
- +Connecting theory to practice through real-world cases.
- +Diverse international environment and global opportunities.
- +Relevant industry-focused courses and knowledgeable faculty.
- +Practical, real-world curriculum
- +Focus on personal and leadership development
- +Supportive learning environment and resources
- +Supportive staff and lecturers
- +Positive learning environment
- +Engaging and challenging coursework with strong academic support
- +Vibrant social environment and strong sense of community
- +Excellent facilities and high-quality teaching staff
- +exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable, approachable instructors
- +strong emphasis on precision, quality, and professional skill development
- +welcoming environment and supportive alumni network
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of structure in academic programs.
- -Inadequate support services and limited social opportunities.
- -High fees with perceived low value and administrative issues.
- -Ineffective or unresponsive instructors.
- -Poorly maintained and outdated facilities.
- -Unclear or inconsistent administrative processes.
- -Perceived as a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a consistent concern.
- -Limited resources and lack of essential amenities create difficulties.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are a consistent problem.
- -Poor communication and a lack of support from faculty and staff are frequently cited.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are a major concern.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and unclear course expectations are frequently criticized.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of career support and industry relevance leads to dissatisfaction.
Perceived strengths of this institution lie significantly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both receiving top marks. Conversely, **Student Life** emerges as the area with the lowest reported satisfaction. Ratings for Facilities, Professors, Accomodation, and Value fall within a moderate to good range, indicating generally positive feedback across these aspects.
The university demonstrates excellent performance in several key areas, particularly excelling in **Facilities** with a score of 4.54. **Student Life** and **Internationality** also received strong marks, indicating positive student experiences and a global outlook. Conversely, the **Location** garnered the lowest rating at 4.09, suggesting it may be an area for potential improvement compared to other aspects of university life.
This institution performs well across most aspects, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest area. Facilities, Professors, and Value also receive high marks. Areas for potential improvement include **Location**, which scored the lowest, and Accomodation. Student life and the overall value proposition are rated solidly in the mid-to-high range.
Examining the university's performance across several key metrics reveals a varied picture. The institution shines particularly brightly in **Location**, receiving the highest score. Conversely, **Internationality** garnered the lowest rating. Other areas such as Professors, Student Life, and Value also received strong scores, indicating a generally positive overall experience, though improvements in international student integration could be beneficial.
Performance across key university metrics presents a generally positive outlook. Strongest areas include professors and location, both receiving a 4 out of 5. Areas needing improvement are facilities, student life, and accommodation, which are rated at 3. Internationality also scores a 3, indicating moderate engagement. The university offers good value, also achieving a 4, suggesting a worthwhile educational investment.
An impressive overall performance is evident, with perfect scores awarded for Professors, Location, Student Life, and Internationality. Facilities and Value also received very strong ratings, both scoring above 4.6. The area with the lowest score, though still commendable at 4.33, is Accomodation.
This institution receives high marks for its Location, scoring 4.78, and for its Professors and Internationality, both at 4.67. Facilities also rate well at 4.56. Student Life and Value are both solid at 4.00. The weakest area is Accomodation, which received a rating of 3.22.
Most reviews (~74%) are positive, praising academic reputation, expert faculty, and excellent resources. A small percentage (~3.4%) express dissatisfaction with lecturing quality, course structure, or career services.
With an average rating of 4.22 out of 5, ~78% of reviews are positive. Students praise engaging courses, helpful instructors, and supportive guidance. No negative feedback was received.
Most reviews (approximately 71%) highlight a positive learning atmosphere, inspiring professors, and valuable international experiences. A small amount of feedback (around 14%) suggests mediocrity and a focus on profit. The average rating is 3.86/5.
~100% of reviews are positive, praising the excellent curriculum, personal development opportunities, and supportive learning environment. No negative feedback was recorded.
With an average rating of 4/5 based on one review, this university is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). The student found the support during their initial weeks and accessible lecturers to be highlights.
All three reviews are positive, giving a 5/5 average rating. Students highly recommend Oxford, citing challenging coursework, excellent support, and a strong social environment. Business school facilities and teaching staff also received praise.
All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight exceptional teaching quality and knowledgeable instructors, along with impeccable facilities. The curriculum and emphasis on precision are frequently praised.
LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I have had a very positive experience in my first year at this university. I have found the staff very friendly, all content very engaging and felt I have been challenged throughout the year. One aspect that is particularly strong is the employability at Aston with all modules focusing on giving students hard skills to increase their employability. Only complaint would be some administrative problems such as delayed exam results and some issues with timetabling at the start of term.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
