London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs Norwegian University of Science and Technology - NTNU vs BI Norwegian Business School - BI vs University Of Hradec Králové vs Kenyon College

Side-by-side comparison from 341 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE: wins 0/1 categories
Norwegian University of Science and Technology - NTNU: wins 0/1 categories
BI Norwegian Business School - BI: wins 0/1 categories
University Of Hradec Králové: wins 0/1 categories
Kenyon College: wins 0/1 categories
NHH Norwegian School of Economics: wins 0/1 categories
University of Oslo: wins 1/1 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Economics
Best programme: Computer Science
Best programme: B.Sc. in International Business Administration
Hradek Kralove, Czech Republic
3.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Ohio, United States
5.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: International Relations
Best programme: Economics and Finance
Trondheim, Norway
5.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Social Arts
Category ratings
Facilities
4.04
4.14
5.00
4.00
5.00
4.71
5.00
Location
4.78
4.14
5.00
4.00
3.00
4.14
5.00
Professors
4.26
4.00
4.00
4.00
5.00
4.43
5.00
Internationality
4.80
4.00
5.00
4.00
4.00
4.43
5.00
Student life
3.63
4.29
4.00
4.00
5.00
4.29
5.00
Value
4.04
4.14
3.00
4.00
5.00
4.14
5.00
Accommodation
3.78
4.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
4.71
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Expert and experienced faculty
  • +Supportive and collaborative community atmosphere
  • +Diverse and flexible learning and assessment methods
  • +Strong academic programs and knowledgeable professors.
  • +Practical experience and career opportunities.
  • +Vibrant student life and city atmosphere.
  • +Strong industry connections and practical business education
  • +International environment and balanced daily life
  • +Excellent and varied food options

Nothing to show

  • +Engaging professors & small class sizes
  • +Unique gothic architecture
  • +Opportunities for extracurriculars
  • +Free tuition and diverse program options
  • +High quality education and international exchange opportunities
  • +Supportive environment and welcoming community
  • +Insightful understanding of Norwegian welfare model
  • +Exploration of universalism, public sector strength, and social solidarity
  • +Balance of economic competitiveness and social protection
Cons
  • -Poor teaching quality and lack of structure in academic programs.
  • -Inadequate support services and limited social opportunities.
  • -High fees with perceived low value and administrative issues.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources significantly hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of clear guidance are prevalent.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of student support are common complaints.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a significant drawback.
  • -Course content and teaching methods are often perceived as irrelevant or ineffective.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring concern.
  • -Poor teaching quality and curriculum relevance are often criticized.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning and comfort.
  • -The curriculum lacks depth and practical application.
Rating summary
What students say

Perceived strengths of this institution lie significantly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both receiving top marks. Conversely, **Student Life** emerges as the area with the lowest reported satisfaction. Ratings for Facilities, Professors, Accomodation, and Value fall within a moderate to good range, indicating generally positive feedback across these aspects.

This institution garners strong performance in student life, achieving the highest rating. Facilities, location, and value are also well-regarded. Professors and accommodation ratings are solid, while internationality is rated comparably. Overall, the university presents a positive profile with particular strengths in student engagement and practical aspects.

Impressive scores characterize this institution, particularly in its **facilities**, **location**, and **internationality**, all receiving perfect marks. Student experience is further bolstered by a commendable **student life** and a strong **professor** evaluation. However, **accommodation** presents a notable weakness with a score of 2, and the **value** proposition sits in the middle with a rating of 3.

Nothing to show

Excelling in key aspects, the institution boasts perfect scores for facilities, professors, and student life. Its value for money is also rated highly, with accommodation and internationality receiving solid marks. The primary area for improvement seems to be its location, which received a moderate rating compared to other categories.

This institution receives exceptionally high marks for its facilities and accommodation, both scoring an outstanding 4.7. Professors and internationality are also strong points, with ratings of 4.4. Student life and value for money are rated at 4.3 and 4.1 respectively. The university's location is its weakest area, though still a respectable 4.1.

Remarkably, this institution achieved a perfect score of 5 out of 5 in every evaluated category. The facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value are all considered outstanding. There are no apparent weak areas, as all aspects of the university have been rated at the highest possible level.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Most reviews (~74%) are positive, praising academic reputation, expert faculty, and excellent resources. A small percentage (~3.4%) express dissatisfaction with lecturing quality, course structure, or career services.

The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~75% of reviews rating it 4-5 stars. Students praise its strong research technologies, engineering, and pragmatic programs. A vibrant student city atmosphere is also a recurring highlight.

This university receives a strong average rating of 4/5, with approximately 100% of feedback being positive. Students highlight excellent industry connections, an international environment, and practical business education. The campus offers a balanced daily experience and diverse dining options.

Nothing to show

The sole review is overwhelmingly positive, with a 5/5 rating. Students highlight engaging professors, small class sizes fostering discussion, and unique gothic architecture. There's also appreciation for extracurricular opportunities.

Reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~0% negative feedback. Students praise the free tuition and wide range of masters specializations, highlighting a conducive academic and diverse environment.

Based on one review, the university received a perfect 5/5 rating. Positive feedback (~100%) highlights a comprehensive understanding of the Norwegian welfare model.

Rating distribution
5★
34%
63%
0%
0%
100%
29%
100%
4★
44%
13%
100%
0%
0%
57%
0%
3★
19%
25%
0%
100%
0%
14%
0%
2★
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Great Experience

LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close