New York College European and American Education - NYC vs Epoka University - EPOKA vs Metropolitan University of Tirana - UMT vs Faculty of Economics, University of Tirana - FEUT vs University of New York Tirana - UNYT

Side-by-side comparison from 39 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Mediterranean University of Albania - MUA (5.00)
New York College European and American Education - NYC: wins 0/6 categories
Epoka University - EPOKA: wins 0/6 categories
Metropolitan University of Tirana - UMT: wins 0/6 categories
Faculty of Economics, University of Tirana - FEUT: wins 0/6 categories
University of New York Tirana - UNYT: wins 1/6 categories
Mediterranean University of Albania - MUA: wins 5/6 categories
Catholic University Our Lady of Good Counsel: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Business Informatics
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Informatics
Best programme: Animation
Best programme: Dentistry
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
4.00
3.67
2.28
3.67
5.00
Win
3.50
Location
Not rated
2.00
3.67
3.76
4.33
4.50
Win
3.50
Professors
Not rated
3.00
3.67
3.36
4.67
5.00
Win
4.00
Internationality
Not rated
3.00
3.33
2.32
4.67
Win
4.50
4.50
Student life
Not rated
2.00
3.67
2.36
4.00
4.00
2.25
Value
Not rated
3.00
3.67
3.08
4.67
5.00
Win
4.25
Accommodation
Not rated
3.00
3.33
2.20
4.00
4.50
Win
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High-quality, multicultural education
  • +Excellent, experienced professors
  • +Strong business programs

Nothing to show

  • +Expert faculty with international experience
  • +Modern facilities and infrastructure
  • +Valuable learning experiences and professional development
  • +Excellent academic programs and preparation for future careers.
  • +Qualified and approachable faculty.
  • +Good campus facilities and international opportunities.
  • +Quality programs and knowledgeable, supportive professors
  • +Engaging faculty and staff
  • +Good learning environment and opportunities
  • +Hands-on training for job market competitiveness.
  • +Inspiring and flexible teaching.
  • +High-quality education and dedicated, well-prepared professors
  • +Strong preparation for the job market
  • +Valuable resources and inspiring learning environment
Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern amenities frustrate students.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes and poor communication cause significant problems.
  • -Overcrowded classrooms and a lack of individual attention detract from the learning experience.

Nothing to show

  • -Lack of genuine teacher engagement and student support.
  • -Perceived focus on financial gain over educational quality.
  • -Waste of money due to poor value.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor infrastructure.
  • -Lack of practical application and career support.
  • -Administrative and communication issues.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology impede learning.
  • -High costs are perceived as poor value for the educational experience.
  • -Administrative and management issues create constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder effective learning.
  • -Unresponsive communication from staff is a significant problem.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities are a significant drawback.
  • -The curriculum lacks relevance and practical application.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution presents a uniform, middling performance across all evaluated aspects. With zero ratings in categories spanning facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, there are no standout strengths or discernible weaknesses. The university's profile is entirely consistent, indicating an average experience in every surveyed area.

Nothing to show

This institution garners consistently solid ratings across several key aspects, with facilities, professors, location, student life, and value all receiving a strong 3.67. The areas showing slightly lower, though still respectable, scores are accommodation and internationality, both averaging 3.33. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded experience with particular strengths in its core academic and extracurricular offerings.

When examining the university's performance across various categories, location stands out as the strongest area, receiving a high rating. Conversely, accommodation emerges as the weakest point, with the lowest score among the surveyed aspects. Other notable areas include professors and value, which received moderate ratings, while facilities, student life, and internationality scored lower.

This university is highly regarded, particularly excelling in its professors, internationality, and value, all receiving scores of 4.67. Student life, accommodation, and location also score well, with 4.33 to 4.0 ratings. The facilities represent the lowest-rated aspect at 3.67.

This institution garners exceptionally high marks, notably achieving perfect scores for its facilities and professors. Student life, while positive, is the lowest-rated area at 4 out of 5. The university also scores well in location, accommodation, internationality, and value, all receiving 4.5 ratings. Overall, it presents a very strong offering to its students.

This institution demonstrates significant strengths in its internationality, scoring an impressive 4.5, and offers excellent value with a rating of 4.25. Professors are also highly regarded at 4. Facilities and location are rated moderately at 3.5. Student life emerges as the weakest area, receiving a 2.25, while accommodation sits at a respectable 3.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a single review, the feedback is overwhelmingly positive. The reviewer highlights the high quality of multicultural education and academic collaborations. Professors are described as excellent with practical experience.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 3.67, reviews are mostly positive (~67%), highlighting quality private education, expert professors, and good infrastructure. A minority (~33%) express concerns about teaching quality and teacher engagement.

Roughly 32% of reviews are negative. Positive feedback highlights prepared professors and good programs, while negative comments cite poor facilities, outdated materials, and lack of practical application.

All three reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4/5. Students highlight good programs, knowledgeable faculty, and a supportive learning environment. No negative feedback was received.

With an average rating of 5/5, these two reviews are entirely positive. Students highlight hands-on training and inspiring, hardworking teachers, making them competitive in the job market.

With an average rating of 4.25/5, nearly all feedback is positive. Students praise the high quality of education, dedicated professors, and resources that prepare them for the job market.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
0%
67%
4%
0%
100%
50%
4★
100%
0%
0%
32%
100%
0%
25%
3★
0%
100%
0%
32%
0%
0%
25%
2★
0%
0%
0%
16%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
33%
16%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Concerning FEUT

It has a lot of place for improvement in every aspect. It needs to work on it's facilities and schedules. It desperately needs to fix the heat system and all the classrooms. It lacks a lot when it comes to putting in practise what you been studying and should help it's students when it comes to finding an internship.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close