Shahjalal University of Science and Technology - SUST vs London School of Commerce - LSC vs Tashkent University of Information Technologies - TUIT vs Metropolitan University Sylhet vs Sylhet Medical University
Side-by-side comparison from 28 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Positive learning environment and quality education
- +Prestigious reputation and research opportunities
- +Vibrant community and personal development support
- +Accessible resources and supportive faculty
- +Engaging learning environment and quality instruction
- +Opportunities for exposure and growth
Nothing to show
- +Outstanding quality of classes and lectures
- +Helpful courses for long-term goals
- +Supportive teachers and focus-conducive facilities
Nothing to show
- +Supportive staff and excellent instruction
- +Vibrant campus life and diverse clubs
- +Quality academic programs and facilities
- +Real-world application & expert instructors
- +Transformative, beyond traditional learning
- +International cohort diversity
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources for learning.
- -Lack of expert and modern professors with practical teaching methods.
- -Administrative and management issues within the department.
- -Administrative and communication issues cause stress.
- -Lack of support is a recurring problem.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are frequently mentioned.
- -Course content and teaching methods are often seen as insufficient or irrelevant.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources detract from the learning experience.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and unhelpful instructors are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
- -Administrative issues and lack of responsiveness from staff cause frustration.
- -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from current industry needs.
Offering a well-rounded student experience, this institution excels in **Location** and **Student Life**, both receiving a strong 4.57. **Professors** are also highly regarded at 4.36. Areas for potential improvement include **Accomodation** (3.86) and **Internationality** (3.79), which received the lowest scores. **Facilities** (4.14) and **Value** (4.21) fall within the mid-range, indicating solid performance.
This institution shines brightest in its location, receiving a near-perfect score. Student life and internationality are also areas of moderate strength. Conversely, accommodation stands out as a significant weakness, along with the perceived value of the education. Ratings for facilities and professors are average.
Nothing to show
This institution achieves excellent scores in several key areas, notably in student life, location, and professor quality, all rated 4.75. Internationality and value also received strong marks. The weakest area for the university is accommodation, with a rating of 3.33. Facilities are rated a solid 4.
Nothing to show
This institution garners praise for its excellent Professors and desirable Location, both receiving a high 4.8 rating. Facilities and Student Life are also well-regarded, scoring 4.6. While Internationality is rated a respectable 4.2, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area with a score of 3.8. Overall, the university offers strong value, reflected in its 4.6 rating.
This institution demonstrates a strong showing in several key areas. Its location and internationality are particularly well-regarded, both receiving perfect scores. Facilities, professors, and accommodation also score highly, indicating a solid overall experience. However, student life emerges as a significant weakness, with a rating of zero. This suggests a need for considerable improvement in campus engagement and activities for students.
The university is highly rated (4.43/5), with ~93% of reviews being positive, praising its friendly environment, diverse community, and quality education. A small amount of negative feedback (~7%) mentions issues with department facilities and teacher quality.
The university receives predominantly positive feedback (~75%) with students praising supportive instructors and good facilities. A smaller portion of reviews (~25%) notes administrative delays and communication issues.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.25/5, approximately 75% of student feedback is positive. Recurring themes highlight outstanding classes and programs that align with career goals. A small amount of feedback noted slightly longer class times.
Nothing to show
Students praise the welcoming environment, beautiful campus, and excellent instruction. Amenities, clubs, and supportive staff are frequently highlighted. Educational opportunities and programs are also well-regarded. No negative feedback was provided.
With an average rating of 4/5, one review indicates a highly positive student experience. This feedback highlights transformative education, industry expert professors, and practical, strategic learning through real-world scenarios and hands-on projects.
Sylhet's Shahjalal University of Science and Technology (SUST) is a well-known university that has made significant growth. Various academic and extracurricular activities have elevated this university to national and worldwide prominence. Teachers and students participate in a variety of programs to help the institution become a centre of excellence. I got every opportunity to learn a lot as a computer science student.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
