London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs Edinburgh Napier University vs ONCAMPUS Global vs Liverpool Hope University - Hope vs University of Wolverhampton Business School

Side-by-side comparison from 436 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: London Academy of Trading - LAT (5.00)
London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE: wins 0/7 categories
Edinburgh Napier University: wins 0/7 categories
ONCAMPUS Global: wins 0/7 categories
Liverpool Hope University - Hope: wins 0/7 categories
University of Wolverhampton Business School: wins 0/7 categories
London Academy of Trading - LAT: wins 7/7 categories
University of Wolverhampton: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Economics
Edinburgh, The United Kingdom
4.20
Read more reviews
48 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Management
London, The United Kingdom
4.80
Read more reviews
21 reviews
×
Best programme: Undergraduate Foundation Programme
Liverpool, The United Kingdom
4.30
Read more reviews
12 reviews
×
Best programme: Data Science
Wolverhampton, The United Kingdom
4.30
Read more reviews
7 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration in Management
London, The United Kingdom
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Advanced Trading Course
Wolverhampton, The United Kingdom
4.30
Read more reviews
19 reviews
×
Best programme: Biomedical Science
Category ratings
Facilities
4.05
4.33
4.44
4.00
3.50
5.00
Win
4.06
Location
4.78
4.20
4.75
3.75
4.14
5.00
Win
3.76
Professors
4.26
4.17
4.76
4.00
4.43
5.00
Win
4.26
Internationality
4.80
4.17
4.62
3.89
3.86
5.00
Win
3.89
Student life
3.65
4.20
4.58
4.00
3.29
5.00
Win
4.18
Value
4.05
4.05
4.52
3.78
3.86
5.00
Win
4.05
Accommodation
3.80
3.65
4.35
3.88
3.86
4.50
Win
3.44
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Knowledgeable and approachable faculty
  • +High-quality academic programs and clear feedback
  • +Excellent facilities and resources
  • +Supportive faculty and well-structured, practical, career-focused programs
  • +Beautiful and enjoyable campus environment with good accommodation
  • +Strong industry links and job market relevance
  • +Supportive and approachable teachers
  • +Excellent student support services
  • +Convenient campus location and facilities
  • +Supportive and interactive tutors and teaching staff
  • +Welcoming and inclusive student experience
  • +Good course variety and clear curriculum delivery
  • +Interactive, knowledgeable, and supportive lecturers
  • +Relevant, contemporary course content
  • +Strong preparation for future careers
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable tutors
  • +Engaging daily webinars with market analysis
  • +Improved trading profitability and understanding
  • +Exceptional teaching standards and lecturer support
  • +Strong career preparation and relevant course content
  • +Comprehensive student support services and inclusive environment
Cons
  • -Poor teaching quality and unstructured courses.
  • -High fees combined with lack of support and career services.
  • -Limited social life and judgmental environment.
  • -Unapproachable, neglectful, and even bullying lecturers
  • -Administrative and management issues
  • -Outdated facilities
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are prevalent.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes and lack of clear communication are frustrating.
  • -Limited resources and support for academic needs are a concern.
  • -Poor quality of lecturing and lack of feedback.
  • -Administrative and management issues.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is a problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of engagement and uninspired teaching methods are disliked.
  • -Poor quality and unhelpful study materials are a recurring issue.
  • -Inconsistent and unfair grading, with general feedback, causes significant student frustration.
  • -Slow and limited student support exacerbates problems.
Rating summary
What students say

Examining the university's performance reveals a diverse set of scores. The strongest areas are **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving very high marks. **Student Life** stands out as the weakest performing category. Other areas like **Professors**, **Accomodation**, and **Facilities** received solid, above-average ratings, with **Value** also scoring positively.

With excellent scores across several key areas, this institution particularly shines in its **Facilities**, receiving a high mark of 4.325. **Professors** and **Internationality** are also well-regarded, both scoring 4.17. The university's **Accomodation** stands out as its lowest-rated category at 3.65, though it still represents a satisfactory average. **Value** and **Student Life** also received strong scores above 4.0.

This institution garners strong approval across multiple aspects, with particularly high marks for its **Professors (4.76)** and **Location (4.75)**. Student life and internationality also score well, above 4.5. **Accommodations (4.35)** received the lowest rating, though still generally positive, while facilities and value demonstrate solid, above-average performance.

This institution performs best in its **Facilities**, earning a solid 4.06 rating. **Student Life** also scores well at a 4.0. The university's lowest-scoring area is **Location**, with a rating of 3.73. Other categories such as Professors, Accomodation, and Internationality fall within a mid-range of 3.85 to 3.98, indicating generally positive but not exceptional feedback in these aspects.

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its academic offerings, with Professors receiving a high rating of 4.43 and Location also scoring well at 4.14. Areas for potential improvement include Facilities, rated at 3.5, and Student Life, which received a 3.29. Accomodation, Internationality, and Value all achieved a respectable 3.86.

Across numerous metrics, this institution demonstrates exceptional strengths. Facilities, professors, location, student life, and internationality all garnered perfect scores, indicating outstanding offerings in these domains. The sole area falling slightly short, though still very strong, is accommodation at 4.5 stars, suggesting a minor area for potential enhancement compared to its otherwise flawless performance.

This university garners positive feedback across multiple aspects, with professors earning the highest marks. Student life and facilities also received strong scores. Areas for potential improvement include accommodation, which received the lowest rating, and location. Internationality and value are rated moderately well, contributing to an overall positive impression.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Approximately 96.6% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable professors, supportive learning environments, and strong academic reputations. A small percentage (around 3.4%) of negative feedback cites issues with lecturing, grading, and course structure.

Approximately 98% of reviews are positive, highlighting a beautiful campus, supportive lecturers, and career-focused courses. One negative review expressed concerns about unapproachable and neglectful lecturers.

All 21 reviews are positive, averaging 4.76/5 stars. Students frequently praised helpful teachers, strong academic support, and good facilities. Some also highlighted a positive transition experience and newfound confidence.

Approximately 92% of 12 reviews are positive, citing great support, interactive teaching, and a comfortable atmosphere. A small amount of negative feedback (~8%) mentioned issues with lecturing quality.

With an average rating of 4.29/5 from 7 reviews, ~86% of feedback is positive. Students highlight collaborative learning, knowledgeable and attentive lecturers, and preparation for life after university. No negative feedback was reported.

Both reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Key highlights include excellent tutors, engaging daily webinars, and improved trading profitability. Students appreciated the supportive learning environment that clarified market understanding.

University reviews are largely positive, with ~84% of 19 students giving 4-5 stars. Praises highlight strong student support, effective teaching, and career preparation. Limited negative feedback (around ~10.5%) mentions basic study materials and slow support response times.

Rating distribution
5★
34%
33%
76%
42%
43%
100%
63%
4★
44%
54%
24%
50%
43%
0%
21%
3★
18%
10%
0%
0%
14%
0%
5%
2★
2%
0%
0%
8%
0%
0%
0%
1★
1%
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
11%
Most useful review
Most liked
Great Experience

LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.

Undergraduate Law

This university is welcoming and continually helpful by staff and pupils. I would recommend this university to new students. The law degree I am currently studying is exactly what I expected and is also very enjoyable.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Do not study the Online MSc Psychology

I am studying the course. The study materials are so basic. You will not learn anything from the courses. The grades will always be up to the markers, who just do whatever they want, without following the criteria. Feedbacks have been so general without any meanings. I have suffered mental trauma and depression due to this course. Support are limited and students have to wait 1-2 weeks or more just to get a reply. Do yourself a favor and find other universities. YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED!

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close