London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs London Metropolitan University vs City St George’s, University of London - City vs ONCAMPUS Global vs London Academy of Trading - LAT
Side-by-side comparison from 518 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Knowledgeable and approachable faculty
- +High-quality academic programs and clear feedback
- +Excellent facilities and resources
- +Strong marketing and business programmes
- +Supportive faculty and academic guidance
- +Valuable practical application and diverse perspectives
- +Strong academic programs and knowledgeable, supportive staff
- +Excellent location and vibrant surrounding environment
- +High employability support and valuable internship opportunities
- +Supportive and approachable teachers
- +Excellent student support services
- +Convenient campus location and facilities
- +Supportive and knowledgeable tutors
- +Engaging daily webinars with market analysis
- +Improved trading profitability and understanding
- +UK qualifications, global presence
- +Great teaching, tutors, and modules
- +Accommodating staff and extracurricular opportunities
- +Exceptional teaching quality from passionate, experienced instructors
- +Unmatched precision, emphasis on quality, and professional skill development
- +Welcoming environment, strong support, and valuable alumni network
- -Poor teaching quality and unstructured courses.
- -High fees combined with lack of support and career services.
- -Limited social life and judgmental environment.
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of course structure leading to inadequate preparation for the workforce.
- -Subpar facilities and unhelpful program office staff.
- -Unprofessional and unsupportive university management.
- -Poor teaching quality and low academic standards.
- -Unmet expectations and perceived focus on profit over student learning.
- -Inappropriate course focus for experienced professionals.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are prevalent.
- -Inefficient administrative processes and lack of clear communication are frustrating.
- -Limited resources and support for academic needs are a concern.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of engagement and uninspired teaching methods are disliked.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of effective communication and support is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
- -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.
Examining the university's performance reveals a diverse set of scores. The strongest areas are **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving very high marks. **Student Life** stands out as the weakest performing category. Other areas like **Professors**, **Accomodation**, and **Facilities** received solid, above-average ratings, with **Value** also scoring positively.
Overall, this university garners solid ratings, excelling particularly in **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.5. **Professors** also received high marks at over 4.3. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerges as the weakest area, with a rating of approximately 3.5. Other categories like Facilities, Student Life, and Value fall within a respectable mid-range of 3.9 to 4.1.
This institution achieves impressive scores, particularly excelling in its Facilities, rated at 4.35, and Internationality, at 4.33. Student Life and Location also perform well, both above 4.1. The primary area for improvement identified is Accomodation, with a rating of 3.95, representing the lowest score among the evaluated aspects. Overall, the university demonstrates a solid standing with a slight opportunity for enhancement in student housing.
This institution garners strong approval across multiple aspects, with particularly high marks for its **Professors (4.76)** and **Location (4.75)**. Student life and internationality also score well, above 4.5. **Accommodations (4.35)** received the lowest rating, though still generally positive, while facilities and value demonstrate solid, above-average performance.
Across numerous metrics, this institution demonstrates exceptional strengths. Facilities, professors, location, student life, and internationality all garnered perfect scores, indicating outstanding offerings in these domains. The sole area falling slightly short, though still very strong, is accommodation at 4.5 stars, suggesting a minor area for potential enhancement compared to its otherwise flawless performance.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its **Location**, receiving a near-perfect score of 4.75, and its **Facilities**, rated at 4.5. Areas for potential improvement are **Accommodations** and **Internationality**, both scoring 3.75. Other categories like Professors, Student Life, and Value fall within a solid range, indicating a generally positive university experience.
This university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **location** (4.7), **professors** (4.6), and **internationality** (4.6). Students are particularly impressed with the quality of instruction and the global environment. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at 3.0, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Student life and value for money also received moderate scores.
Approximately 96.6% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable professors, supportive learning environments, and strong academic reputations. A small percentage (around 3.4%) of negative feedback cites issues with lecturing, grading, and course structure.
Approximately 94% of reviews are positive, highlighting good course quality, professional faculty, and helpful mentors. A small minority of ~6% expressed dissatisfaction with course structure and facilities.
With a 4.3/5 average rating from 106 reviews, ~91.5% of students are highly satisfied. Positive feedback highlights strong courses, knowledgeable staff, and ideal city-centre locations. Very few reviews (approx. 1.9%) express dissatisfaction.
All 21 reviews are positive, averaging 4.76/5 stars. Students frequently praised helpful teachers, strong academic support, and good facilities. Some also highlighted a positive transition experience and newfound confidence.
Both reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Key highlights include excellent tutors, engaging daily webinars, and improved trading profitability. Students appreciated the supportive learning environment that clarified market understanding.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, approximately 100% of feedback is positive. Students praise excellent teaching, supportive staff, and diverse educational perspectives. Some minor feedback notes limited cafeteria food options.
Students highly praise the exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable instructors. Facilities are noted as impeccable and the learning environment welcoming, contributing to professional and personal growth for ~100% of reviewers.
LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.
LondonMet is a great place to have an international experience for foreign students @ different levels. Whether you may search for an affordable and certified executive studies or you may search for a multicultural experience meeting people from all over the world. I personally, find it a great option for a post graduate level of studies.
One positive thing about the university is that they really do emphasise the importance employability and getting that professional experience. I do admire that a lot since they put an importance on preparing students for their future careers. One downside that I have is that there is not much support when it comes to internships and placements which is a bit frustrating since we are left to our own resources. Rather than the university collaborating with companies to make placements mandatory within the course its an option. So we are not guarranted an internship or placement.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
When I attended Pearson, it was relatively new and small. This meant that you could build good relationships with staff and tutors and be able to access any help you needed easily. However, despite how new the business school was, any criticism such as the course structure was unwelcome and always argued with. As each year passed the number of new students in each year increased significantly which caused problems with access to both tutors and quiet study spaces as they only had 2 floors and a basement which was shared with Pearson staff. As for the tutors, I received lectures and seminars from some amazing people who were extremely knowledgeable in accounting and made it so much easier to understand. However, being such a new school they hired tutors who they eventually found out - too late might I add - did not fit the role. Nothing was put in place to help rectify the fact that students had received sub-par teaching. Before attending Pearson College, they bragged about their business workshops and connections. Throughout my time at Pearson, I soon discovered that these workshops were few and far between but more importantly, they were often unrelated to my course or fully booked. One highlight is the fact that they added an office space for a start-up business to work and students were able to gain some experience working with them. Moving onto the facilities of the college, there's really not much to talk about. There's limited space at the campus, especially with the growing number of students. There used to be quiet study rooms for students but they were then taken and used as offices for the growing number of staff. Understandably they need office space but it's very hard to study without quiet spaces such as a library. Lastly, the degrees are validated by the University of Kent which although it gives you faith in the programme you are studying, you are faced with extended wait times for results compared to other universities which is especially frustrating in your final year.
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
