London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs York St John University vs University of Wolverhampton Business School vs Stanmore School Of Business - SSB
Side-by-side comparison from 395 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Expert and experienced faculty
- +Supportive and collaborative community atmosphere
- +Diverse and flexible learning and assessment methods
- +Connecting theory to practice through real-world cases.
- +Diverse international environment and global opportunities.
- +Relevant industry-focused courses and knowledgeable faculty.
- +Small class sizes and detailed teaching
- +Wide range of courses and specialist staff
- +Strong student support and engaging activities
- +Interactive, knowledgeable, and supportive lecturers
- +Relevant, contemporary course content
- +Strong preparation for future careers
Nothing to show
- +exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable, approachable instructors
- +strong emphasis on precision, quality, and professional skill development
- +welcoming environment and supportive alumni network
- +Strong student support and inclusive environment.
- +High-quality teaching and knowledgeable lecturers.
- +Relevant courses and career preparation.
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of structure in academic programs.
- -Inadequate support services and limited social opportunities.
- -High fees with perceived low value and administrative issues.
- -Perceived as a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are commonly criticized.
- -Course content and teaching quality often fail to meet student expectations.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a problem.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of career support and industry relevance leads to dissatisfaction.
- -Unreasonable payment deadlines conflicting with student finance release.
- -Poor communication and unclear financial expectations.
Perceived strengths of this institution lie significantly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both receiving top marks. Conversely, **Student Life** emerges as the area with the lowest reported satisfaction. Ratings for Facilities, Professors, Accomodation, and Value fall within a moderate to good range, indicating generally positive feedback across these aspects.
This institution performs well across most aspects, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest area. Facilities, Professors, and Value also receive high marks. Areas for potential improvement include **Location**, which scored the lowest, and Accomodation. Student life and the overall value proposition are rated solidly in the mid-to-high range.
Exceptionally high ratings characterize this university's offerings. The facilities stand out with an impressive score of 4.53, representing its strongest area. Conversely, accommodation received the lowest rating at 4.03. Other areas like professors, student life, internationality, and value all show solid scores above 4.2, indicating a generally positive experience across multiple facets of university life.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its academic offerings, with Professors receiving a high rating of 4.43 and Location also scoring well at 4.14. Areas for potential improvement include Facilities, rated at 3.5, and Student Life, which received a 3.29. Accomodation, Internationality, and Value all achieved a respectable 3.86.
Nothing to show
This institution receives high marks for its Location, scoring 4.78, and for its Professors and Internationality, both at 4.67. Facilities also rate well at 4.56. Student Life and Value are both solid at 4.00. The weakest area is Accomodation, which received a rating of 3.22.
Performance across key university metrics shows a generally positive reception. Professors and student life emerge as the strongest areas, both receiving high marks. Accommodation, however, presents the weakest area according to these ratings. Internationality and value also score well, indicating broad strengths, while facilities and location fall in the middle of the spectrum.
Most reviews (~74%) are positive, praising academic reputation, expert faculty, and excellent resources. A small percentage (~3.4%) express dissatisfaction with lecturing quality, course structure, or career services.
Most reviews (approximately 71%) highlight a positive learning atmosphere, inspiring professors, and valuable international experiences. A small amount of feedback (around 14%) suggests mediocrity and a focus on profit. The average rating is 3.86/5.
With ~97% positive feedback and an average of 4.19/5, students highlight excellent teaching and small class sizes. They appreciate ample extracurriculars and good student support.
With an average rating of 4.29/5 from 7 reviews, ~86% of feedback is positive. Students highlight collaborative learning, knowledgeable and attentive lecturers, and preparation for life after university. No negative feedback was reported.
Nothing to show
All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight exceptional teaching quality and knowledgeable instructors, along with impeccable facilities. The curriculum and emphasis on precision are frequently praised.
Strong support services and dedicated lecturers are frequently praised, creating a positive learning environment for ~89% of students. A small amount of feedback mentions issues with enrollment and payment processes.
LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
Nothing to show
