New York College European and American Education - NYC vs Epoka University - EPOKA vs Polytechnic University of Tirana - UPT vs Faculty of Economics, University of Tirana - FEUT vs University of New York Tirana - UNYT

Side-by-side comparison from 44 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: University College of Beder (4.70)
New York College European and American Education - NYC: wins 0/5 categories
Epoka University - EPOKA: wins 0/5 categories
Polytechnic University of Tirana - UPT: wins 0/5 categories
Faculty of Economics, University of Tirana - FEUT: wins 0/5 categories
University of New York Tirana - UNYT: wins 1/5 categories
University College of Beder: wins 4/5 categories
The European University of Tirana - UET: wins 0/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Mathematics
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Informatics
Best programme: Information and Communication Technology
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
4.00
3.00
2.28
3.67
4.33
Win
3.50
Location
Not rated
2.00
4.20
3.76
4.33
4.67
Win
4.00
Professors
Not rated
3.00
3.14
3.36
4.67
4.67
4.50
Internationality
Not rated
3.00
2.57
2.32
4.67
Win
4.33
4.50
Student life
Not rated
2.00
2.50
2.36
4.00
4.67
Win
3.75
Value
Not rated
3.00
3.29
3.08
4.67
4.67
3.75
Accommodation
Not rated
3.00
2.17
2.20
4.00
4.33
Win
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High-quality, multicultural education
  • +Excellent, experienced professors
  • +Strong business programs

Nothing to show

  • +Excellent academic staff and quality of education
  • +Practical, well-equipped labs and strong technical programs
  • +Opportunities for personal growth and a rewarding experience
  • +Excellent academic programs and preparation for future careers.
  • +Qualified and approachable faculty.
  • +Good campus facilities and international opportunities.
  • +Quality programs and knowledgeable, supportive professors
  • +Engaging faculty and staff
  • +Good learning environment and opportunities
  • +Strong academic support and accessible professors
  • +Excellent library resources
  • +Great location and facilities
  • +Supportive and professional faculty
  • +Excellent facilities and resources
  • +Opportunities for personal and professional growth
Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern amenities frustrate students.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes and poor communication cause significant problems.
  • -Overcrowded classrooms and a lack of individual attention detract from the learning experience.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues, with a lack of consideration for student opinions and an unsupportive staff attitude.
  • -Outdated teaching methods and disorganized class structures.
  • -Insufficient facilities and equipment, particularly lacking for practical subjects.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor infrastructure.
  • -Lack of practical application and career support.
  • -Administrative and communication issues.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology impede learning.
  • -High costs are perceived as poor value for the educational experience.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a frequent complaint.
  • -Administrative issues and poor communication from staff are consistently disliked.
  • -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant and lacking practical application.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Ineffective or unengaging teaching methods are a common complaint.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution presents a uniform, middling performance across all evaluated aspects. With zero ratings in categories spanning facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, there are no standout strengths or discernible weaknesses. The university's profile is entirely consistent, indicating an average experience in every surveyed area.

Nothing to show

This institution presents a mixed review based on student feedback. Its strongest areas include Location, which received a high rating, and Value, indicating good return on investment. Conversely, Accomodation appears to be a significant weakness, scoring the lowest. Student Life and Internationality also received comparatively lower marks, while Facilities and Professors fall in the mid-range.

When examining the university's performance across various categories, location stands out as the strongest area, receiving a high rating. Conversely, accommodation emerges as the weakest point, with the lowest score among the surveyed aspects. Other notable areas include professors and value, which received moderate ratings, while facilities, student life, and internationality scored lower.

This university is highly regarded, particularly excelling in its professors, internationality, and value, all receiving scores of 4.67. Student life, accommodation, and location also score well, with 4.33 to 4.0 ratings. The facilities represent the lowest-rated aspect at 3.67.

This university garners impressive scores, with professors, location, student life, and value standing out as exceptionally strong areas, all receiving a perfect 4.67. Facilities and accommodation also score well at 4.33, alongside internationality. While no category falls below a strong rating, facilities and accommodation represent the relatively weakest aspects compared to the university's other highly praised attributes.

This university garners impressive scores, particularly excelling in **Professors** and **Internationality** with a perfect 4.5. Student Life and Value are also strong at 3.75. The main area for improvement seems to be **Accomodation**, receiving the lowest rating of 3, alongside Facilities at 3.5. Location also scores well at 4.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a single review, the feedback is overwhelmingly positive. The reviewer highlights the high quality of multicultural education and academic collaborations. Professors are described as excellent with practical experience.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 3.43/5, roughly 74% of students offer positive feedback, highlighting strong academic foundations, knowledgeable staff, and practical programs. However, approximately 28.6% of reviews note issues with administration, outdated facilities, and unsupportive staff.

Roughly 32% of reviews are negative. Positive feedback highlights prepared professors and good programs, while negative comments cite poor facilities, outdated materials, and lack of practical application.

All three reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4/5. Students highlight good programs, knowledgeable faculty, and a supportive learning environment. No negative feedback was received.

With 100% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.67/5, students praise strong teaching, helpful professors, and excellent library resources. They also highlight good programs and convenient locations.

With an average rating of 4.25/5 from 4 reviews, positive feedback (~100%) highlights professional and approachable professors, exceptional facilities, and personal growth opportunities. No negative reviews were provided.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
0%
29%
4%
0%
67%
50%
4★
100%
0%
14%
32%
100%
33%
25%
3★
0%
100%
29%
32%
0%
0%
25%
2★
0%
0%
29%
16%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
16%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Supportive professors and practical learning

he Polytechnic University of Tirana provides a solid foundation in technical and engineering fields. The professors are knowledgeable and supportive, and the study programs are practical. However, the administration can sometimes be slow, and more modern facilities would improve the student experience. Overall, I would recommend this university to students who want a strong academic background.

Concerning FEUT

It has a lot of place for improvement in every aspect. It needs to work on it's facilities and schedules. It desperately needs to fix the heat system and all the classrooms. It lacks a lot when it comes to putting in practise what you been studying and should help it's students when it comes to finding an internship.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close