HAN University of Applied Sciences vs Tinbergen Institute vs College of Estate Management vs Ohio Wesleyan University - OWU vs The University of Hagen - FU Hagen

Side-by-side comparison from 45 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Ohio Wesleyan University - OWU (5.00)
HAN University of Applied Sciences: wins 1/6 categories
Tinbergen Institute: wins 0/6 categories
College of Estate Management: wins 0/6 categories
Ohio Wesleyan University - OWU: wins 1/6 categories
The University of Hagen - FU Hagen: wins 0/6 categories
Zetech University: wins 2/6 categories
Holy Family University: wins 2/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Communication
Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Reading, The United Kingdom
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Delaware, Ohio, United States
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Zoology
Best programme: Media
Best programme: Information Technology
Philadelphia, United States
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Psychology
Category ratings
Facilities
4.29
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
4.58
4.00
Location
3.86
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
4.00
4.52
Win
4.00
Professors
4.43
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
4.00
4.38
5.00
Internationality
4.14
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
3.00
4.12
3.00
Student life
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
2.00
4.41
Win
4.00
Value
4.29
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
4.00
4.38
5.00
Win
Accommodation
3.86
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
4.06
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical, industry-relevant learning with engaged, experienced staff.
  • +Excellent facilities and a supportive, high-quality educational environment.
  • +Balanced student life opportunities with an international atmosphere.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive and mentor-like faculty relationships
  • +Emphasis on student learning and personal growth
  • +Structured and easy-to-follow materials
  • +Facilitates self-paced learning
  • +Supportive and professional faculty
  • +Practical, job-market relevant education
  • +Dynamic and enriching learning environment
  • +Welcoming and supportive atmosphere
  • +Clean and beautiful campus environment
  • +Caring and helpful professors
Cons
  • -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities are a recurring complaint.
  • -Unresponsive or unhelpful staff contribute to dissatisfaction.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Course content and delivery are uninspired and irrelevant.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a consistent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources negatively impact the learning environment.
  • -Communication breakdowns and unresponsiveness from staff are common complaints.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities are a recurring complaint.
  • -There are consistent issues with administrative support and course management.
  • -Students find the curriculum and teaching methods to be unengaging and outdated.
  • -Poor communication and lack of transparency from administration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
  • -Ineffective teaching methods and curriculum.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **professors**, receiving a high rating of 4.43. Facilities and value are also highly regarded, both scoring 4.29. Conversely, the university's **location** and **accommodation** received the lowest marks at 3.86, suggesting these areas may warrant further attention for improvement. Student life and internationality are rated moderately well, with scores of 4.00 and 4.14 respectively.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution excels in several key areas, achieving perfect scores for **Facilities** and **Professors**. **Student Life** and **Accomodation** are also rated positively, indicating a good overall experience. However, **Location** and **Internationality** received moderate ratings, suggesting these might be areas for potential improvement or consideration. The university offers good **Value** for its students.

This university presents a largely positive picture, with impressive scores for facilities, professors, location, and overall value, all rated a strong 4 out of 5. Internationality also scores moderately well at 3. However, student life is a significant weakness, receiving a low rating of 2. Accommodation is notably absent from positive feedback, scoring a 0, indicating a critical area for improvement.

The institution garners exceptional praise for its **Facilities**, achieving a near-perfect score. **Location** and **Student Life** also stand out as significant strengths. Conversely, **Accomodation** receives the lowest rating among the assessed areas. **Professors**, **Internationality**, and **Value** are all rated positively, indicating a generally well-regarded university experience.

This institution garners exceptional marks for its professors and accommodation, both receiving perfect scores. Facilities, location, and student life are also highly rated at a solid four. Its weakest area is internationality, scoring a three. Overall, the university offers strong value, reflected in its perfect score in that category.

Reviews summary
Highlights

University feedback is overwhelmingly positive, with ~88% of reviews rating it 4-5 stars and an average of 4.25/5. Recurring themes include excellent facilities, supportive staff, and effective practical teaching. Minimal negative feedback was noted.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university boasts universally positive feedback. Students highlight exceptional faculty, noting their engagement, mentorship, and focus on student learning and interpersonal relationships.

The single review is overwhelmingly positive, with ~100% of feedback being favorable and an average rating of 4/5. The reviewer highlights excellent course structure and clear learning materials. No negative feedback was provided.

~91% of reviews are positive, praising the institution for its professional lecturers, great learning experience, and modern facilities. A small amount of feedback mentions slow administration processes.

With a 4/5 average rating, feedback highlights a welcoming atmosphere and supportive professors. Most students found the campus beautiful and well-maintained. Limited parking was a minor concern, but the free parking offset this.

Rating distribution
5★
38%
0%
0%
100%
0%
47%
0%
4★
50%
0%
0%
0%
100%
44%
100%
3★
13%
0%
0%
0%
0%
9%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
The content that is being provided within the course

The lesson materials we are receiving are quite interesting in regards to the course. We are learning about global issues and how to handle encountering different cultures as international social workers.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Great learning experience

I am having a great experience studying at Zetech University. The lecturers are always available to support students and ensure they are equiped with necessary skills to tackle real world challenges. The campus has modern facilities, including a well-equipped library and great study spaces. However, I feel that the administration could improve response times when handling student concerns. More career counseling and mental well-being services would also be helpful. Overall, I highly recommend this university to anyone looking for a quality education in a supportive and friendly environment.

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close