Newcastle University vs Edge Hill University - EHU vs Northumbria University vs Newcastle University Business School vs INSEEC Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 355 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong career services and practical curriculum.
- +Supportive academic and social environment.
- +Inspiring city and excellent university facilities.
- +Student-centered support and opportunities
- +Beautiful campus and resources
- +Relevant and industry-experienced lecturers
- +Welcoming environment & community building
- +Strong academic programs & practical learning
- +Excellent student support & career guidance
- +Strong academic programs with real-world application
- +Passionate and supportive professors
- +Practical skill development and well-structured curriculum
- +Practical, group-focused learning and professional initiation.
- +High-quality teaching and supportive faculty mentorship.
- +Strong professional network and vibrant student life.
- +Flexible and accessible distance learning
- +Practical, real-world application of knowledge
- +Ability to study at own pace while working
- +International relevance & practical/hands-on experience
- +Welcoming & supportive environment with friendly, helpful staff/faculty
- +Diverse, small classes with experienced professors
- -Lack of academic and personal support at the masters level.
- -Perceived as a "money grab" with minimal resources and effort from support teams.
- -Inadequate support systems for students' needs.
- -Poor administrative responsiveness and management.
- -Lack of comprehensive career guidance beyond specific paths.
- -Program structure is poorly designed and lacks practical application.
- -Courses are irrelevant and do not prepare students for job markets.
- -Lack of career support and teaching staff unsupportive.
- -Administrative & management issues
- -Outdated facilities & poor technology
- -Lack of career support & guidance
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
- -Lack of student support and responsiveness from administration.
- -Uninspiring curriculum and teaching methods.
- -Outdated or poorly developed course content.
- -Ineffective instruction and lack of expert guidance.
- -Poor communication and administrative issues.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are often criticized.
- -Poor teaching quality and unengaging course content are commonly cited.
This institution garners exceptional scores, particularly in **Location**, which received a near-perfect rating. **Student Life** and **Facilities** also show significant strengths. The university's weakest area, though still good, is **Value**. **Professors** and **Accomodation** are also rated favorably, contributing to a generally positive assessment of the university.
Across various metrics, this institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in its **Facilities**, which received a high rating of 4.38. **Professors** and **Accomodation** also scored well, both above 4.2. Conversely, **Internationality** emerged as the lowest-rated area at 3.56, suggesting room for improvement in global engagement. **Student Life** and **Value** also received respectable, though slightly lower, scores.
This university garners particularly strong scores in **Location** (4.55) and **Student Life** (4.48), indicating positive student experiences in these aspects. Facilities also receive a high mark at 4.42. The **Accommodation** category shows the lowest rating at 4.02, suggesting this is an area that could be improved, though it remains a respectable score overall. Internationality, Professors, and Value are all rated positively in the low to mid-4s.
This university garners strong marks across multiple facets. Its strongest areas are Location and Student Life, both scoring an impressive 4.53. Facilities and Internationality also perform very well, each at 4.47. On the other hand, Accomodation and Value received slightly lower, though still solid, scores of 4.12 and 4.18 respectively. Professors are rated highly at 4.24, rounding out a generally positive assessment.
This university demonstrates notable strengths in its **Location**, receiving a high rating of 4.64. **Student Life** and **Internationality** are also well-regarded. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower score of 2.5. Other aspects like **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Value** fall within a moderate to good range.
The university presents a varied profile, with its strongest aspects being internationality and value, both scoring a solid 4 out of 5. Conversely, facilities, location, student life, and accommodation are rated at a respectable but average 3. The academic environment, indicated by professor ratings, falls slightly above average at 3.75. Overall, the institution excels in global appeal and affordability, while other areas maintain a consistent performance level.
Student feedback indicates strong satisfaction across several aspects of university life. Location stands out as the highest-rated area, with internationality and professors also receiving excellent marks. While student life and value are also highly regarded, facilities represent the weakest area among the surveyed categories. Overall, the institution demonstrates a solid performance with clear strengths in its external and academic offerings.
With a 4.37/5 average from 132 reviews, ~92% are positive, praising the city, campus, academic atmosphere, and career services. Minimal negative feedback (~0.8%) exists, with one student noting a lack of support at the master's level.
~95% of 40 university reviews are positive, praising student support, campus, and opportunities. A small percentage of feedback mentions issues with lecturing and academic support.
The university receives high praise (~79%) for its welcoming atmosphere, hands-on learning, and career support. A small portion of feedback (~5.5%) mentions issues with program structure and job prospects.
Most reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 4.35/5. Students praise academic excellence, real-world application, passionate professors, and well-structured, practical programs. No negative feedback was reported.
Most student feedback is positive (~63% 4-5 stars), highlighting excellent pedagogy, practical experiences, and supportive staff. The average rating is 3.81/5, with no negative reviews.
Most university student reviews (approximately 75%) are positive, highlighting accessible distance learning and program applicability. A smaller portion (about 25%) express frustration with course content and delivery.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~95% of feedback highlighting an engaging, internationally relevant learning experience and a welcoming environment. Students appreciate practical learning, helpful staff, and international class settings. No negative feedback was recorded.
The facilities of the school of computing are great - very modern building, newest equipment, campus located in the city centre (most likely you don’t need to commute there by metro or a bus). One major thing however that is lacking is the organisation. Being a third-year student I still have the same feeling - the program is written very chaotically. In 2019 there was that revolution of the programme (to keep learning the newest technology) to which lectures and demonstrators still feel a bit unadapted. I hope this will get better in the next year or two years. However, after that time, the taught technology may change again (which is good) and it will take another couple of years for the lecturers to be fluent in what they teaching (which is not good).
Nothing to show
Overall, my time at Northumbria was ok. Not great just ok. My time was influenced by the COVID outbreak and so my final year was all online. Through my second and final year there was a lack of support from tutors. Not only that I had extenuating circumstances which were ignored when appealing my final grade.
Reading about the school, I was impressed by the attention they claim to give the students, their ranking amongst top universities and the business school facilitators plus the partnering bodies. I was also intrigued by the data lab and how their research are always towards the betterment of society and humanity. I was not shocked to resume school and see all these, first hand; I am proud to be part of NUBS story! The classrooms are standard and environmentally friendly, the campus is aesthetically beautiful and has a story to tell. The reception is almost like a friendly work station and I love how my desk replicates an office setting making me feel at home and not like a child resuming school. I resumed late and had my supervisors and students helping me catch up with a friendly team that I could reach out to without fear or remorse. It sure is a great place to school and work.
This university has a lot of qualities such as adapting to students in order to optimize learning, and the desire to confront the student as quickly as possible with the world of work. On the other hand, I would criticize this school for poorly disseminated information and a gloomy community life.
I rarely leave reviews, but I felt compelled to share my experience to help others make an informed decision before enrolling in this school. What was promised as a professional, expert-led learning journey turned out to be an extremely frustrating and misleading experience from start to finish. Firstly, the course content itself was a major red flag. It became quickly apparent that the material was not developed or delivered by qualified human experts. The writing style, structure, and overall quality is regurgitate and regenerated AI—often incoherent, repetitive, and lacking the depth and critical insight one would expect from an accredited educational provider. They admitted in writing to me their courses where generated by OpenAI. I could have simply gone on ChatGPT and asked for the course, without paying for it. There was little to no evidence of real academic or industry expertise behind the materials, and attempts to clarify or engage with instructors were met with vague, generic responses that did not address the content or questions raised. Secondly, and more alarmingly, this school advertises affiliations and accreditations with well-known awarding bodies to bolster its credibility. Out of concern, I contacted several of these organisations directly to verify their connection to the school. Every single one I reached out to confirmed that they have no affiliation whatsoever with the institution. This level of misrepresentation is not only unethical but borders on fraudulent, especially for prospective students relying on these claims to make decisions about their education and future. This experience has been both disappointing and infuriating. I invested time, money, and trust into this course, only to discover that it fails to meet even basic standards of legitimacy and academic integrity. To anyone considering enrolling: please do thorough research. Ask for proof of accreditation and human-led instruction. Do not rely solely on what’s displayed on the website or in promotional materials. There are many credible, high-quality educational providers out there—but unfortunately, this is not one of them.
First of all since my campus was in the heart of Rome, the place and inside of the university was like a whole museum. I love how friendly and helpful the staff was, the professors were one in a million. I love how they did all their best to tell us about the subjects in detail and in a fun way with examples for us to get into it more. I liked how they make time and engage in it and actually help us to teach us, so it was all in one reading writing with our own brain and infos searching for the sources by ourselves listening but also being able to express our own way of knowledge on the topics!
