EU Business School vs IU International University of Applied Sciences vs University of Kiel vs University of Applied Sciences Kiel - FH KIEL vs Schiller International University
Side-by-side comparison from 397 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Helpful professors and career support
- +Valuable practical and theoretical business knowledge
- +Enriching overall student experience
- +Flexible online study for work-life balance
- +Modern, intuitive digital platform for easy access
- +Relevant, high-quality educational content
- +Rigorous chemistry foundation prepares for advanced studies.
- +Practical and theoretical learning through well-designed curricula.
- +Strong emphasis on job-relevant skills and future career prospects.
- +Opportunities for international and multicultural exposure.
- +Diverse student and educator backgrounds
- +Opportunities for personal and professional growth
- +Helpful staff and organized curriculum
- +Integrated business and technology education for practical application.
- +Small class sizes and personal lecturer/staff interaction.
- +Strong focus on entrepreneurship and innovation.
- +Practical, career-focused learning
- +Supportive professors
- +Challenging workload
- -Administrative and management issues cause disorganization and lack of support.
- -Outdated facilities and a focus on attendance over quality education are criticized.
- -The educational program is perceived as basic and unaccredited in some regions.
- -Slow and unresponsive administrative processes, including grade processing and student support.
- -Poor staff attitude and lack of accountability for errors in student records and applications.
- -Inadequate support and guidance for online students.
- -Lack of support for international students and a significant language barrier.
- -Social science programs are underdeveloped.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a frequent complaint.
- -Students express dissatisfaction with administrative inefficiencies and poor communication.
- -The curriculum is often described as irrelevant or lacking practical application.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant problems.
- -Lack of extracurriculars and career support limits student experience.
- -Teaching quality varies and some courses lack depth.
- -Administrative and management issues are a major source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently criticized.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are recurring complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of transparency are recurring problems.
This institution excels in several key areas, with Location and Internationality receiving the highest marks at 4.73. Student Life also scores well at 4.22. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, scoring 3.42, suggesting room for improvement. Facilities and Professors are rated consistently around 4.04, while Value sits at a respectable 3.87.
This institution garners notable praise in several key areas, with **Internationality** and **Professors** receiving particularly high scores. The **Value** proposition is also well-regarded. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the lowest-rated aspect. Other aspects like Facilities, Location, and Student Life fall within a more moderate range of positive feedback.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in its facilities, earning a respectable 3.5 out of 5. Conversely, areas requiring improvement include accommodation, rated at a low 2, and professors, location, and student life, all scoring 2.5. While internationality is rated moderately at 3, the university's value for money stands out as its strongest attribute, achieving a high 4.
Considering the provided ratings, the university presents a uniformly neutral profile, with no specific areas standing out as particularly strong or weak. Every surveyed aspect, including facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, received a rating of zero. This suggests a consistent, albeit unremarkable, performance across all evaluated facets of the university experience.
This university is highly rated, particularly excelling in **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring an impressive 4.87. **Professors** also receive strong marks at 4.53. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.62. **Facilities** are also on the lower end at 3.93, though **Student Life** and **Value** are rated positively around 4.1.
This institution garners exceptional ratings in several key areas. Professors and accommodation stand out with perfect scores, indicating a highly valued academic staff and excellent housing options. Student life and facilities also received near-perfect marks, suggesting a vibrant campus environment and well-equipped resources. Conversely, internationality and value represent the weaker aspects, with ratings of 4.4, suggesting potential areas for enhancement in global engagement and affordability.
Across all assessed metrics, this institution achieves a perfect score of 5 out of 5. Every aspect, from its modern facilities and distinguished professors to its vibrant student life and advantageous location, is rated exceptionally. Furthermore, the accommodation options, international atmosphere, and overall value for money are all considered outstanding. There are no apparent weakest areas, with uniformly excellent feedback.
Around 74% of reviews are positive, praising professors, career services, and valuable skills gained. The remaining ~7.6% of feedback expresses concerns about disorganization and the quality of education.
~95% of reviews are positive, praising flexibility, modern platforms, and accessible materials. A small percentage (~5%) mention issues with grading delays and slow administrative support.
With a 2.5/5 average rating from two reviews, sentiment is split evenly. One reviewer highlights challenging but rewarding chemistry studies, while the other notes shortcomings in social sciences and minimal support for international students.
Students highlight excellent laboratory facilities, a well-designed curriculum for practical and job-related knowledge, and good international exposure. The average rating is 4/5, with positive feedback representing 100% of reviews.
The university is highly praised for its diverse student body, rich learning experiences, and opportunities for personal and career growth. However, about 13% of reviews mention inconsistent teaching quality and administrative issues.
All 6 reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5 stars. Students highlight the strong focus on technology and entrepreneurship, practical learning, and a welcoming atmosphere. No negative feedback was reported.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating, students highly recommend HAW Kiel, praising its practical, career-focused approach and engaging professors. There is no negative feedback.
As far as universities go I think EU business school comes first in terms of student-staff relationship. Every member of the staff I have encountered has been more than helpful. What i think should improve as even tho its not connected to my previous point is I think the school should have more leniency towards tuition payment specially to international students because we are here despite the challenges of having to find willing banks to exchange local currencies to Euros.
My experience with IU is very wonderful and exceptional. The learning process is smooth and easy especially for online students and the exams are well tailored to test your knowledge on what you have been learning. It is quite great indeed.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.
This was the best Varsity ever. The professionalism is on the high level. I have no dislikes and I highly recommend it to people who are struggling with focus. It's takes special students with disabilities.
Nothing to show
