London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs University of the West of Scotland - UWS vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs Sheffield Hallam University vs University of Suffolk - UoS

Side-by-side comparison from 470 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Acudemy (5.00)
London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE: wins 1/7 categories
University of the West of Scotland - UWS: wins 0/7 categories
EM Normandie - EM Normandie: wins 0/7 categories
Sheffield Hallam University: wins 0/7 categories
University of Suffolk - UoS: wins 0/7 categories
Le Cordon Bleu Paris: wins 2/7 categories
Acudemy: wins 4/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Economics
Best programme: Human Resource Management
Best programme: MSc International Logistics and Port Management
Sheffield, The United Kingdom
4.10
Read more reviews
83 reviews
×
Best programme: Biology
Ipswich, The United Kingdom
4.30
Read more reviews
15 reviews
×
Best programme: Public Health
Best programme: Culinary Arts
London, The United Kingdom
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Administrative and Accounting Systems
Category ratings
Facilities
4.04
4.16
4.00
4.18
4.05
4.56
Win
4.00
Location
4.78
Win
3.84
3.57
4.38
3.90
4.78
Not rated
Professors
4.26
4.42
4.00
4.14
4.23
4.67
Win
4.00
Internationality
4.80
4.29
4.14
3.88
4.34
4.67
5.00
Win
Student life
3.63
3.48
3.71
4.12
3.58
4.00
5.00
Win
Value
4.04
4.10
4.00
3.80
4.27
4.00
5.00
Win
Accommodation
3.78
3.40
3.50
3.87
3.44
3.22
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Expert and experienced faculty
  • +Supportive and collaborative community atmosphere
  • +Diverse and flexible learning and assessment methods
  • +Supportive, knowledgeable, and accessible faculty
  • +Engaging, innovative, and comprehensive course content
  • +Vibrant campus life and diverse student community
  • +Connecting theory to practice through real-world cases.
  • +Diverse international environment and global opportunities.
  • +Relevant industry-focused courses and knowledgeable faculty.
  • +Supportive and friendly environment
  • +Welcoming culture and sense of belonging
  • +Varied curriculum and accommodating staff
  • +Supportive faculty and personalized academic/personal assistance
  • +Flexible and high-quality learning experiences, both online and in-person
  • +Welcoming environment and enriching extracurricular opportunities
  • +exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable, approachable instructors
  • +strong emphasis on precision, quality, and professional skill development
  • +welcoming environment and supportive alumni network
  • +Outstanding national and international reputation
  • +Transformative personal development and gained confidence
Cons
  • -Poor teaching quality and lack of structure in academic programs.
  • -Inadequate support services and limited social opportunities.
  • -High fees with perceived low value and administrative issues.
  • -Lack of academic and administrative support.
  • -Ineffective teaching and unclear assignment guidance.
  • -Insufficient time for major projects.
  • -Perceived as a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
  • -University disruptions and limited teaching time were major disappointments.
  • -Inadequate student support from the Students' Union.
  • -Small and insufficient modern facilities.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of career support and industry relevance leads to dissatisfaction.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a significant concern.
  • -Lack of adequate resources and support hinders academic progress.
Rating summary
What students say

Perceived strengths of this institution lie significantly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both receiving top marks. Conversely, **Student Life** emerges as the area with the lowest reported satisfaction. Ratings for Facilities, Professors, Accomodation, and Value fall within a moderate to good range, indicating generally positive feedback across these aspects.

Demonstrating robust strengths in key areas, this university excels with particularly high marks for its professors and internationality. Facilities and value are also well-regarded. Conversely, student life and accommodation present as areas for potential improvement, receiving the lowest scores. Location also shows room for enhancement.

This institution performs well across most aspects, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest area. Facilities, Professors, and Value also receive high marks. Areas for potential improvement include **Location**, which scored the lowest, and Accomodation. Student life and the overall value proposition are rated solidly in the mid-to-high range.

This institution garners a robust overall rating, with its **location** standing out as a particular strength at 4.38. Students also commend **facilities** (4.18), **professors** (4.14), and **student life** (4.12). Areas showing room for improvement include **accommodation** (3.87), **internationality** (3.88), and the **value** proposition (3.80), which received the lowest scores among the evaluated aspects.

Evaluations reveal a university with particular strengths in Internationality, rated at 4.34, and Professors, at 4.23. Value for money also scores highly. Conversely, Accomodation emerges as the area with the lowest rating at 3.44, closely followed by Student Life at 3.58. Facilities and Location show solid, mid-range scores.

This institution receives high marks for its Location, scoring 4.78, and for its Professors and Internationality, both at 4.67. Facilities also rate well at 4.56. Student Life and Value are both solid at 4.00. The weakest area is Accomodation, which received a rating of 3.22.

Exceptional student life, accommodation, internationality, and value are clear strengths for this university, all receiving perfect scores. Professors and facilities are also well-regarded with a 4 out of 5. The only area falling short is location, which received a zero, indicating a significant weakness in this aspect.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Most reviews (~74%) are positive, praising academic reputation, expert faculty, and excellent resources. A small percentage (~3.4%) express dissatisfaction with lecturing quality, course structure, or career services.

Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting valuable courses, supportive faculty, and a lively student environment. A single negative review mentioned a lack of course support and unhelpful lecturers.

Most reviews (approximately 71%) highlight a positive learning atmosphere, inspiring professors, and valuable international experiences. A small amount of feedback (around 14%) suggests mediocrity and a focus on profit. The average rating is 3.86/5.

With an average rating of 4.06/5 from 83 reviews, ~74% of feedback is positive, highlighting a supportive, friendly, and welcoming environment with caring staff. A single negative review (~1.2%) was received.

~93% of reviews are positive, highlighting assignment-based assessments, helpful faculty, and a welcoming environment. A small portion (~7%) mentions issues with the Students' Union.

All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight exceptional teaching quality and knowledgeable instructors, along with impeccable facilities. The curriculum and emphasis on precision are frequently praised.

The single review is highly positive, giving a 5/5 rating. Approximately 100% of feedback is positive, with no negative reviews reported.

Rating distribution
5★
34%
39%
43%
28%
47%
67%
100%
4★
44%
36%
29%
52%
47%
33%
0%
3★
19%
21%
14%
19%
0%
0%
0%
2★
2%
3%
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
1★
1%
0%
14%
0%
7%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Great Experience

LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.

More programme coordination

The lecturers in my programme are quite helpful. Would recommend they infuse some kind of practice or practicality into the program. A little bit of programme coordination, and more interaction with peers should be incorporated.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Teaching, assessment, accessibility to study materials, interactiveness

Good university where you can get value for money. Assessments based on proposing solutions to problems faced by real-life organisations using business models. Teacher to student interaction is high and encouraged. I would recommend the University to anyone who wants to obtain a highly regarded graduate degree at an affordable cost

Student in 2013

I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close