INESDI Digital Business School - Barcelona vs Lesya Ukrainka East European National University vs International Business Information Academy - IPIA vs University of East Sarajevo vs Newton University
Side-by-side comparison from 96 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Knowledgeable and experienced professors with industry practice
- +Practical and hands-on learning approach
- +Personalized student attention and career development support
- +Highly skilled and professional faculty.
- +Abundant opportunities for research and language practice.
- +Engaging extracurricular activities and events.
- +Quality education with supportive staff and professors
- +Modern and well-equipped facilities and classrooms
- +Strong international cooperation and study abroad opportunities
- +Entrepreneurial-minded teachers and practical work
- +Active student organizations supporting professional and student life
- +Practical, modern, and engaging teaching with real-world expertise
- +Supportive, approachable, and friendly professors
- +Flexible learning options and a strong sense of community
- +Hands-on, practical learning and real-world application
- +Supportive and approachable professors and environment
- +Well-structured programs and convenient accessibility
Nothing to show
- -administrative & management issues
- -poor communication and transparency
- -difficulties with financial processes
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and lack of support.
- -Outdated and inadequate facilities, with complaints about cleanliness and functionality.
- -Overpriced tuition relative to the quality of education and resources provided.
- -Administrative and management issues create confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources hinder learning.
- -The curriculum feels irrelevant, lacking practical application and depth.
- -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of essential resources are a recurring problem.
- -Poor communication and lack of transparency from staff are major drawbacks.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Course content is often irrelevant or not updated.
- -Poor teaching quality and insufficient course content for job readiness.
- -Inadequate support and resources from college administration.
- -Uninspiring and outdated learning facilities.
Nothing to show
Examining the provided ratings reveals a mixed picture. This institution excels in areas such as **professors**, achieving a strong 4 out of 5. It also demonstrates good standing in **internationality** and **value**, both scoring 3. Conversely, significant weaknesses are apparent with zero ratings for **facilities**, **location**, and **accommodation**. **Student life** received a low score of 1.
This institution excels in accommodations and value, both receiving perfect scores. Its facilities, professors, student life, and internationality are also highly regarded, each earning a 4-star rating. The university's weakest area, however, is its location, which received a score of 0, indicating a significant drawback in this aspect.
This institution demonstrates outstanding performance, achieving a perfect score in Professors, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value. Its strongest areas are clearly these aspects, reflecting a highly positive student experience and excellent offerings. The Facilities rating, while still very good at 4, represents the only slight area for potential improvement within an otherwise exceptional overall assessment.
This institution's ratings reveal a mixed picture. Professors and student life stand out as strengths, both scoring well. Conversely, location and internationality are areas where improvement could be considered. Facilities and accommodation also received moderate scores. The university offers a good overall value.
This institution garners impressive scores across multiple aspects, with its **Facilities** and **Professors** standing out as exceptional strengths. **Internationality** also received a very positive evaluation. Conversely, **Accommodations** emerged as the weakest area, indicating potential room for improvement. The university also performed well in **Location** and **Value**, with **Student Life** being a solid, though not outstanding, component.
Across various metrics, this institution demonstrates a strong standing. Internationality stands out as the highest-rated aspect, reflecting a globally connected environment. Facilities and location also score very well. While Professor quality is slightly lower than other areas, it still represents a solid rating. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded and appealing profile to students.
Nothing to show
Reviews are predominantly positive (~75%), with students highlighting knowledgeable professors and a practical, in-depth curriculum. A smaller portion (~25%) reported issues with administrative processes.
All 5 reviews are positive, averaging 4/5 stars. Students praise skilled teachers and research opportunities, especially within the English and French Philology department. Minor points include improving heating and reducing photocopy costs.
The sole review is highly positive, awarding 5 out of 5 stars. Students praise the quality education, supportive professors, and modern, well-equipped facilities. No negative feedback was recorded.
With an average rating of 3.8/5, roughly 60% of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent international cooperation and strong entrepreneurial thinking among teachers. No negative feedback was recorded.
All eight reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students praise the practical, modern teaching, approachable and skilled professors, and a friendly, community atmosphere.
Around 98.6% of reviews are positive, highlighting hands-on experience, supportive professors, and practical skills gained. A very small percentage of feedback mentioned insufficient teaching.
Nothing to show
My experience with Inesdi, a business school in Barcelona, was deeply discouraging. After requesting a refund of 200 euros for an unused service, I found myself trapped in a cycle of procrastination and evasion by the admissions manager. What should have been a simple process turned into an ordeal lasting almost three months, with no guarantee of receiving my money back. The lack of transparency and professionalism on the part of Inesdi is worrying. Instead of addressing my request promptly, they seemed more interested in prolonging the process, apparently to avoid fulfilling their obligation to refund the money. After weeks of frustration and multiple contact attempts, I was abruptly informed that my application was no longer eligible, with no clear explanation. In short, my experience with Inesdi was a total disappointment. Your lack of integrity and respect for clients demonstrates a lack of commitment to basic ethical standards. I recommend those considering enrolling at Inesdi to think twice, as it seems that their priority is not providing quality education or satisfactory customer service, but simply money.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The faculty and university need greater modernization in the form of technological resources, as well as in the field of educating the teachers themselves to be more accessible to the students themselves, because most of them are old and still hold standard lectures.
This university is perfect for someone who wants to work with school, some classes are online which means you can watch them whenever you have time. This uni teachers highly practical stuff, and people there are higly skilled and I would say more friendly than on other schools, you can talk to them like human beings and they will talk back as they talk with their collegues
Studying Computer programming at seneca college was quite a challenge for me. I am a post covid pass out from Seneca College. My first the semesters were mostly spent online and the last was majorly in person. Both online and in-person classes we were not given a proper teaching. Most of the professors gave a very brief teaching of the course which is definitely not enough for jobs in the field. Most of the learnings I got was from youtube or some online courses. I am not too sure if the condition is same after the covid batches but I wont recommend this program at Seneca.
Nothing to show