EU Business School vs Sustainability Management School - SUMAS vs Rushford Business School vs University of Business And International Studies Geneva - UBIS vs International Institute in Geneva
Side-by-side comparison from 257 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Expert professors with real-world insights
- +International and diverse student community
- +Practical and engaging learning experiences
- +High-quality teaching and supportive instructors.
- +Excellent career services and networking opportunities.
- +Engaging campus life and diverse student community.
- +Flexible study schedules and diverse themes
- +High-quality faculty with global perspectives
- +Relevant MBA programs for career advancement
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Excellent and helpful online classes and lectures
- +Beautiful campus and vibrant student life
- +Strong academic reputation and international recognition
- +Expert faculty with international experience and industry connections.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Educational quality and resources are perceived as basic and lacking.
- -Poor support for extracurricular activities and issues with accreditation are noted.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Lack of transparency and poor communication are recurring problems.
- -Unprofessionalism and unresponsiveness from staff are highly criticized.
- -Lack of promised support and opportunities.
- -Poor post-enrollment communication.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are common complaints.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and insufficient support are problematic.
- -Administrative & management issues create frustration and inefficiency.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of career support and unclear future prospects cause concern.
This university exhibits notable strengths in its Internationality and Location, both scoring very highly. Student Life and Facilities also received positive marks. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating compared to other aspects. The University's Professors and Value fall in the mid-range, indicating areas for potential improvement.
This institution excels in its **Internationality**, earning a high rating of 4.5. However, significant weaknesses are evident in **Student Life** and **Accomodation**, both receiving the lowest score of 1. **Facilities** and **Value** also present areas for improvement with ratings of 1.5. While **Professors** scored moderately at 3, the university's **Location** also received a middling 2.5.
This institution receives excellent marks, with its **Facilities** standing out as the strongest area, earning a perfect 5. **Professors** also garner high praise at 4.9. **Student Life**, while still strong, is the relatively weakest aspect with a score of 4.4. The university demonstrates a solid all-around performance with high ratings in location, accommodation, internationality, and value.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution excels in several key areas, boasting perfect scores for Location, Student Life, and Accomodation. Facilities and Value also received strong marks. Professors and Internationality were rated well, though they represent the areas with slightly lower, yet still positive, scores compared to the university's standout features.
This institution presents a well-rounded profile, excelling particularly in Student Life and Internationality, both achieving perfect scores. Facilities, Professors, Location, and Accomodation are all rated highly at 4 out of 5. The sole area falling slightly below the top tier is Value, also rated at 4.
Around 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting knowledgeable professors, practical insights, and an international environment. A smaller portion (~7.8%) expresses concerns about disorganization and educational quality.
Both university reviews are negative, rating it 1/5. Recurring themes include administrative issues, unresponsiveness, and unprofessional management, leading to a strong negative sentiment (~100% of feedback).
Nearly all reviews are positive, praising program flexibility, diverse themes, and supportive faculty. A small percentage of feedback mentions unfulfilled promises and poor communication.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 3.5/5, positive feedback (~50%) highlights excellent online classes and a great learning environment. Negative feedback is negligible, representing ~0% of the total.
The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~100% of reviews being favorable. Students highlight excellent professors with international experience who provide valuable networking opportunities for jobs and internships.
Although I earned my bachelor degree at the University of York in UK, it was quite theoretical. I really started to bridge the learning gap between theory and practice only when I started to pursue my master degree in Business Analytics and Data Science at EU Business School in Barcelona. What stands out most in my current program is the university’s strong emphasis on practical experience. Our professors are not only scholars but also are successful business managers and data experts, as they are either the owners of successful organizations or individuals who took on top management roles in large corporations. Their teachings are more than just the syllabus in, they also provide personal experience in the area of niche markets, provide best practices in an industry, and always provoke our thinking with regard to the existing trends in higher education, business strategy, and innovation.
I am a recent graduate of this university and overall, I would not recommend this university to anyone looking to continue their education. Many of my classmates and I had consistent issues with the administration that hindered our learning and dampened our experience. When we tried to propose changes or discuss problems, the administration was not open to working with us. Response times were lengthy and grading was subjective, with no true transparency into how they were determined. This made many of us afraid to speak up, which is why I am doing so now, after I have secured my diploma today. The biggest disappointment for me was the lack of career services. Since this was heavily marketed to me when I was considering this school, I was shocked to learn there is no career office, no career fairs, and no real effort to connect students with alumni who could help us advance our careers. When I approached the administration about the career fair issue, they claimed that career fairs were only possible with the help of student council and that no students had run for a position this year. This was shocking news to me since the school did not hold an Autumn student council election and the Spring election took place less than 2 months before 21 of the 23 students were graduating, thus students would not have been able to make any real change in their remaining time. In my time at SUMAS I did learn a lot and was fortunate to have some great professors who equipped me with knowledge and tools for my career, and I am grateful to them. However, the quality of the education does not outweigh all of the issues we experienced which is why I do not recommend this school to others. ** carefully read their accreditation because they are not accredited by any of the big accreditation organizations that are widely recognized
I regret choosing Rushford Business School for my MBA. Despite detailed discussions and assurances from its president, Syed Tufail, none of the promised support or opportunities were delivered. Communication after enrollment was extremely poor, and the overall experience did not meet expectations. Sharing this to help others make informed decisions.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
