London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs ONCAMPUS Global vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs Abertay University vs University of Wolverhampton Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 396 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Marketable courses and high academic standards
- +Excellent, expert faculty with industry experience
- +Supportive, respectful, and flexible learning environment
- +Excellent academic preparation and progression support
- +Supportive and engaging teaching staff
- +Positive student life and opportunities
- +Connecting theory to practice through real-world cases.
- +Diverse international environment and global opportunities.
- +Relevant industry-focused courses and knowledgeable faculty.
- +Supportive and collaborative academic environment
- +High-quality teaching and approachable staff
- +Practical and industry-focused curriculum
- +Interactive, knowledgeable, and supportive lecturers
- +Relevant, contemporary course content
- +Strong preparation for future careers
- +exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable, approachable instructors
- +strong emphasis on precision, quality, and professional skill development
- +welcoming environment and supportive alumni network
- +Exceptional teaching standards and lecturer support
- +Strong career preparation and relevant course content
- +Comprehensive student support services and inclusive environment
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of structure in programs.
- -High fees are not justified by the quality of education and support.
- -Limited social life and inadequate student support services.
- -Students dislike administrative inefficiencies and poor management.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a significant concern.
- -The curriculum and teaching quality are often criticized as being insufficient.
- -Perceived as a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Lack of support and resources negatively impacts the student experience.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of career support and industry relevance leads to dissatisfaction.
- -Poor quality and unhelpful study materials are a recurring issue.
- -Inconsistent and unfair grading, with general feedback, causes significant student frustration.
- -Slow and limited student support exacerbates problems.
With a strong emphasis on **Internationality** (4.80) and **Location** (4.78), this institution presents a globally connected and well-situated environment. Professors also receive high marks (4.26). Conversely, **Student Life** (3.63) and **Accommodations** (3.79) are the areas with the lowest reported satisfaction, suggesting room for improvement in campus vibrancy and living arrangements.
This institution receives generally strong ratings from students. The strongest areas are Professors, with an exceptional score of 4.71, closely followed by Accomodation at 4.67 and Location at 4.5. Facilities and Student Life are also well-regarded, both scoring 4.4. The weakest area is Value, though it still holds a respectable 4.29. Internationality also performs well, averaging 4.43.
This institution performs well across most aspects, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest area. Facilities, Professors, and Value also receive high marks. Areas for potential improvement include **Location**, which scored the lowest, and Accomodation. Student life and the overall value proposition are rated solidly in the mid-to-high range.
Across various aspects, this institution garners solid feedback. Location and value stand out as its strongest points, both receiving ratings above 4.3. Student life and professors are also highly regarded. Accommodations represent the weakest area with the lowest score, though still a respectable 4.15. Facilities and internationality also score well, indicating a generally positive student experience.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its academic offerings, with Professors receiving a high rating of 4.43 and Location also scoring well at 4.14. Areas for potential improvement include Facilities, rated at 3.5, and Student Life, which received a 3.29. Accomodation, Internationality, and Value all achieved a respectable 3.86.
This institution receives high marks for its Location, scoring 4.78, and for its Professors and Internationality, both at 4.67. Facilities also rate well at 4.56. Student Life and Value are both solid at 4.00. The weakest area is Accomodation, which received a rating of 3.22.
This university garners positive feedback across multiple aspects, with professors earning the highest marks. Student life and facilities also received strong scores. Areas for potential improvement include accommodation, which received the lowest rating, and location. Internationality and value are rated moderately well, contributing to an overall positive impression.
Most reviews (~74%) praise marketable courses, expert faculty, and excellent research opportunities. Very few (~3.4%) express concerns about teaching quality, grading consistency, and career services.
All 7 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.57/5. Students praised outstanding teaching staff, excellent academic preparation for university progression, and helpful curriculum.
Most reviews (approximately 71%) highlight a positive learning atmosphere, inspiring professors, and valuable international experiences. A small amount of feedback (around 14%) suggests mediocrity and a focus on profit. The average rating is 3.86/5.
With 22 positive reviews out of 23, students praise the supportive academic environment, knowledgeable lecturers, and helpful resources. The learning experience is generally rated highly, with ~0% negative feedback.
With an average rating of 4.29/5 from 7 reviews, ~86% of feedback is positive. Students highlight collaborative learning, knowledgeable and attentive lecturers, and preparation for life after university. No negative feedback was reported.
All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight exceptional teaching quality and knowledgeable instructors, along with impeccable facilities. The curriculum and emphasis on precision are frequently praised.
University reviews are largely positive, with ~84% of 19 students giving 4-5 stars. Praises highlight strong student support, effective teaching, and career preparation. Limited negative feedback (around ~10.5%) mentions basic study materials and slow support response times.
LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
I am studying the course. The study materials are so basic. You will not learn anything from the courses. The grades will always be up to the markers, who just do whatever they want, without following the criteria. Feedbacks have been so general without any meanings. I have suffered mental trauma and depression due to this course. Support are limited and students have to wait 1-2 weeks or more just to get a reply. Do yourself a favor and find other universities. YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED!
