New York College European and American Education - NYC vs Metropolitan University of Tirana - UMT vs Faculty of Economics, University of Tirana - FEUT vs University of New York Tirana - UNYT vs Tirana Business University - TBU

Side-by-side comparison from 37 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Mediterranean University of Albania - MUA (5.00)
New York College European and American Education - NYC: wins 0/6 categories
Metropolitan University of Tirana - UMT: wins 0/6 categories
Faculty of Economics, University of Tirana - FEUT: wins 0/6 categories
University of New York Tirana - UNYT: wins 1/6 categories
Tirana Business University - TBU: wins 0/6 categories
Mediterranean University of Albania - MUA: wins 5/6 categories
Catholic University Our Lady of Good Counsel: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Business Informatics
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Informatics
Best programme: Animation
Best programme: Dentistry
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
3.67
2.28
3.67
Not rated
5.00
Win
3.33
Location
Not rated
3.67
3.76
4.33
Not rated
4.50
Win
3.33
Professors
Not rated
3.67
3.36
4.67
Not rated
5.00
Win
3.67
Internationality
Not rated
3.33
2.32
4.67
Win
Not rated
4.50
4.33
Student life
Not rated
3.67
2.36
4.00
Not rated
4.00
2.00
Value
Not rated
3.67
3.08
4.67
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.33
Accommodation
Not rated
3.33
2.20
4.00
Not rated
4.50
Win
3.33
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High-quality, multicultural education
  • +Excellent, experienced professors
  • +Strong business programs
  • +Expert faculty with international experience
  • +Modern facilities and infrastructure
  • +Valuable learning experiences and professional development
  • +Excellent academic programs and preparation for future careers.
  • +Qualified and approachable faculty.
  • +Good campus facilities and international opportunities.
  • +Quality programs and knowledgeable, supportive professors
  • +Engaging faculty and staff
  • +Good learning environment and opportunities

Nothing to show

  • +Hands-on training for job market competitiveness.
  • +Inspiring and flexible teaching.
  • +Experienced professors and practical, job-ready training
  • +Professors' willingness to teach and hands-on clinic experience
  • +Preparation for the job market post-graduation
Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern amenities frustrate students.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes and poor communication cause significant problems.
  • -Overcrowded classrooms and a lack of individual attention detract from the learning experience.
  • -Lack of genuine teacher engagement and student support.
  • -Perceived focus on financial gain over educational quality.
  • -Waste of money due to poor value.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor infrastructure.
  • -Lack of practical application and career support.
  • -Administrative and communication issues.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology impede learning.
  • -High costs are perceived as poor value for the educational experience.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues create constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder effective learning.
  • -Unresponsive communication from staff is a significant problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a constant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a significant drawback.
  • -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution presents a uniform, middling performance across all evaluated aspects. With zero ratings in categories spanning facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, there are no standout strengths or discernible weaknesses. The university's profile is entirely consistent, indicating an average experience in every surveyed area.

This institution garners consistently solid ratings across several key aspects, with facilities, professors, location, student life, and value all receiving a strong 3.67. The areas showing slightly lower, though still respectable, scores are accommodation and internationality, both averaging 3.33. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded experience with particular strengths in its core academic and extracurricular offerings.

When examining the university's performance across various categories, location stands out as the strongest area, receiving a high rating. Conversely, accommodation emerges as the weakest point, with the lowest score among the surveyed aspects. Other notable areas include professors and value, which received moderate ratings, while facilities, student life, and internationality scored lower.

This university is highly regarded, particularly excelling in its professors, internationality, and value, all receiving scores of 4.67. Student life, accommodation, and location also score well, with 4.33 to 4.0 ratings. The facilities represent the lowest-rated aspect at 3.67.

Nothing to show

This institution garners exceptionally high marks, notably achieving perfect scores for its facilities and professors. Student life, while positive, is the lowest-rated area at 4 out of 5. The university also scores well in location, accommodation, internationality, and value, all receiving 4.5 ratings. Overall, it presents a very strong offering to its students.

This institution excels in internationality and value, both receiving top marks. Facilities, location, and accommodation are rated moderately well. However, student life presents a significant area for improvement, indicated by its lowest score. Professor quality is also a strong point, but not as exceptional as internationalization and value.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a single review, the feedback is overwhelmingly positive. The reviewer highlights the high quality of multicultural education and academic collaborations. Professors are described as excellent with practical experience.

With an average rating of 3.67, reviews are mostly positive (~67%), highlighting quality private education, expert professors, and good infrastructure. A minority (~33%) express concerns about teaching quality and teacher engagement.

Roughly 32% of reviews are negative. Positive feedback highlights prepared professors and good programs, while negative comments cite poor facilities, outdated materials, and lack of practical application.

All three reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4/5. Students highlight good programs, knowledgeable faculty, and a supportive learning environment. No negative feedback was received.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 5/5, these two reviews are entirely positive. Students highlight hands-on training and inspiring, hardworking teachers, making them competitive in the job market.

Students highlight well-prepared professors and effective programs that prepare them for the job market. With a high average rating of 4/5 and no negative feedback, the sentiment is overwhelmingly positive.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
67%
4%
0%
0%
100%
33%
4★
100%
0%
32%
100%
0%
0%
33%
3★
0%
0%
32%
0%
0%
0%
33%
2★
0%
0%
16%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
33%
16%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Concerning FEUT

It has a lot of place for improvement in every aspect. It needs to work on it's facilities and schedules. It desperately needs to fix the heat system and all the classrooms. It lacks a lot when it comes to putting in practise what you been studying and should help it's students when it comes to finding an internship.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close