Newcastle University vs BI Norwegian Business School - BI vs University of Bergen vs NHH Norwegian School of Economics vs Justice Institute of British Columbia - JIBC
Side-by-side comparison from 155 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent academic programmes and dedicated professor support
- +Strong careers support and practical skill development
- +Vibrant student life with diverse societies and social opportunities
- +Knowledgeable lecturers and strong academic environment
- +Practical approach and industry connections
- +Good location and food variety
- +Excellent academic programs and knowledgeable professors
- +Strong student support services and welfare provisions
- +Vibrant international community and city-integrated campus life
- +Free tuition and diverse program options
- +High quality education and international exchange opportunities
- +Supportive environment and welcoming community
- +Academic excellence and reputation
- +Diverse and engaging course content
- +Opportunities for practical experience and real-world application
- +Welcoming atmosphere & supportive professors
- +Strong academic programs
- +Conducive learning environment
- +Flexible online format and structure
- +Career-focused and practical learning
- +Supportive instructors and engaging lectures
- -Lack of academic and personal support
- -Minimal resources and effort from support teams
- -Perception of being a "money grab"
- -Students dislike the lack of proper support and communication from staff.
- -They often complain about outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources.
- -Students express frustration with the curriculum and teaching methods being unengaging or irrelevant.
- -Outdated or problematic lecture streaming software hinders communication with instructors.
- -Administrative and management issues create a frustrating student experience.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring concern.
- -Poor teaching quality and curriculum relevance are often criticized.
- -Inconsistent or poor communication from staff and administration.
- -Inconvenient or unreliable technology and facilities.
- -Lack of responsiveness to student concerns and issues.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Facilities are often described as outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Course content and teaching methods are perceived as unengaging and irrelevant.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
- -Lack of clear communication and support creates a negative student experience.
This university presents a strong showing, particularly excelling in **Location** with a rating of 4.75 and **Student Life** at 4.69. Facilities also received a very favorable score of 4.52. The weakest area appears to be **Value**, scoring 4.11, though most other categories, including Professors, Accommodation, and Internationality, also hover around the 4.2 to 4.3 mark, indicating a generally positive, albeit slightly less exceptional, performance.
This institution demonstrates remarkable strengths, with exceptional ratings for its Facilities, Professors, and Location, all scoring an impressive 4.5. Student Life and Internationality also receive solid marks at 4. However, Accommodations and Value emerge as areas needing development, each receiving a lower score of 3.
This institution demonstrates excellent performance, with student life and location receiving the highest marks at approximately 4.43 and 4.33 respectively. Facilities, accommodation, and internationality are all rated a solid 4. Professors represent the weakest area, scoring 3.86. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded experience, with particular strengths in its vibrant student community and convenient setting.
This institution receives exceptionally high marks for its facilities and accommodation, both scoring an outstanding 4.7. Professors and internationality are also strong points, with ratings of 4.4. Student life and value for money are rated at 4.3 and 4.1 respectively. The university's location is its weakest area, though still a respectable 4.1.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in its **facilities**, **professors**, and **location**, all receiving solid 4-star ratings. Conversely, **student life**, **accommodation**, and **internationality** present significant areas for improvement, each scoring a low 1 star. The university achieves a moderate 3-star rating for **value**, indicating a mixed overall experience with clear areas of excellence and notable challenges.
Across all assessed aspects, this institution demonstrates outstanding performance. It achieves a perfect score of 5 out of 5 in every category, including facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. This indicates a consistently excellent offering with no discernible weakest areas among the evaluated metrics.
This institution demonstrates significant strengths in **Professors** and **Internationality**, both receiving top scores of 4.5. **Value** also stands out at a high 4.5. Conversely, **Location** received the lowest rating at 3. The remaining areas of Facilities, Student Life, and Accommodation are rated solidly at 3.5, indicating a generally positive, though not exceptional, experience in these aspects.
With an average rating of 4.38/5 from 135 reviews, ~92% of feedback is positive. Students praise excellent societies, sports, career support, and academics, while a small amount (~0.7%) of negative feedback mentioned limited master's level support.
With an average rating of 4/5, student feedback is highly positive. Reviewers consistently praise the great location, knowledgeable lecturers, and strong academic environment. Industry connections and a practical approach to education were also highlighted.
With a 4.14/5 average, reviews are overwhelmingly positive, highlighting a good learning environment and student welfare services. A small percentage (~14.3%) of feedback mentioned issues with lecture streaming software.
Reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~0% negative feedback. Students praise the free tuition and wide range of masters specializations, highlighting a conducive academic and diverse environment.
With a single review and an average rating of 4/5, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. The lone review suggests strong recognition and interesting courses, though one point mentioned international student programs being overrated and expensive with limited domestic exposure.
The single review is overwhelmingly positive, rating the university 5/5. Students highlight an inviting atmosphere, understanding professors, strong programs, and a home-like environment. No negative feedback was received.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Reviews highlight convenience and structure in online formats, alongside supportive instructors and career-focused, practical learning.
The facilities of the school of computing are great - very modern building, newest equipment, campus located in the city centre (most likely you don’t need to commute there by metro or a bus). One major thing however that is lacking is the organisation. Being a third-year student I still have the same feeling - the program is written very chaotically. In 2019 there was that revolution of the programme (to keep learning the newest technology) to which lectures and demonstrators still feel a bit unadapted. I hope this will get better in the next year or two years. However, after that time, the taught technology may change again (which is good) and it will take another couple of years for the lecturers to be fluent in what they teaching (which is not good).
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
