Kühne Logistics University - KLU vs Hoa Sen University vs Van Lang University - VLU vs Saigon Business School vs Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology - VNU-HCM

Side-by-side comparison from 27 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Kühne Logistics University - KLU: wins 0/4 categories
Hoa Sen University: wins 0/4 categories
Van Lang University - VLU: wins 0/4 categories
Saigon Business School: wins 0/4 categories
Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology - VNU-HCM: wins 4/4 categories
NTT Institute of International Education - NIIE: wins 0/4 categories
Ho Chi Minh City University of Foreign Languages Information Technology - HUFLIT: wins 0/4 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Global Logistics and Supply Chain Management
Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Science
Category ratings
Facilities
4.60
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.00
Location
4.89
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Professors
4.65
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Internationality
4.80
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.00
Student life
4.60
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Value
4.55
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.00
Accommodation
3.25
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive people and approachable professors
  • +Practical, real-world learning experiences
  • +Strong networking and international community

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Job security and promising future
  • +Diverse program offerings
  • +High-quality professors

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive and enthusiastic faculty
  • +Well-organized and relevant study programs
  • +Opportunities for holistic development through extracurriculars
Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently criticized.
  • -Administrative issues, including poor communication and disorganized processes, are a major source of frustration.
  • -Lack of practical application and relevance in the curriculum disappoints students.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are often criticized.
  • -A perceived lack of academic support or engaging teaching methods is noted.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support are common complaints.
Rating summary
What students say

Examining the provided ratings reveals a university excelling in several key aspects. Its location stands out with an impressive score of 4.89, closely followed by strong performance in internationality (4.8), facilities (4.6), student life (4.6), and professors (4.65). However, accommodation presents a clear area for improvement, scoring significantly lower at 3.25, while value remains solid at 4.55.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Consistently outstanding scores mark this institution's performance. All surveyed areas received a perfect 5 out of 5, indicating exceptional strengths. There are no weakest areas identified; the university demonstrates excellence across facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value. This suggests a uniformly strong offering for students.

Nothing to show

This institution excels in key areas, with professors, student life, and location receiving perfect scores. Internationality also stands out with a strong 4. Conversely, facilities and accommodation are noted as areas for potential improvement, both scoring a moderate 3. Overall, the university presents a compelling offering, particularly for those prioritizing an engaging student experience and expert faculty.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.76/5, ~100% of reviews are positive. Students highlight supportive professors, a personal learning environment with small classes, and practical, real-world experiences. No negative feedback was recorded.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university is highly praised. Students highlight job security after graduation, diverse majors, and quality professors. No negative feedback was received.

Nothing to show

With a perfect 5/5 average rating and 100% positive feedback, students praise enthusiastic faculty and well-organized programs. Extracurricular activities are also highlighted as beneficial for skill development.

Rating distribution
5★
80%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
100%
4★
16%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Second Chance

My experience at KLU has truly been life-changing. This university has given me a second chance and opened the door to a completely new life filled with opportunities. From the very beginning, it has felt like a second home. What makes KLU so special is the people. Every single person here is supportive and genuinely willing to help. The professors are not only highly qualified and professional, but also approachable and always ready to guide you in any academic or professional matter. I have never been in a place like this before. The strong connection with industry, the quality of events, and the incredible network of classmates and alumni create the perfect environment for both personal and professional growth. I will always be grateful to KLU for everything I have experienced here.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close