Universidad de Nebrija vs Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia - RUDN vs Adelphi University vs University of Algiers 2 - Abou EL Kacem Saâdallah vs Madurai Kamaraj University

Side-by-side comparison from 33 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: CY Tech (5.00)
Universidad de Nebrija: wins 0/6 categories
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia - RUDN: wins 0/6 categories
Adelphi University: wins 0/6 categories
University of Algiers 2 - Abou EL Kacem Saâdallah: wins 0/6 categories
Madurai Kamaraj University: wins 0/6 categories
Sultan Agung Islamic University: wins 0/6 categories
CY Tech: wins 6/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: BA Political Science
Garden City, New York, United States
3.80
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Health Science
Best programme: English and American Studies
Best programme: Computer Application
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Cergy, France
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Civil Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
3.80
4.00
2.83
3.60
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.13
4.20
4.25
2.67
4.20
Not rated
5.00
Win
Professors
4.22
3.80
3.75
4.17
4.20
Not rated
5.00
Win
Internationality
4.00
4.20
3.50
3.33
3.60
Not rated
5.00
Win
Student life
4.13
4.50
3.50
2.83
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Value
4.00
4.00
4.00
3.50
4.20
Not rated
5.00
Win
Accommodation
3.75
3.20
4.00
2.50
3.40
Not rated
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive and competent faculty
  • +Strong sense of community and personalized interactions
  • +Modern, innovative teaching and facilities
  • +Engaging academics, practical skill development, and career support
  • +Vibrant, multicultural atmosphere with global connections and cultural exchange
  • +Diverse program options and research opportunities
  • +Diverse and inclusive community
  • +Strong academic programs and professors
  • +Social events and activities
  • +Diverse and comprehensive academic programs
  • +Supportive and involved faculty
  • +Rich cultural and historical campus environment
  • +High-quality, knowledgeable, and experienced faculty.
  • +Comprehensive curriculum with theoretical and practical learning.
  • +Engaging campus life and active student community.

Nothing to show

  • +Accessible international policies
  • +Focus on scientific research development
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues, particularly regarding student support and program flexibility.
  • -Outdated teaching methodologies and a lack of practical, relevant opportunities for all students.
  • -Unexpected and costly requirements for in-person testing despite online instruction.
  • -Administrative and management issues, including allegations of corruption and biased treatment.
  • -Administrative and management issues create service inaccessibility and cause significant academic disruption.
  • -Lack of support for students and alumni is a consistent problem.
  • -Poor communication between students and administration.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations create confusion.

Nothing to show

  • -Lack of clear communication and organization from staff.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and lack of engagement.
Rating summary
What students say

Overall, the university garners strong ratings, with professors and student life standing out as particular strengths at 4.22 and 4.125 respectively. Facilities and internationality also received excellent marks of 4. The weakest area, while still respectable, is accommodation at 3.75, suggesting room for improvement in student housing options. Value and location are also rated positively.

This institution demonstrates a robust student life, scoring a 4.5, and excellent internationality and location at 4.2. However, accommodation presents the lowest score at 3.2, with facilities and professors also receiving moderate ratings of 3.8. Value is rated a solid 4.0, suggesting a generally positive experience balanced by some areas for improvement.

This institution garners high marks in several key areas, with location and accommodation particularly standing out with ratings of 4.25 and 4 respectively. Facilities also received a solid 4. The university's weakest points, however, lie in student life and internationality, both rated at 3.5. Professors are moderately well-regarded at 3.75, and the overall value is considered good at 4.

This institution performs strongest in its academic offerings and international appeal. Professors receive an impressive average rating of 4.17, and the university also scores well for its internationality (3.33) and value (3.5). Conversely, areas such as accommodation and location present opportunities for improvement, with ratings of 2.5 and 2.67 respectively. Facilities and student life are rated moderately, around 2.83.

Performance across various aspects of university life shows a generally positive trend. The institution excels notably in **Professors**, **Location**, and **Value**, all receiving 4.2. Student life is also well-regarded at 4.0. Areas for potential improvement include **Facilities** and **Internationality**, both scoring 3.6, and **Accomodation** which is rated at 3.4.

Nothing to show

This institution excels in several key areas, with professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value all receiving perfect scores. Conversely, facilities appear to be a significant area for improvement, indicated by a rating of zero. The university presents a highly positive experience for its students in most aspects.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Most student reviews are positive (~78%), praising competent professors, a welcoming atmosphere, and modern facilities. Some feedback notes a high workload and occasional issues with internship opportunities or program delivery.

With a 4/5 average rating from 8 reviews, ~75% are positive. Students praise academic exploration, diverse cultures, and career preparation. A small portion (~12.5%) mention administrative delays and corruption allegations.

Approximately 75% of reviews are positive, highlighting academic programs, diversity, and community. A smaller portion of feedback, about 25%, expresses dissatisfaction with university administration and support services.

With an average rating of 3.5/5, ~74% of university student reviews are positive, highlighting diverse programs, engaged faculty, and unique campus environments. A small amount of negative feedback, ~17%, notes communication gaps.

Students praise knowledgeable and supportive faculty, an updated curriculum, and active campus life. This positive sentiment (~100%) is reflected in the high average rating of 4.2/5.

Nothing to show

This university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with a perfect 5/5 average rating. One review highlights its strong international policy and emphasis on scientific research development.

Rating distribution
5★
67%
50%
50%
0%
20%
0%
100%
4★
11%
25%
25%
67%
80%
0%
0%
3★
0%
13%
0%
17%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
17%
0%
0%
0%
1★
22%
13%
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia

RUDN provides a vibrant, multicultural atmosphere ideal for students seeking global connections. However, administrative processes (visa support, registration) can be slow and bureaucratic. The language programs ( Russian/English-taught courses) are excellent for non-native speakers. Campus facilities like libraries and dormitories are decent, though some buildings need renovation. Student clubs and events foster cultural exchange.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close