University Politehnica of Bucharest - UPB vs Dimitrie Cantemir Christian University - UCDC vs Technical University of Civil Engineering Bucharest vs Romanian-American School Of Business - ASEBUSS vs University of Agronomical Sciences and Veterinary Medicine - USAMV
Side-by-side comparison from 72 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Abundant opportunities for professional and personal development.
- +Supportive and approachable professors who facilitate learning.
- +Strong engineering programs with industry interest.
- +Practical and useful programs
- +Modern and clean facilities
- +Experienced and supportive teachers
- +Strong engineering programs and knowledgeable teachers
- +Accessible location and good transportation links
- +Ample facilities available
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of student care are prevalent.
- -Outdated facilities and infrastructure are a significant problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Inconsistent communication and unclear expectations lead to confusion.
- -administrative and management issues
- -outdated facilities and poor maintenance
- -lack of resources and support
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Location**, scoring a high 4.2, and in **Student Life**, with a rating of 3.94. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the weakest area, receiving a score of 3.15. Other aspects like Professors, Internationality, and Value fall within a solid mid-range, indicating a generally positive but not exceptional performance in these categories.
This institution receives uniformly excellent ratings, with perfect scores across all surveyed aspects. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value are all rated a perfect 5. Consequently, there are no distinct strongest or weakest areas, as all aspects are performing at the highest possible level.
Exceptional strengths are evident in student life, professor quality, and accommodation, all receiving near-perfect scores. The university also scores very well in internationality and value. However, facilities represent a notable area for improvement, with a considerably lower rating compared to other aspects.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting ample opportunities and supportive professors. A small fraction of negative feedback (~6%) points to system issues and inconsistent educational standards.
Reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~100% of feedback being 4-5 stars. Students highlight a great, modern, and clean environment with experienced teachers and useful, practical programs.
With a 4/5 average rating, the single review highlights a positive engineering program and atmosphere. Minor feedback mentioned outdated machinery. Approximately 100% of feedback is positive.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
My first year was excellent there, there are a lot of friends you can make and the professors really do help us. I remember going to class and joking about random things with them. The exams are pretty simple because you learn from the class, you don't need pretty much anything when you have people like these around you.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
