University of the Punjab - PU vs Lahore University of Management Sciences - LUMS vs University College Lahore vs Superior University vs Skans School of Accountancy - Nil

Side-by-side comparison from 130 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Skans School of Accountancy - Nil (4.70)
University of the Punjab - PU: wins 0/4 categories
Lahore University of Management Sciences - LUMS: wins 1/4 categories
University College Lahore: wins 1/4 categories
Superior University: wins 0/4 categories
Skans School of Accountancy - Nil: wins 0/4 categories
CMH Lahore Medical College: wins 2/4 categories
Lahore Leads University: wins 0/4 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
Best programme: Economics
Best programme: Civil Engineering
Lahore, Pakistan
3.90
Read more reviews
8 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer Science
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
Best programme: Physiotherapy
Category ratings
Facilities
4.18
4.44
Win
4.00
4.13
4.00
3.00
3.00
Location
4.66
4.50
3.50
3.38
3.67
5.00
Win
3.00
Professors
4.42
4.00
5.00
4.50
3.67
5.00
4.00
Internationality
3.92
3.60
4.50
Win
3.75
3.33
3.00
1.00
Student life
4.29
4.58
3.50
4.00
3.67
5.00
Win
3.00
Value
4.35
4.17
4.50
4.50
3.67
4.00
4.00
Accommodation
3.92
3.76
4.00
3.63
4.00
3.00
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong academic programs with knowledgeable and supportive faculty
  • +Vibrant campus atmosphere with diverse opportunities and engaging learning environment
  • +Affordable student city with practical experience and career development support
  • +Critical thinking and intellectual freedom
  • +Rigorous academics and competitive environment
  • +Supportive faculty and comprehensive programmes
  • +Quality education and diverse programmes
  • +Supportive environment and extracurriculars
  • +Adequate resources for specific fields
  • +Cooperative and qualified faculty
  • +Career growth focus and practical learning
  • +Positive campus environment
  • +Knowledgeable and passionate instructors
  • +Suitable program recommendations
  • +Professional environment
  • +High affiliation and accreditation
  • +Modern campus and facilities
  • +Qualified and experienced faculty

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues, particularly with the IT and exam branches, are a major source of frustration.
  • -Lack of transparency, merit, and reliance on connections for support are significant concerns.
  • -Outdated facilities and unmotivated staff contribute to a negative learning environment.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a common complaint.
  • -Lack of practical application and relevance in coursework is a concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.
  • -Illiterate, unethical, and unprofessional staff is a significant concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant concern.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations lead to frustration.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Communication breakdowns and lack of support are recurring problems.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Consistently strong performance marks this institution's review, with location achieving the highest rating at 4.66. Professors also received excellent marks at 4.42, followed closely by student life and value. Accommodations presented the lowest score at 3.92, with internationality also falling below the 4.0 threshold, indicating areas for potential improvement within the university's offerings.

With impressive scores in several areas, this institution excels particularly in **Student Life** and **Location**, both receiving marks above 4.5. **Facilities** also score highly. Conversely, **Accomodation** and **Internationality** are the areas needing the most improvement, with ratings of 3.76 and 3.6 respectively. **Professors** and **Value** fall comfortably in the middle range of the provided data.

Performance across various university aspects reveals a strong academic focus, with professors receiving the highest rating of 5. Facilities and accommodation are well-regarded, both scoring 4, complemented by an excellent internationality score of 4.5. Value for money also stands out with a rating of 4.5. The weakest areas, though still respectable, are location and student life, each rated at 3.5.

An analysis of the university's ratings reveals exceptional strengths in **Professors** and **Value**, both scoring a perfect 4.5. **Facilities** and **Student Life** also received commendable scores. Conversely, **Location** emerged as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.375. Other categories like **Accomodation**, **Internationality**, and **Student Life** fall within a moderate to good range, indicating a generally positive student experience with a standout academic and financial offering, offset by the geographical setting.

This university demonstrates notable strengths in its facilities and accommodation, both receiving high marks. Its location, student life, and value for money are also well-regarded, averaging a solid 3.67. The weakest area identified is internationality, which scores slightly lower than other aspects. Overall, the university presents a generally positive profile with specific areas of excellence.

This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in its faculty expertise, campus location, and vibrant student life, all receiving perfect scores. Conversely, areas such as facilities and accommodation are rated moderately, indicating room for improvement. Internationality also sits at a moderate level. Overall, the university offers good value, reflected in its solid four-star rating.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Approximately 71 out of 80 reviews are positive, highlighting strong academics, knowledgeable faculty, and an energetic campus environment. A small percentage of feedback notes issues with university management.

Nearly all (91%) student reviews praise LUMS for its transformative education, critical thinking encouragement, and supportive faculty. Students value the demanding academics and diverse campus community, finding the experience rewarding despite challenges. No negative feedback was recorded.

With an average rating of 4.5/5, the university is highly praised. Reviews highlight quality education, diverse degree options, and various extracurricular activities. Engineering students specifically note adequate lab equipment and qualified faculty.

Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting cooperative, well-qualified teachers, a focus on career growth, and practical learning. One negative review criticized staff qualifications.

With a high average rating of 4.67/5, 100% of feedback is positive. Students praise professors' strong subject knowledge and passion, and appreciate personalized program recommendations that align with budget and facilities.

The single review is highly positive, awarding 4/5 stars. This feedback highlights strong affiliations, modern facilities, and qualified faculty, with no negative points raised.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
63%
57%
50%
38%
67%
0%
0%
4★
26%
31%
50%
38%
33%
100%
0%
3★
9%
11%
0%
13%
0%
0%
100%
2★
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
1%
0%
0%
13%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
About Education system

Im saira students of university of the Punjab i complete my Bs Economics recently i like my university education systems because they give opportunities and chance of needed students of Pakistan and others countries to complete education through funds and scholarships

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

University management and staff

It is very sad to say that one of the best Pakistan institutes of education has such illiterate, unethical and stupid staff in its university. They need to hire qualified staff, so that they can maintain their good standing.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close