London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs Robert Gordon University - RGU vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs University of Chester vs Leeds University Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 425 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Expert and experienced faculty
- +Supportive and collaborative community atmosphere
- +Diverse and flexible learning and assessment methods
- +Experienced and supportive staff
- +Practical projects and relevant industry knowledge
- +Friendly and inclusive campus environment
- +Industry-relevant courses for job readiness
- +Positive learning atmosphere and helpful, knowledgeable professors
- +Valuable international exposure and personal/professional development
- +Engaging curriculum with practical applications and hands-on learning
- +Supportive and approachable lecturers passionate about teaching
- +Friendly environment and strong sense of community
- +Friendly and dedicated staff, high-level teaching.
- +Excellent campus facilities and student union.
- +Abundant social events, societies, and accommodation options.
- +Supportive staff and wellbeing resources
- +Smooth application process and fast feedback
- +Career coaching and employable skills development
- +Exceptional chef instructors and curriculum quality.
- +Strong emphasis on skill development and practical experience.
- +Valuable international reputation and alumni network.
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of structure in academic programs.
- -Inadequate support services and limited social opportunities.
- -High fees with perceived low value and administrative issues.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
- -Inefficient administrative processes and unhelpful staff cause frustration.
- -Lack of career support and irrelevant coursework hinder future prospects.
- -Poor quality education and value for money.
- -Poor quality teaching and unhelpful instructors.
- -Lack of social integration and pressure to conform.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities hinder learning.
- -Ineffective administrative and management processes create confusion and frustration.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from faculty and staff is a common complaint.
- -Administrative and management issues caused significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance were major drawbacks.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from faculty was a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment.
- -Poor communication and administrative support.
- -Lack of practical application and relevance in coursework.
Perceived strengths of this institution lie significantly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both receiving top marks. Conversely, **Student Life** emerges as the area with the lowest reported satisfaction. Ratings for Facilities, Professors, Accomodation, and Value fall within a moderate to good range, indicating generally positive feedback across these aspects.
This institution garners excellent feedback in several key areas. Facilities and Internationality stand out with the highest scores. Professors and Value also receive strong ratings. Student Life and Location are well-regarded, though not as high as the leading categories. Accomodation received the lowest, yet still respectable, score.
This institution garners high marks in several key areas. Its Facilities, Professors, and Value are all rated consistently well at 3.83. Internationality stands out as a significant strength with a perfect score of 4. Conversely, Accomodation is a weaker point, rated at 3.2, with Location also receiving a comparatively lower score of 3.33. Student Life falls in the middle with a rating of 3.5.
This institution receives particularly strong marks for its **Professors**, who are rated highly. **Student Life** presents the lowest score among the surveyed aspects. Other areas like Facilities, Location, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value are generally well-regarded, falling within a positive range. The overall sentiment suggests a well-rounded university experience with a particular strength in its academic staff.
This university garners impressive scores across multiple aspects. The strongest areas are location and value, both receiving a perfect 4.75. Professors and student life also rank highly at 4.666. Facilities, accommodation, and internationality are rated consistently well at 4.416, indicating a solid but slightly less exceptional performance in these categories compared to the top-rated elements.
This institution shines in several key areas, boasting perfect scores for its facilities and location, alongside excellent marks for internationality and value. Student life receives a solid rating. However, accommodation stands out as a weaker point, scoring significantly lower than other aspects. Professors are also highly regarded.
Performance varies across key aspects of university life. Outstanding ratings were awarded for Location (4.75) and Professors (4.625), alongside strong marks for Internationality (4.625) and Facilities (4.5). Student Life (3.875) and Value (4.125) received good scores. Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.
Most reviews (~74%) are positive, praising academic reputation, expert faculty, and excellent resources. A small percentage (~3.4%) express dissatisfaction with lecturing quality, course structure, or career services.
With a high average rating of 4.49/5, approximately 91% of 35 reviews are positive. Students frequently praise supportive and experienced staff, engaging courses, and helpful facilities. No negative feedback was recorded.
With a 3.67/5 average, most reviews are positive (~74%), highlighting personal growth, industry-relevant courses, and a good learning atmosphere. One negative review (~16.7%) criticizes the school as a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting well-designed courses and supportive lecturers. A small minority of feedback, around 2.6%, expressed dissatisfaction with the academic program and social environment.
All 12 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students praise friendly staff, excellent facilities like libraries and student unions, and ample social opportunities.
All five reviews are positive, with students praising supportive staff and departments, smooth application processes, and helpful career coaching. Resources like a large library and advance module content are also highlighted.
All eight student reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.63/5. Students highly praise the knowledgeable instructors, quality curriculum, and enriching learning experience.
LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.
My experience as Robert Gordon was quite stress free and insightful.I received lots of coaching and mentorship from Lecturers and senior colleagues ,all the materials I needed to make a headway were available to me ,my lecturers were very friendly and open to any form of guidance and academic assistance needed at any point in time.I am really grateful for my choice of school and all the support I received from Robert Gordon.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
University of Leeds located in the downtown of Leeds. The experience at the University of Leeds is special since teachers are quite friendly and helpful whenever you need help. Also，the school facilities are perfect，almost every building has a rest and coffee area for students to discuss teamwork. And there are three libraries of different sizes which are wonderful. I chose my 7 star hotel apartment which is 15 mins walk distance from the business school and serve free breakfast every morning. This apartment does not belong to my university，therefore I have no idea about the accommodation which offered by the University of Leeds.
It’s a good place to study with lots of activities to do do and with a lot of useful resources as they have a 4 floor library which is great to find studies or even a quite place to study. The modules are set out perfectly with all the content already put up in advance for the students to have a look at so that they can study in advance and have a look through before lessons.
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
