EU Business School vs Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne - EPFL vs IMI International Management Institute Switzerland vs IMD Business School vs INSEEC Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 241 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical learning & industry expert professors
- +Real-world application & career opportunities
- +Vibrant student life & global diversity
- +Strong research & innovation focus
- +Affordable tuition
- +Welcoming environment & clear processes
- +Expert and supportive faculty
- +Practical and relevant curriculum
- +Strong industry connections
Nothing to show
- +Practical, group-focused learning and professional initiation.
- +High-quality teaching and supportive faculty mentorship.
- +Strong professional network and vibrant student life.
- +Reputable programs and career enhancement
- +Valuable internship and job training networks
- +Opportunities for paid internships
- +Practical, interdisciplinary teaching
- +Pleasant atmosphere with lecturers and students
- +Good cafeteria food options
- -Administrative and management issues create disorganization and unhelpful staff.
- -The educational quality is basic, with little support for extracurriculars and outdated facilities.
- -The university is perceived as a business focused on profit over student education and well-being.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor technology hinder learning.
- -Lack of student support and communication creates dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Facilities and resources are often outdated and insufficient.
- -Course content and teaching quality fail to meet expectations.
Nothing to show
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
- -Lack of student support and responsiveness from administration.
- -Uninspiring curriculum and teaching methods.
- -Inconsistent and chaotic scheduling causes disruptions.
- -Material is not fully in English and local students are insular.
- -Teachers lack enthusiasm and suggest inadequate translation tools.
- -The program has too many minor subjects, hindering focus on core learning.
This university excels in **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring very highly. **Student Life** and **Facilities** also received favorable ratings. The **weakest area** for the institution is **Accomodation**, which received the lowest score among the evaluated aspects. **Value** and **Professors** fall in the mid-range, indicating areas with room for improvement.
The university demonstrates exceptional strengths in **Internationality** and **Facilities**, both receiving near-perfect scores. **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a lower rating compared to other aspects. Overall, the institution scores well in **Professors** and **Value**, with good marks also for **Student Life**. **Location** falls in the mid-range.
Across all assessed aspects, this institution garners universal acclaim. It received perfect scores in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, indicating an outstanding overall experience for students. There are no identified weak areas, with the university excelling consistently across every metric.
Nothing to show
This university demonstrates notable strengths in its **Location**, receiving a high rating of 4.64. **Student Life** and **Internationality** are also well-regarded. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower score of 2.5. Other aspects like **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Value** fall within a moderate to good range.
Offering an excellent academic experience, this institution shines with top marks in Professors and Location. Student Life is a notably weaker area, indicated by a lower rating. Facilities and Accomodation are well-regarded, with Internationality also receiving high scores. The Value for money presents an opportunity for improvement.
This institution excels in its **Location** and **Accomodation**, both scoring a strong 4.5 and 4 respectively. The **Professors** and **Student Life** also receive a solid 3.5. However, **Facilities** and **Internationality** present areas for improvement, each receiving a lower rating of 2.5. The university offers good **Value** at 4.
Most reviews (around 74%) are positive, highlighting practical learning and industry-expert professors. A smaller portion (~8.3%) of feedback expresses concerns about disorganization and basic education.
All four reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5 stars. Students praise the university's excellence in education and research, collaborative environment, and affordable cost.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating, the lone review is highly positive. It praises the management program and knowledgeable professors for providing a strong foundation and real-world insights.
Nothing to show
Most student feedback is positive (~63% 4-5 stars), highlighting excellent pedagogy, practical experiences, and supportive staff. The average rating is 3.81/5, with no negative reviews.
University student reviews are mixed, with a 2.5/5 average rating. Approximately 50% of feedback is negative, citing issues like chaotic scheduling and overlapping duties. Positive feedback highlights the school's reputation and internship opportunities.
With an average rating of 3/5, university student feedback is split evenly. Positive comments highlight practical teaching and a pleasant atmosphere, while negative points focus on limited space and international student integration challenges.
I love to take a path in a good environment to perform my ability to intend all the perspective that matches and are suitable for every student in daily lifestyle and work in a way which will be helpful for the needs or students to get higher oppurtuinitied
It is a great university, well ranked worldwide, with a beautiful view on the lac and the Alpes from the campus. The courses and the programs are really interesting, the teachers are smart, but you have to work a lot, specially during the first year of bachelor, which is a kind of selective year.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This university has a lot of qualities such as adapting to students in order to optimize learning, and the desire to confront the student as quickly as possible with the world of work. On the other hand, I would criticize this school for poorly disseminated information and a gloomy community life.
Usually I trust reviews and they have never let me down, until 2023, when I chose to continue the bsc culinary course at this place. I wish someone told me this before my “study” there. First, I couldn’t get my proper classes schedule for 3 weeks. When the schedule finally came, it was chaotic, with daily kitchen duties overlapping with theoretical classes (By the way, I have No complaints about most of the theoretical classes, they were rare for culinary students but to the point and interesting - the only one plus). The kitchen duties were overwhelming, covering 24 days a month, and I almost never had the chance to attend a practical cooking class or even write down a single recipe, as all practical part was under MIT - people who working for HTMI as volunteers to get 1 year Swiss visa. These MIT used to talk with me very badly and always gave the task to clean or bring/peal for them vegetables, they directly told us that culinary students here to work, not enjoy their study. There was no culinary instructor for my course. And almost every event on Friday for students I had to be all day in the kitchen to cook for HTMI and after clean kitchen. I felt like I was working as a servant at the school, preparing meals and performing tasks for the kitchen MIT. The quality of the food was poor, sometimes even totally vegetarian days, and everything was prepared by the students, with the exception of desserts. Desserts were prepared with pastry students, but even pastry chef visits to the main kitchen were rare, and his desserts plating was outdated (like previous century, no one plate this way now in fine dining restaurants. Anyway, at least one teacher whom I sometimes even had to beg to attend his classes instead of “learning” how to clean kitchen and steam rice from MIT) They even taught us to plate dishes in a clock style 🤣) In the event planning class, we were expected to find our sponsors to organize an event as a part of the study, which forced us to seek support from local hotels and supermarkets, couldn’t really do it… They also forgot to give me my iPad in the beginning, when I asked, they say I’m trying to cheat them. I also had to pay my insurance twice. I was hoping on internship, but even that was below then Macdonalds level, i had to prepare sandwiches and salads for hotel staff, HTMI career center that time stoped replying my emails.. The experience was so depressing that I had to take antidepressants to cope with the stress. I strongly recommend that parents of prospective students look elsewhere in Switzerland and avoid these scams. I’m also attaching pictures from our “culinary classes” with MIT and accordingly the same food that was given to the students for 3500 franks per 12 weeks. Thank you for the attention 🙏🏼
What I liked: -Sustainable concerns of the school -Partnership with Social Education University in order to deliver social related modules What I didn't like while being registered to an international program: -Some material modules are still in German, some teachers suggested to translate them on Deepl -Local students are not very open-minded... tend to create their own circles and don't include international students -Even though the program is supposed to be taught in English, more minors are given in German than in English, which reduces the minors choices to 3 only... To improve: -Class materials and/or explanations can be given in English even though the student asked a question in Swiss-German (more inclusive) -More inclusive events, even though students can not be forced to take part in them, help international students to be included by locals Recommend? : I do not think that I would recommend international students to study there. I studied one year in Geneva, and the international program there is more inclusive than the one in Lucerne.
