EU Business School vs Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich - LMU vs Technical University of Munich - TUM vs Macromedia University of Applied Sciences vs Globe Business College Munich
Side-by-side comparison from 408 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Helpful professors and career support
- +Valuable practical and theoretical business knowledge
- +Enriching overall student experience
- +High-quality teaching and practical experience
- +Strong academic reputation and international environment
- +Well-organized programs with personalization options
- +Flexible and diverse program options
- +High academic standards and career prospects
- +Supportive professors and student community
- +Broadened horizons and excellent networking
- +Valuable real-world experience through company work
- +Supportive and understanding staff
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Excellent teaching and knowledgeable professors
- +Modern facilities and resources
- +Strong academic programs and career opportunities
- -Administrative and management issues cause disorganization and lack of support.
- -Outdated facilities and a focus on attendance over quality education are criticized.
- -The educational program is perceived as basic and unaccredited in some regions.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant concern.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently mentioned.
- -Course content is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered.
- -Administrative and management issues hinder academic progress and student well-being.
- -Ineffective and unhelpful legal representation exacerbates problems.
- -Poor quality of education and lecturer qualifications.
- -High tuition fees disproportionate to class availability and contact hours.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources frustrate students.
- -Inflexible and unresponsive administrative and management issues cause significant problems.
- -Poor communication and inadequate support create a negative learning experience.
This institution excels in several key areas, with Location and Internationality receiving the highest marks at 4.73. Student Life also scores well at 4.22. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, scoring 3.42, suggesting room for improvement. Facilities and Professors are rated consistently around 4.04, while Value sits at a respectable 3.87.
This institution garners strong marks across the board. Its **facilities** stand out with the highest rating at 4.27. The **value** proposition is also highly regarded, scoring 4.25. Areas like **professors**, **location**, and **student life** are all rated around 4.19-4.20, indicating solid performance. **Accommodation** is the relatively weakest area, though still positive at 4.04. **Internationality** also scores well at 4.15.
This university garners excellent marks, particularly in **Internationality** (4.29) and **Facilities** (4.22). **Value** (4.20) and **Location** (4.19) also receive high scores. While **Student Life** (3.93) and **Accomodation** (3.75) are the lowest-rated aspects, they remain reasonably positive, suggesting a generally well-regarded institution.
Examining the university's ratings reveals a mixed but generally positive picture. The institution excels particularly in **Internationality**, earning a high score. Strong performance is also noted for **Location** and **Professors**. Conversely, **Accomodation** and **Value** received the lowest ratings, indicating areas for potential improvement.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Across numerous categories, this institution receives commendable evaluations. Its professors are particularly well-regarded, followed closely by its facilities and internationality. The university also scores well in student life and value. Location is a solid strength. The weakest area identified is accommodation, with a significantly lower rating compared to other aspects.
Around 74% of reviews are positive, praising professors, career services, and valuable skills gained. The remaining ~7.6% of feedback expresses concerns about disorganization and the quality of education.
Reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~98%), with an average rating of 4.08/5. Students praise the high quality of teaching, practical project opportunities, and enriching international environment. Negative feedback is negligible.
Nearly all reviews are positive, highlighting flexible academic systems, diverse specializations, and good career prospects (~98%). A small amount of negative feedback mentions scheduling conflicts and administrative issues.
With an average rating of 3/5 from three reviews, approximately 67% of feedback is negative. Students cite concerns about academic quality and value for money. One positive review highlighted broad horizons and networking opportunities.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With a 4.5/5 average rating from 4 reviews, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Recurring themes include great facilities, excellent teaching, and a motivating academic environment. No negative feedback was reported.
As far as universities go I think EU business school comes first in terms of student-staff relationship. Every member of the staff I have encountered has been more than helpful. What i think should improve as even tho its not connected to my previous point is I think the school should have more leniency towards tuition payment specially to international students because we are here despite the challenges of having to find willing banks to exchange local currencies to Euros.
There are superior facilities at the FH Aachen. The tutorial halls and classes are sophisticated, equipped with the the current and innovative equipment, and the library is large and well-stocked. To guarantee that students have a positive college experience, the educational facility also offers a range of extracurricular activities and events.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
