London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs ONCAMPUS Global vs Glasgow Caledonian University vs Brunel Business School vs London Academy of Trading - LAT
Side-by-side comparison from 500 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Expert, approachable faculty and high-quality teaching
- +Strong career preparation and marketable skills development
- +Excellent facilities and a supportive learning environment
- +Knowledgeable and supportive faculty
- +Academic and personal growth opportunities
- +Diverse student community and good facilities
- +Welcoming and inclusive environment with supportive staff.
- +Strong focus on employability and industry-relevant programs.
- +Well-equipped campus with convenient city center location.
- +Applied learning and relevant coursework
- +Strong employability and career support
- +Flexible schedules and learning resources
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Accessible resources and user-friendly website
- +Positive learning environment and supportive teachers
- +Strong professional development and career opportunities
- -Poor teaching quality and unclear learning expectations.
- -Lack of structure and significant workload.
- -Disappointing careers service and limited social life.
- -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a common complaint.
- -Lack of communication and transparency is a recurring problem.
- -Limited focus on practical skills and "hard facts."
- -Cumbersome administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and technology.
- -Unclear communication and bureaucratic processes.
- -Lack of modern resources and support.
- -Outdated facilities and infrastructure.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a common complaint.
- -Lack of clear communication and transparency exacerbates problems.
This institution demonstrates remarkable strengths in its **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving scores nearing 4.8. **Professors** also score highly at 4.26. Conversely, **Student Life** is the lowest-rated area, with a score of 3.64, followed by **Accomodation** at 3.79. Other aspects like Facilities and Value fall within a solid mid-range.
A robust profile emerges, with exceptional marks for its professors, location, and student life. The university also scores well in internationality and value. Conversely, facilities and accommodation received slightly lower, though still positive, ratings, representing the areas with the most room for improvement.
Considering the provided scores, this institution excels in its **location**, boasting the highest rating. Student life and internationality are also significant strengths. However, **accommodation** received the lowest score, indicating an area for improvement. Overall, the university demonstrates strong performance in most aspects, with location being a standout feature.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its faculty, with professors receiving a high rating of 4.29. Student life also scores well at 4.08, alongside a strong internationality rating of 4.14. Value for money is rated at a solid 4.0. Conversely, location appears to be the least favored aspect, scoring 3.25. Facilities are moderately rated at 3.85, and accommodation also receives a respectable 3.79.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With outstanding scores in nearly every aspect, this institution excels in its facilities, professors, location, accommodation, internationality, and overall value, all receiving perfect marks. However, a significant area for improvement is evident in student life, which received the lowest possible rating, indicating a substantial deficit in this crucial category.
Nearly 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting a supportive environment, knowledgeable faculty, and excellent facilities. A small percentage (around 3.4%) mention issues like poor lecturing, inconsistent grading, and lack of social life.
With an average rating of 4.74/5 from 19 reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students praise supportive and knowledgeable lecturers, helpful academic support, good facilities, and a diverse community. Minimal negative feedback was noted.
With ~93% positive feedback from 139 reviews, students praise the welcoming atmosphere, strong employability focus, and helpful staff. A single negative review cited a lack of "hard facts" in the program.
With an average rating of 4.64/5 from 14 reviews, ~93% are positive. Students praise applied learning, employability skills, and support for international students. There are no negative reviews.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 5/5, 100% of reviews are positive. Students praise the university experience and CIMA's support, describing it as a dream come true.
LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
It was a dream come true, I wanted to become a CIMA member which I achieved in 2015, the thing I like their support very user friendly website, the thing I dislike is the Merger with AICPA, as it seems like for most members it is not a merger but a take over. All in all I am happy to be a member in this Esteem Management Accountancy body.
