Linnaeus University - LNU vs Seton Hall University - SHU vs Taif University vs American University of Kuwait vs Vita-Salute San Raffaele University - UniSR
Side-by-side comparison from 35 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive and helpful professors and staff.
- +Good facilities and diverse academic programs.
- +Welcoming international environment and convenient resources.
- +Relevant specialization and career enhancement
- +Strong academic programs and specialized concentrations
- +High-quality education complementing prior experience
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Integrated academic, clinical, and research environment
- +High-quality teaching and knowledgeable, available instructors
- +Excellent preparation, rich internships, and modern facilities
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues, particularly concerning international student affairs.
- -Mediocre teaching quality with limited value beyond independent learning.
- -Lack of industry connections and career support.
- -Inefficient administrative processes and poor management.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Lack of engaging teaching and relevant curriculum.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and transparency leads to confusion.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Academic and student life aspects of the university received high marks. The institution particularly excelled in Internationality (4.27) and Student Life (4.23), reflecting a vibrant and globally-connected campus environment. Facilities (4.16) and Professors (4.12) also garnered positive feedback. Conversely, Value (3.81) and Location (3.83) were the lowest-rated categories, suggesting areas for potential improvement. Accommodations also scored moderately (3.92).
This institution excels in several key areas, notably achieving perfect scores for its professors, location, and international student experience. Value for money is also rated highly. However, the university struggles significantly in student life and accommodation, both receiving zero marks. Facilities are rated well, but not outstanding.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution receives outstanding marks, particularly for its **professors** and **value**, which are rated exceptionally high. The **facilities** and **student life** are also strong points. While **accommodation** and **location** are rated slightly lower, they remain positive. The university demonstrates good **internationality**, contributing to a well-rounded experience.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
About 80% of reviews are positive, highlighting supportive professors, a welcoming atmosphere, and good facilities. A small portion (~7%) of negative feedback points to issues with teaching quality and administrative support.
The single review is highly positive, with a 5/5 average rating. This ~100% positive feedback highlights satisfaction with the program, particularly its compliment to an accounting background and perceived value as a career supplement.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (100%), with an average rating of 4.86/5. Students frequently highlight the strong integration of campus, hospital, and research, along with high-quality teaching and valuable internship opportunities.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Rating: ★★☆☆☆ (2/5 — one extra star because tuition was free) I studied Software Technology at Linnaeus University between 2022 and 2025. In my experience, the quality of teaching was mediocre. I quickly stopped attending lectures because most added little beyond what I could learn independently. Industry connections were almost nonexistent: no internship support, no company-led workshops, no hackathons, and no clear pathways into the tech sector. The only recurring event was the annual job fair, but many representatives seemed unsure what they were seeking; most offered no internships or projects and there was rarely any follow-up, so it felt more promotional than student-focused. Entrepreneurship support was minimal. When we started a student project, there was no funding, no events, no network, and very limited guidance — essentially just one counsellor providing basic advice. Faculty culture felt very political and unresponsive to student feedback. When issues were raised formally, they were often dismissed, though quiet changes were occasionally made later. I personally experienced hostile and dismissive behaviour from a lecturer in the tech faculty, which I reported to the Student Union in 2024 along with other classmates. The case was closed in the lecturer’s favour, yet the university quietly implemented some of the changes we had requested. The complaint process left me uncertain about its independence, and I believe there’s a need for more transparent procedures and external oversight. On the positive side, there are a few excellent professors who genuinely care about their students and involve them in research, but they are a small minority and you have to actively seek them out. Overall, I’m deeply disappointed with the university’s approach to education and student development. I feel I wasted three years of potential growth and opportunity here. Prospective students should do thorough research and speak directly with current students before enrolling.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I completed both my Bachelor’s (Triennale) and Master’s (Magistrale) degrees in Biotechnology. Being in a small class was really helpful. It made communication between students and professors much easier. Also, the program offers a one-year internship packed with opportunities! .
Nothing to show
Nothing to show