London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs London Metropolitan University vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs Keele University - KLE vs Northumbria University
Side-by-side comparison from 531 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Expert and experienced faculty
- +Supportive and collaborative community atmosphere
- +Diverse and flexible learning and assessment methods
- +Supportive and accessible faculty and staff
- +Diverse and multicultural environment
- +Career-focused and practical learning opportunities
- +Connecting theory to practice through real-world cases.
- +Diverse international environment and global opportunities.
- +Relevant industry-focused courses and knowledgeable faculty.
- +High-quality teaching and strong academic support
- +Supportive learning environment and student services
- +Practical training and industry/career focus
- +Welcoming environment & community building
- +Strong academic programs & practical learning
- +Excellent student support & career guidance
- +Supportive and friendly staff and environment
- +Excellent facilities and resources
- +Effective teaching and immediate issue resolution
- +exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable, approachable instructors
- +strong emphasis on precision, quality, and professional skill development
- +welcoming environment and supportive alumni network
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of structure in academic programs.
- -Inadequate support services and limited social opportunities.
- -High fees with perceived low value and administrative issues.
- -Unprofessional teaching and poorly structured courses.
- -Inadequate facilities and lack of support from the program office.
- -Insufficient preparation for the real working world.
- -Perceived as a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
- -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Unclear communication and lack of student support are prevalent.
- -Program structure is poorly designed and lacks practical application.
- -Courses are irrelevant and do not prepare students for job markets.
- -Lack of career support and teaching staff unsupportive.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are a concern.
- -Lack of engaging teaching and learning experiences is disappointing.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of career support and industry relevance leads to dissatisfaction.
Perceived strengths of this institution lie significantly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both receiving top marks. Conversely, **Student Life** emerges as the area with the lowest reported satisfaction. Ratings for Facilities, Professors, Accomodation, and Value fall within a moderate to good range, indicating generally positive feedback across these aspects.
This institution receives outstanding marks for its **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.5. **Professors** are also highly regarded, with a rating of over 4.3. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the lowest-rated aspect, falling below 3.5. Other categories like Facilities, Student Life, and Value are rated moderately well, generally ranging from approximately 3.9 to 4.1.
This institution performs well across most aspects, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest area. Facilities, Professors, and Value also receive high marks. Areas for potential improvement include **Location**, which scored the lowest, and Accomodation. Student life and the overall value proposition are rated solidly in the mid-to-high range.
This institution receives commendable scores across most metrics. Professors, Internationality, and Facilities stand out as particularly strong areas. The university also fares well in Student Life and Value. Location is rated adequately, though Accommodations emerge as the weakest point in the assessment, receiving a noticeably lower score compared to other categories.
This university garners particularly strong scores in **Location** (4.55) and **Student Life** (4.48), indicating positive student experiences in these aspects. Facilities also receive a high mark at 4.42. The **Accommodation** category shows the lowest rating at 4.02, suggesting this is an area that could be improved, though it remains a respectable score overall. Internationality, Professors, and Value are all rated positively in the low to mid-4s.
This institution scores remarkably well, particularly excelling in **Internationality** with a perfect 5. Facilities and Value also stand out at 4.5. Location, Student Life, and Accommodations are solid at 4. The weakest area, however, is **Professors**, receiving a rating of 3.5, indicating room for improvement in this specific aspect of the university experience.
This institution receives high marks for its Location, scoring 4.78, and for its Professors and Internationality, both at 4.67. Facilities also rate well at 4.56. Student Life and Value are both solid at 4.00. The weakest area is Accomodation, which received a rating of 3.22.
Most reviews (~74%) are positive, praising academic reputation, expert faculty, and excellent resources. A small percentage (~3.4%) express dissatisfaction with lecturing quality, course structure, or career services.
Approximately 93% of reviews are positive, highlighting diverse courses, supportive mentors, and welcoming staff. A small percentage of feedback (~7%) mentions issues with course structure and facilities.
Most reviews (approximately 71%) highlight a positive learning atmosphere, inspiring professors, and valuable international experiences. A small amount of feedback (around 14%) suggests mediocrity and a focus on profit. The average rating is 3.86/5.
With ~100% positive sentiment, reviews highlight strong academic programs, industry connections, and supportive learning environments. Specific praise focuses on teaching quality, career support, and modern facilities.
The university receives high praise (~79%) for its welcoming atmosphere, hands-on learning, and career support. A small portion of feedback (~5.5%) mentions issues with program structure and job prospects.
With a 4.5/5 average rating and 100% positive feedback, students highlight excellent facilities and supportive staff. They praise the variety of resources, comfortable environments, and friendly people.
All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight exceptional teaching quality and knowledgeable instructors, along with impeccable facilities. The curriculum and emphasis on precision are frequently praised.
LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.
LondonMet is a great place to have an international experience for foreign students @ different levels. Whether you may search for an affordable and certified executive studies or you may search for a multicultural experience meeting people from all over the world. I personally, find it a great option for a post graduate level of studies.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Overall, my time at Northumbria was ok. Not great just ok. My time was influenced by the COVID outbreak and so my final year was all online. Through my second and final year there was a lack of support from tutors. Not only that I had extenuating circumstances which were ignored when appealing my final grade.
Nothing to show
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
