The University of Melbourne - UoM vs RMIT University vs Swinburne University of Technology vs Torrens University Australia vs Monash University
Side-by-side comparison from 318 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Academic excellence and personal growth
- +Extensive support systems and networking opportunities
- +Excellent facilities and resources
- +Practical and industry-focused learning
- +Real-world experience from professors
- +Engaging and relevant coursework
- +Comprehensive curriculum with practical skills emphasis
- +High-quality teaching and supportive instructors
- +Opportunities for electives, exchange programs, and work-integrated learning
- +Engaging and interactive classes with knowledgeable and passionate professors
- +Flexible learning options catering to working students
- +Practical, real-world experience emphasized
- +High-quality teaching and supportive faculty
- +Excellent facilities and modern campus environment
- +Diverse community and valuable personal development opportunities
- +Life-changing educational experience and career readiness
- +Supportive community and valuable peer connections
- +Excellent study environment and resources
- +Exceptional chef instructors and curriculum quality.
- +Strong emphasis on skill development and practical experience.
- +Valuable international reputation and alumni network.
- -Administrative and student service issues are frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a concern for many students.
- -Unfair academic competition and workload distribution are frustrating.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant student frustration and lack of support.
- -Industrial action negatively impacts students with delayed feedback and limited staff assistance.
- -Teachers are unhelpful and actively work against students' success.
- -Administrative and management issues are prevalent.
- -Administrative and management issues like course changes and unclear enrollment practices.
- -High costs and questionable value for money regarding tuition fees.
- -Inconsistent quality of teaching staff and potentially rude or untrained facilitators.
- -Lack of practical, industry-relevant learning and underwhelming course content.
- -Insufficient career opportunities and support services.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
- -Lack of clear communication and administrative inefficiencies cause frustration.
- -The curriculum is perceived as unengaging and disconnected from real-world applications.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment.
- -Poor communication and administrative support.
- -Lack of practical application and relevance in coursework.
This institution excels particularly in **Internationality**, scoring a high 4.52. **Location** also received strong marks at 4.42, followed closely by **Facilities** at 4.38. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the lowest score at 3.82, indicating a potential area for improvement. Other categories, including Professors, Student Life, and Value, fall within a solid mid-4 range.
Professors stand out as the university's strongest asset, earning a stellar 4.477 rating. Facilities and Value also received favorable scores above 4.2. The lowest-rated aspect, however, is Accommodation, coming in at 3.886. Overall, the institution demonstrates a solid reputation, particularly in its academic and financial offerings.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in **Internationality** and **Location**, both scoring exceptionally high. Its **Facilities** and **Value** also receive very positive marks. The **Accomodation** category, however, stands out as the lowest-rated aspect, suggesting an area for potential improvement. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded experience with particular advantages in global reach and its physical setting.
This institution demonstrates strengths in its **Location**, receiving the highest rating. Conversely, **Student Life** stands out as the area requiring the most attention, with the lowest score. Other aspects like Facilities, Professors, and Value are rated similarly and fall in the mid-range. Accomodation and Internationality also received respectable, though slightly lower, scores compared to the strongest category.
Remarkably high marks were achieved in several areas, with Internationality (4.49) and Professors (4.48) standing out as the strongest aspects. Facilities also scored well at 4.35. Conversely, Accomodation emerged as the lowest-rated category at 3.74. The university also received solid scores for Student Life (4.16), Location (4.08), and Value (4.25), indicating a generally positive, though not uniformly exceptional, student experience.
This institution receives outstanding marks across the board, with perfect scores awarded for facilities, professors, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. Its only slight deviation from a perfect score is in location, which still garners a very respectable rating. The university's strengths are clearly in its comprehensive offerings and student experience.
Performance varies across key aspects of university life. Outstanding ratings were awarded for Location (4.75) and Professors (4.625), alongside strong marks for Internationality (4.625) and Facilities (4.5). Student Life (3.875) and Value (4.125) received good scores. Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.
Approximately 98% of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent faculty, supportive services, and diverse opportunities. A small portion of feedback (~2%) mentions issues with opportunity provision and student service availability.
Approximately 96% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical, industry-focused learning and experienced faculty. A small percentage (~3%) mention administrative issues and industrial action impacting studies.
Approximately 94% of reviews are positive, highlighting comprehensive curriculum, good teaching quality, and diverse electives. A small percentage of feedback expressed concerns about faculty.
~63% of reviews are positive, praising flexible learning, passionate professors, and engaging classes. ~37.5% of feedback is negative, citing course changes and high costs.
The university garners high praise, with ~96% positive reviews. Students highlight knowledgeable faculty, modern facilities, and diverse programs. A small percentage (~3.4%) mentioned concerns about cost-cutting and less practical learning experiences.
With an average rating of 5/5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive. Students highlight life-changing experiences, strong support systems, quality education, and career readiness. They also appreciate university events, study spaces, and library resources.
All eight student reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.63/5. Students highly praise the knowledgeable instructors, quality curriculum, and enriching learning experience.
The university provides a stable academic framework. The learning process is never hurried, and classes move at a good clip. Teachers ensure that everyone understands their material by bringing a calm professionalism to each session. This strategy is supported by the facilities, which include well-functioning labs, tidy study areas, and well-organized classrooms. The campus itself is quiet and functional, which aids students in focusing on their work. It's a friendly, focused environment for making consistent academic progress.
Unfortunately, I had to go to RMIT University in Australia, and I have to admit that it was the most disappointing and unpleasant experience of my life. It was immediately apparent that this establishment was not at all what it purported to be—a prominent university. First and foremost, dealing with the RMIT administration is a complete headache. They are uncoordinated, unresponsive, and don't appear to care about genuinely assisting kids in succeeding. I had to wait weeks for a simple inquiry to be resolved, and even then, the answers I got were sometimes wrong or conflicting. The quality of education at RMIT is also severely lacking. Many of the professors are disinterested and seem to have no real passion for teaching. The curriculum is outdated, and the coursework often feels irrelevant to real-world applications. It's clear that the university is more concerned with making a profit than actually providing a quality education. The facilities at RMIT are in a sorry state as well. The classrooms are cramped and outdated, and the library is sorely lacking in resources. It's as if the university is stuck in the past and has no interest in investing in modern facilities for its students. Perhaps the most frustrating aspect of my time at RMIT was the lack of support for students. There is a complete lack of career services and guidance for students looking to enter the job market. It's as if the university expects you to figure it all out on your own. In summary, I would strongly advise anyone considering RMIT University in Australia to think twice. The administration is a mess, the education is subpar, and the lack of support for students is disheartening. Save yourself the time, money, and frustration and look elsewhere for your education.
They are thugs. Don't ever go to them. The teachers are part of the cartel who do not help students to let them fail and earn millions of dollars. Infrastructure is the best but the teachers are the worst.
I want to share my experience with Torrens University. They initially gave me an offer letter and Confirmation of Enrollment (COE), but after I had been in the course for a year, they changed the name of the course and added more subjects to my study plan. It really feels like Torrens is using this format to make more money from students. This kind of practice is frustrating and makes it hard for us to plan our studies effectively.
The degree matched its expectation and was in line with goals set before starting the degree. The most important aspect of the degree was to build the latest skills in my domain and be able to interact with the industry. Both of these were well provided by the university. Would definitely recommend it to others.
Nothing to show
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
