INESDI Digital Business School - Barcelona vs East Stroudsburg University vs The City College of New York- CCNY vs Arizona Western College - AWC vs University of Doha for Science and Technology
Side-by-side comparison from 18 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Knowledgeable and experienced professors with industry practice
- +Practical and hands-on learning approach
- +Personalized student attention and career development support
- +Diverse academic programs and specialized concentrations.
- +Welcoming faculty and abundant student activities.
- +Strong emphasis on inclusivity and community building.
- +Supportive faculty and engaging classes
- +Beautiful campus and accessible financial aid
- +Personalized academic support through programs like SEEK
Nothing to show
- +Safe, comfortable, and well-connected environment
- +Excellent facilities and accommodation
- +Ideal location with convenient access to lectures
- +High-quality education and supportive learning environment
- +Personal and intellectual growth opportunities
- +Peaceful campus atmosphere
- +Engaging and nurturing academic environment
- +High standards and quality of lecturers
- +Development of practical and innovative skills
- -administrative & management issues
- -poor communication and transparency
- -difficulties with financial processes
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of engagement and relevance in coursework is a common complaint.
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Lacking and outdated facilities.
- -Trainer knowledge not meeting expectations.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
- -Lack of support and resources hinders learning.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Limited resources and unclear communication create challenges.
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and slow responses.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources.
- -Inconsistent or ineffective teaching quality and curriculum.
Examining the provided ratings reveals a mixed picture. This institution excels in areas such as **professors**, achieving a strong 4 out of 5. It also demonstrates good standing in **internationality** and **value**, both scoring 3. Conversely, significant weaknesses are apparent with zero ratings for **facilities**, **location**, and **accommodation**. **Student life** received a low score of 1.
With consistently high marks, this institution excels particularly in its **professors and location**, both receiving perfect scores. Student life, accommodation, and internationality are also very strong. The facilities and overall value are rated well, though they represent the relatively weaker aspects compared to other exceptional areas.
This institution demonstrates particular strengths in student life, earning a high rating in this area. Conversely, accommodation received the lowest score among the surveyed categories. Other aspects like facilities, location, and internationality are rated moderately well, while professor quality and value are also mid-range.
Nothing to show
Exceptional scores were awarded across all evaluated aspects, indicating a consistently high-quality experience. The university achieved perfect marks in **Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value**. There are no discernable weakest areas, as every category received the maximum rating, suggesting a comprehensive and outstanding offering to its students.
Overall, the university garners excellent reviews, with standout scores of 5 in Professors, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, and Value. Facilities also score very well at 4.5. The weakest area identified is Internationality, receiving a 3.5 rating.
Overall, the university garners impressive scores, particularly excelling in **Location** (4.5) and **Value** (4.6), indicating significant strengths in these areas. **Student Life** also receives a solid rating of 4.0. Conversely, **Facilities** (3.2) and **Accomodation** (3.4) represent the weakest areas according to the provided ratings.
Reviews are predominantly positive (~75%), with students highlighting knowledgeable professors and a practical, in-depth curriculum. A smaller portion (~25%) reported issues with administrative processes.
Both reviews were positive, giving an average of 4/5 stars. Students highlighted cultural diversity, clubs, activities, and friendly faculty. One review also mentioned the biology program's variety of courses.
Half of reviews are negative, citing lacking facilities and poor administration. Positive feedback highlights attentive professors, engaging classes, and financial aid.
Nothing to show
This single review is overwhelmingly positive, rating the university 5/5. The feedback highlights safety, comfort, excellent facilities, and convenient location as key strengths.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, 100% of feedback is positive. Students praise quality education, a peaceful environment, intellectual growth, and supportive settings. Minor dislikes included heavy workloads and limited resources.
Students overwhelmingly praise Modibbo Adama University, with ~100% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.4/5. Recurring themes highlight a well-organized, nurturing learning environment and valuable academic and character development.
My experience with Inesdi, a business school in Barcelona, was deeply discouraging. After requesting a refund of 200 euros for an unused service, I found myself trapped in a cycle of procrastination and evasion by the admissions manager. What should have been a simple process turned into an ordeal lasting almost three months, with no guarantee of receiving my money back. The lack of transparency and professionalism on the part of Inesdi is worrying. Instead of addressing my request promptly, they seemed more interested in prolonging the process, apparently to avoid fulfilling their obligation to refund the money. After weeks of frustration and multiple contact attempts, I was abruptly informed that my application was no longer eligible, with no clear explanation. In short, my experience with Inesdi was a total disappointment. Your lack of integrity and respect for clients demonstrates a lack of commitment to basic ethical standards. I recommend those considering enrolling at Inesdi to think twice, as it seems that their priority is not providing quality education or satisfactory customer service, but simply money.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show