London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs London Metropolitan University vs ONCAMPUS Global vs Greenwich School of Management vs University of West London
Side-by-side comparison from 486 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Knowledgeable and approachable faculty
- +High-quality academic programs and clear feedback
- +Excellent facilities and resources
- +Strong marketing and business programmes
- +Supportive faculty and academic guidance
- +Valuable practical application and diverse perspectives
- +Supportive and approachable teachers
- +Excellent student support services
- +Convenient campus location and facilities
- +Practical learning and real-world skills
- +Experienced and supportive faculty
- +Inclusive and collaborative environment
- +Strong industry connections and career opportunities
- +Engaging and relevant curriculum
- +Positive social environment and helpful staff
- +Diverse and inclusive community.
- +Global perspectives and academic rigor.
- +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty.
- +Supportive and knowledgeable tutors
- +Engaging daily webinars with market analysis
- +Improved trading profitability and understanding
- -Poor teaching quality and unstructured courses.
- -High fees combined with lack of support and career services.
- -Limited social life and judgmental environment.
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of course structure leading to inadequate preparation for the workforce.
- -Subpar facilities and unhelpful program office staff.
- -Unprofessional and unsupportive university management.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are prevalent.
- -Inefficient administrative processes and lack of clear communication are frustrating.
- -Limited resources and support for academic needs are a concern.
- -Limited course variety and depth.
- -Inconsistent faculty quality and support.
- -Inconvenient campus locations and access.
- -Administrative and communication issues cause confusion and disruption.
- -Poor administrative support and communication lead to unresolved issues.
- -Lack of adequate support services and advice negatively impacts student well-being and finances.
- -Uncommunicated changes and issues with departmental structure cause significant disruption.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of engagement and uninspired teaching methods are disliked.
Examining the university's performance reveals a diverse set of scores. The strongest areas are **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving very high marks. **Student Life** stands out as the weakest performing category. Other areas like **Professors**, **Accomodation**, and **Facilities** received solid, above-average ratings, with **Value** also scoring positively.
Overall, this university garners solid ratings, excelling particularly in **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.5. **Professors** also received high marks at over 4.3. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerges as the weakest area, with a rating of approximately 3.5. Other categories like Facilities, Student Life, and Value fall within a respectable mid-range of 3.9 to 4.1.
This institution garners strong approval across multiple aspects, with particularly high marks for its **Professors (4.76)** and **Location (4.75)**. Student life and internationality also score well, above 4.5. **Accommodations (4.35)** received the lowest rating, though still generally positive, while facilities and value demonstrate solid, above-average performance.
Examining the university's ratings reveals a distinct pattern. The strongest areas are Facilities and Value, both scoring a high 4.1. Internationality also performs well at 3.5. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest point with a low 1.85 rating. Student Life and Location also received moderate scores, indicating areas with potential for improvement.
This institution receives particularly high marks for its **Internationality** (4.46) and **Location** (4.45). **Professors** (4.43) and **Facilities** (4.42) also score very well. **Student Life** (4.19) and **Value** (4.33) are rated positively. The **Accomodation** (3.89) is the lowest-scoring area, though still above average.
This university garners high marks, particularly excelling in its prime **location**, which received a near-perfect score. **Internationality** and **Student Life** also stand out positively. Conversely, **Accommodations** present the lowest-rated aspect. Other areas like **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Value** are generally rated well, indicating a solid overall offering with specific strengths and one area for potential improvement.
Across numerous metrics, this institution demonstrates exceptional strengths. Facilities, professors, location, student life, and internationality all garnered perfect scores, indicating outstanding offerings in these domains. The sole area falling slightly short, though still very strong, is accommodation at 4.5 stars, suggesting a minor area for potential enhancement compared to its otherwise flawless performance.
Approximately 96.6% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable professors, supportive learning environments, and strong academic reputations. A small percentage (around 3.4%) of negative feedback cites issues with lecturing, grading, and course structure.
Approximately 94% of reviews are positive, highlighting good course quality, professional faculty, and helpful mentors. A small minority of ~6% expressed dissatisfaction with course structure and facilities.
All 21 reviews are positive, averaging 4.76/5 stars. Students frequently praised helpful teachers, strong academic support, and good facilities. Some also highlighted a positive transition experience and newfound confidence.
With a 3.5/5 average rating, reviews are mixed, with roughly 50% negative feedback. Students appreciate practical learning and experienced faculty, but some note a limited course selection.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~86% praising great experiences, helpful staff, and relevant courses. A small amount of negative feedback, ~2%, concerns administrative communication and organization.
~76% of 34 reviews are positive, praising global perspectives, diverse community, and supportive professors. A small percentage of negative feedback (approximately 5.9%) mentions issues with administrative support and communication.
Both reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Key highlights include excellent tutors, engaging daily webinars, and improved trading profitability. Students appreciated the supportive learning environment that clarified market understanding.
LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.
LondonMet is a great place to have an international experience for foreign students @ different levels. Whether you may search for an affordable and certified executive studies or you may search for a multicultural experience meeting people from all over the world. I personally, find it a great option for a post graduate level of studies.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I am originally from the USA but decided to pursue my Masters degree in London. My university has a large diverse community of students. I was able to thrive in this environment as I was accepted for being myself. I am Proud to be a SOAS graduate.
Nothing to show
