The University of Manchester vs Alliance Manchester Business School vs General Assembly vs Mellor Financial Training vs Business Consort

Side-by-side comparison from 329 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
The University of Manchester: wins 0/7 categories
Alliance Manchester Business School: wins 0/7 categories
General Assembly: wins 4/7 categories
Mellor Financial Training: wins 0/7 categories
Business Consort: wins 0/7 categories
Bywater: wins 0/7 categories
Global Banking School: wins 3/7 categories
Comparing
Manchester, The United Kingdom
4.20
Read more reviews
306 reviews
×
Best programme: Mechanical Engineering
Manchester, The United Kingdom
4.10
Read more reviews
21 reviews
×
Best programme: International Management
New York City, United States
5.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Marketing
Manchester, The United Kingdom
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Manchester, The United Kingdom
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
London, The United Kingdom
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Birmingham, The United Kingdom
5.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Tourism Business
Category ratings
Facilities
4.32
4.50
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Location
4.52
4.59
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Professors
4.21
3.93
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Internationality
4.57
4.76
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Student life
4.39
4.34
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Value
4.11
4.08
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Accommodation
3.67
3.83
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Engaging teaching and strong student support
  • +Excellent online learning experience and materials
  • +Vibrant student life and inspiring campus environment
  • +Expert, passionate instructors and well-structured, relevant courses.
  • +Real-world experience through consulting projects.
  • +Strong student support and career preparation resources.
  • +Knowledgeable, supportive professors
  • +Abundant study resources and learning activities
  • +Networking opportunities

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Diverse teaching styles from various tutors
  • +Flexibility and adaptability fostered by module changes
Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of access to functional labs.
  • -Disorganized course structure and poor lecturer communication/accessibility.
  • -Ineffective teaching that doesn't relate to assignments or career goals.
  • -Outdated curriculum and irrelevant course content
  • -Inadequate facilities and poor infrastructure
  • -Insufficient teaching time due to project focus
  • -Outdated facilities and resources.
  • -Poor communication and administrative issues.
  • -Lack of practical application and relevant curriculum.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Inefficient administrative and communication processes.
  • -Poorly maintained and outdated facilities.
  • -Lack of engaging and relevant teaching.
Rating summary
What students say

This university garners strong praise for its **Internationality** (4.57) and **Location** (4.52). **Facilities** (4.32), **Student Life** (4.39), and **Professors** (4.21) also receive positive marks, with **Value** (4.11) holding steady. The area with the lowest rating is **Accomodation** (3.67), indicating a potential point for improvement.

The university garners exceptional ratings for its Internationality (4.76) and Location (4.59), indicating strengths in these aspects. Facilities also received a high score (4.50). Conversely, Accomodation (3.83) and Professors (3.93) received the lowest scores, suggesting these are areas for potential improvement. Student Life (4.34) and Value (4.08) fall in the middle range.

Overall, this institution garners strong commendations, particularly excelling in its facilities, location, student life, and accommodation, all receiving perfect scores. Professors and perceived value also score well, indicating solid academic and financial offerings. The weakest area identified is internationality, suggesting room for growth in attracting and supporting a global student body.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its teaching staff and international student experience, both receiving top marks. Its facilities, location, student life, and accommodation are also highly regarded, all scoring a solid four out of five. While value for money is also rated at a perfect five, the professors and internationality stand out as the university's most impressive attributes.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a ~86% positive sentiment, students praise online/distance learning, engaging teaching, and strong support. A small minority, ~1.3%, reported issues with course content and professor accessibility.

Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting knowledgeable instructors, relevant coursework, and career support. A small portion of feedback points to issues with program structure and facilities.

With a single review, this university is rated a perfect 5/5. The student highlighted excellent professors and abundant study resources. No negative feedback was received.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

The single review is highly positive, giving a 5/5 rating. This suggests overwhelmingly positive feedback, with approximately 0% negative sentiment. The reviewer appreciated the flexibility offered by having different tutors per module.

Rating distribution
5★
39%
52%
100%
0%
0%
0%
100%
4★
49%
24%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
11%
14%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
1%
5%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
1%
5%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Practical

The course content is well-structured and covers key areas such as digital forensics, threat intelligence, network security, incident response, and cyber risk management. One of the biggest strengths of the programme is its practical approach. Lab-based sessions, real-world case studies, and hands-on tools helped me understand how cyber attacks and investigations work in real scenarios. The lecturers are knowledgeable, supportive, and approachable, and they encourage critical thinking and independent research. The university also offers good learning resources, including online materials, libraries, and lab facilities. Group projects and assignments helped develop teamwork, problem-solving, and technical skills, which are very important for a career in cyber security. Overall, the programme prepared me well for further study and professional opportunities in the cyber security field. However, there are some areas that could be improved. In some modules, the workload was quite heavy within a short period, which made it challenging to manage deadlines. A few topics could have been explained in more depth, especially advanced threat intelligence and real-world industry tools. Additionally, more industry collaboration, internships, or career guidance would make the programme even stronger. Some technical resources and lab environments could also be updated to reflect the latest cyber security trends and technologies.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close