Swiss Federal Institute of Technology - ETH Zurich vs Polytechnic University Institute Bamenda - NPB vs University of Bamenda - Uba vs Chittagong Medical University vs Emily Carr University of Art and Design - ECUAD

Side-by-side comparison from 66 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Polytechnic University Institute Bamenda - NPB (4.80)
Swiss Federal Institute of Technology - ETH Zurich: wins 4/7 categories
Polytechnic University Institute Bamenda - NPB: wins 0/7 categories
University of Bamenda - Uba: wins 3/7 categories
Chittagong Medical University: wins 0/7 categories
Emily Carr University of Art and Design - ECUAD: wins 0/7 categories
Catholic University of Cameroon: wins 0/7 categories
Saint Louis University - Salusis: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Computer and Information Science
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
Chittagong, Bangladesh
3.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.28
Win
Not rated
3.60
3.50
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.25
Win
Not rated
3.93
3.00
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
3.76
Not rated
4.19
Win
3.50
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
4.26
Win
Not rated
3.81
2.50
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.20
Not rated
4.33
Win
3.50
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.54
Win
Not rated
4.19
3.50
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
3.05
Not rated
3.75
Win
3.00
2.00
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High-quality education and demanding curriculum
  • +Excellent digitalization and accessible learning platforms
  • +Vibrant campus life and strong student support systems
  • +Supportive and skilled staff providing academic and social guidance
  • +High-quality teaching and enthusiastic professors
  • +Affordable tuition and practical internship support
  • +Dedicated lecturers and strong academic programs
  • +Engaging learning environment with hands-on projects and extracurriculars
  • +Friendly, diverse atmosphere promoting culture and socialization

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a common complaint.
  • -A perceived lack of student support and engagement is a recurring negative.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of practical application and unclear career relevance is a concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Communication problems and poor faculty engagement are major concerns.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Assessing this university reveals a generally positive student experience. Value for money is outstanding, scoring highest, closely followed by internationality and facilities. Student life and location also receive strong endorsements. However, accommodation presents the weakest area, with a notably lower rating. Professors' ratings are respectable but fall below the other strong categories.

With identical ratings across all assessed categories, the university presents a uniform, though unexceptional, profile. No specific area stands out as particularly strong or weak. The institution's performance in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value is consistent, indicating a neutral standing across the board. Further review would be needed to understand the nuances behind these equal scores.

This institution presents a varied performance profile, with Student Life standing out as its strongest area, achieving a score of 4.33. Professors and Value also scored highly at 4.19. Conversely, Facilities received the lowest rating at 3.6, indicating this might be an area for improvement. Other aspects like Location, Internationality, and Accommodation fall within a respectable middle range.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.3/5 from 43 reviews, nearly all ~93% are positive. Students highlight an impressive academic environment, high teaching quality, and good digitalization. Some mention demanding workloads and variable organization.

With a 4.75/5 average from 4 reviews, sentiment is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students praise staff encouragement, good professors, and teaching quality, highlighting opportunities for academic and social growth.

With a 4.25/5 average rating, ~94% of reviews are positive. Students highlight strong academic programs and collaborative lecturers. Minor concerns mentioned include infrastructure and administrative issues.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
40%
75%
38%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
51%
25%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
9%
0%
13%
100%
100%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Geting a very deep understanding of the material.

Pro: Very good education. Con: Very high workload. We get tought more details and theory behind the concepts we learn than at other universities. However, this also shows in a higher workload. Nevertheless, it is very interesting. For student life, there are lots of great student associations, there is really something for everyone and plenty of events to attend or associations to join.

Low tuition fees university

Affordable university and here if you are not able to have a place for practical work internship, the school can help you with an internship placement at any of the available companies in the region. Also, i was able to learn a new language ( French ).

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close