Hochschule Fresenius vs ISG International Business School vs St. John's University vs Columbia University vs Baruch College

Side-by-side comparison from 134 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: ISG International Business School (4.50)
Hochschule Fresenius: wins 1/7 categories
ISG International Business School: wins 2/7 categories
St. John's University: wins 0/7 categories
Columbia University: wins 4/7 categories
Baruch College: wins 0/7 categories
School16: wins 0/7 categories
Chegg Skills: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Idstein, Germany
4.30
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Economics
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
New York City, United States
4.30
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Applied Chemistry
New York City, United States
4.40
Read more reviews
73 reviews
×
Best programme: Art and Design
New York City, United States
4.30
Read more reviews
50 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting
New York City, United States
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
New York City, United States
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
3.67
4.00
4.00
4.49
Win
4.06
Not rated
Not rated
Location
5.00
Win
4.50
4.50
4.36
4.29
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.00
4.50
Win
4.25
4.37
4.28
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
3.67
4.75
Win
4.25
4.44
4.30
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
3.33
4.25
4.00
4.35
Win
4.18
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.00
4.00
4.25
4.44
Win
4.24
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
3.00
3.25
3.75
4.22
Win
4.04
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Relevant and varied course content
  • +Helpful and educated faculty
  • +Supportive university staff
  • +International & multicultural environment, supportive atmosphere
  • +Dynamic professors, engaging and flexible programs
  • +Excellent alumni network, international opportunities
  • +Supportive supervisors and accessible postgraduate programs
  • +Abundant student organizations and walkable campus
  • +Helpful staff and faculty for student issues
  • +Supportive and passionate faculty
  • +Diverse and thoughtful food options
  • +Affordable and accessible accommodation
  • +Expert professors with real-world experience
  • +High-quality education in communications and literature
  • +Excellent facilities and supportive student life

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Lack of organization and clear communication from administration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
  • -Uninspiring teaching methods and irrelevant curriculum.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance create an unpleasant learning environment.
  • -Lack of resources and support hampers academic success.
  • -Administrative and management issues
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment
  • -Lack of resources and support
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are major drawbacks.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from instructors is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are common complaints.
  • -Poor teaching quality and unengaging course content are significant concerns.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

With a perfect score of 5, location stands out as the university's strongest asset. Student life, however, received the lowest rating at 3.33. Facilities and internationality scored a respectable 3.67, while professors and value were rated highly at 4. Accommodations were rated at 3.

This university demonstrates excellent strengths in **Internationality**, with a score of 4.75, and **Professors**, rated at 4.5. **Location** also receives a high mark of 4.5. While **Facilities**, **Student Life**, and **Value** are all well-regarded, the **Accomodation** is its weakest point, receiving a score of 3.25.

The university demonstrates a consistently strong performance across multiple aspects. Its location and internationality are particularly well-regarded, achieving the highest ratings. Professors and value also receive excellent scores. The weakest area appears to be accommodation, which, while still good, is rated lower than other categories. Student life and facilities are also solid, indicating a well-rounded experience.

An analysis of the provided ratings reveals a university that excels in several key areas. Facilities stand out with a score of 4.49, closely followed by Internationality and Value, both receiving 4.44. Professors and Location also score highly at 4.37. Student Life is rated well at 4.35. The lowest rated aspect is Accomodation, with a score of 4.22, suggesting this is an area for potential improvement.

This institution garners strong marks in several key areas, notably excelling in **Internationality** (4.3) and **Location** (4.29). **Professors** (4.28) and **Value** (4.24) also received high scores, indicating student satisfaction with teaching quality and affordability. **Accomodation** (4.04) and **Facilities** (4.06) represent the lowest-rated aspects, though still within a generally positive range.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%) with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise course content, helpful lecturers, and good accommodation. A few minor criticisms mention strict grading in one course and occasional unhelpful teachers.

All four reviews are positive, averaging 4.5/5 stars. Students appreciate the international environment, knowledgeable professors, and encouragement of entrepreneurial thinking. No negative feedback was received.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with a 4.25 average rating. Students highlight competitive programs, helpful supervisors, affordable postgraduate options, and engaging campus life with many organizations. A small amount of feedback noted recent tuition increases and changes post-pandemic.

University feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~99%), with students praising the engaging academics and passionate professors. Some mention food variety and accommodation limitations.

With an average rating of 4.28/5, ~94% of reviews are positive. Students highlight knowledgeable professors with real-world experience in communications and interpersonal selling, and an appreciation for literature's social impact. Facilities and student life also received praise.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
33%
50%
25%
42%
34%
0%
0%
4★
67%
50%
75%
52%
60%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
5%
6%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Well structured course

Basically, it’s a private university with a good reputation and also the lecturers are well educated and helpful. The course contains 60% of management-related modules and the remaining technical modules. For anyone who is searching for a techno-management course, I would suggest Hochschule Fresenius.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close