London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs Cardiff Metropolitan University vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs Henley Business School vs University of Chester

Side-by-side comparison from 474 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: University of Wolverhampton (4.40)
London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE: wins 2/7 categories
Cardiff Metropolitan University: wins 1/7 categories
EM Normandie - EM Normandie: wins 0/7 categories
Henley Business School: wins 2/7 categories
University of Chester: wins 0/7 categories
University of Wolverhampton Business School: wins 0/7 categories
University of Wolverhampton: wins 2/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Economics
Cardiff, The United Kingdom
4.10
Read more reviews
77 reviews
×
Best programme: Software Engineering
Best programme: MSc International Logistics and Port Management
Reading, The United Kingdom
4.20
Read more reviews
5 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration in Management
Chester, The United Kingdom
4.20
Read more reviews
38 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
Wolverhampton, The United Kingdom
4.30
Read more reviews
7 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration in Management
Wolverhampton, The United Kingdom
4.40
Top
Read more reviews
18 reviews
×
Best programme: Biomedical Science
Category ratings
Facilities
4.04
4.34
Win
4.00
4.00
4.05
3.50
4.19
Location
4.78
Win
4.24
3.57
4.20
4.23
4.14
3.94
Professors
4.26
4.32
4.00
4.00
4.42
4.43
4.44
Win
Internationality
4.80
Win
4.29
4.14
4.40
3.99
3.86
4.06
Student life
3.63
3.92
3.71
4.40
Win
3.97
3.29
4.38
Value
4.04
4.18
4.00
3.80
4.05
3.86
4.22
Win
Accommodation
3.78
3.87
3.50
4.20
Win
4.00
3.86
3.60
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Expert and experienced faculty
  • +Supportive and collaborative community atmosphere
  • +Diverse and flexible learning and assessment methods
  • +Supportive faculty and comprehensive career services
  • +Excellent facilities and student life organization
  • +Strong academic programs with practical application
  • +Connecting theory to practice through real-world cases.
  • +Diverse international environment and global opportunities.
  • +Relevant industry-focused courses and knowledgeable faculty.
  • +Practical application of theory
  • +Strong academic programmes and career support
  • +Supportive environment and vibrant campus life
  • +Engaging curriculum with practical applications and hands-on learning
  • +Supportive and approachable lecturers passionate about teaching
  • +Friendly environment and strong sense of community
  • +Interactive, knowledgeable, and supportive lecturers
  • +Relevant, contemporary course content
  • +Strong preparation for future careers
  • +Strong student support and inclusive environment.
  • +High-quality teaching and knowledgeable lecturers.
  • +Relevant courses and career preparation.
Cons
  • -Poor teaching quality and lack of structure in academic programs.
  • -Inadequate support services and limited social opportunities.
  • -High fees with perceived low value and administrative issues.
  • -Poor communication and slow faculty responses are frustrating.
  • -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources hinder learning.
  • -Students struggle to access the limited services offered.
  • -Perceived as a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
  • -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities are a recurring complaint.
  • -Course content and teaching methods are often criticized.
  • -Poor quality teaching and unhelpful instructors.
  • -Lack of social integration and pressure to conform.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is a problem.
  • -Unreasonable payment deadlines conflicting with student finance release.
  • -Poor communication and unclear financial expectations.
Rating summary
What students say

Perceived strengths of this institution lie significantly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both receiving top marks. Conversely, **Student Life** emerges as the area with the lowest reported satisfaction. Ratings for Facilities, Professors, Accomodation, and Value fall within a moderate to good range, indicating generally positive feedback across these aspects.

This institution garners praise for its excellent **Facilities**, scoring a high 4.34. Professors also receive strong marks at 4.31, with Location and Internationality also performing well. Conversely, **Student Life** and **Accomodation** are areas with comparatively lower, though still respectable, ratings, falling below 4.0. The overall value is rated at 4.18.

This institution performs well across most aspects, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest area. Facilities, Professors, and Value also receive high marks. Areas for potential improvement include **Location**, which scored the lowest, and Accomodation. Student life and the overall value proposition are rated solidly in the mid-to-high range.

This institution demonstrates a strong performance in student life and internationality, both receiving high marks. Location and accommodation also score well. However, the university's weakest area is its value for money, which is rated lower than other aspects. Facilities and professors receive solid, above-average scores, indicating general satisfaction across these key areas.

This institution receives particularly strong marks for its **Professors**, who are rated highly. **Student Life** presents the lowest score among the surveyed aspects. Other areas like Facilities, Location, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value are generally well-regarded, falling within a positive range. The overall sentiment suggests a well-rounded university experience with a particular strength in its academic staff.

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its academic offerings, with Professors receiving a high rating of 4.43 and Location also scoring well at 4.14. Areas for potential improvement include Facilities, rated at 3.5, and Student Life, which received a 3.29. Accomodation, Internationality, and Value all achieved a respectable 3.86.

Performance across key university metrics shows a generally positive reception. Professors and student life emerge as the strongest areas, both receiving high marks. Accommodation, however, presents the weakest area according to these ratings. Internationality and value also score well, indicating broad strengths, while facilities and location fall in the middle of the spectrum.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Most reviews (~74%) are positive, praising academic reputation, expert faculty, and excellent resources. A small percentage (~3.4%) express dissatisfaction with lecturing quality, course structure, or career services.

With an average rating of 4.14/5 from 77 reviews, ~74% are positive, highlighting a well-resourced campus, helpful faculty, and organized student life. A small ~1.3% of feedback mentioned communication issues.

Most reviews (approximately 71%) highlight a positive learning atmosphere, inspiring professors, and valuable international experiences. A small amount of feedback (around 14%) suggests mediocrity and a focus on profit. The average rating is 3.86/5.

With an average rating of 4.2/5, ~80% of reviews are positive. Students highlight hands-on learning, strong career preparation, and supportive campus environments. No negative feedback was received.

Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting well-designed courses and supportive lecturers. A small minority of feedback, around 2.6%, expressed dissatisfaction with the academic program and social environment.

With an average rating of 4.29/5 from 7 reviews, ~86% of feedback is positive. Students highlight collaborative learning, knowledgeable and attentive lecturers, and preparation for life after university. No negative feedback was reported.

Strong support services and dedicated lecturers are frequently praised, creating a positive learning environment for ~89% of students. A small amount of feedback mentions issues with enrollment and payment processes.

Rating distribution
5★
34%
29%
43%
40%
42%
43%
67%
4★
44%
58%
29%
40%
37%
43%
22%
3★
19%
12%
14%
20%
18%
14%
6%
2★
2%
1%
0%
0%
3%
0%
0%
1★
1%
0%
14%
0%
0%
0%
6%
Most useful review
Most liked
Great Experience

LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.

Exceptional

Professors were very insightful, i formed a good network with my fellow students. The staff really welcomed me in a friendly manner. Business management degree was amazing. I did learn alot in this course, be it basic things or common practices needed in progression for your career. The city is beautiful, it's a student city which really helps you settle in quite easily.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close