IBA International Business Academy - IBA vs London School of Commerce - LSC vs École Nationale Supérieure d'Agronomie et des Industries Alimentaire - ENSAIA vs Cross River University of Technology - Crutech vs Ayrshire College

Side-by-side comparison from 75 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
IBA International Business Academy - IBA: wins 0/6 categories
London School of Commerce - LSC: wins 1/6 categories
École Nationale Supérieure d'Agronomie et des Industries Alimentaire - ENSAIA: wins 3/6 categories
Cross River University of Technology - Crutech: wins 2/6 categories
Ayrshire College: wins 0/6 categories
ICOT College: wins 0/6 categories
NPI University of Bangladesh: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
London, The United Kingdom
3.80
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Administration
Best programme: Computer Science
Ayr, The United Kingdom
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Dublin, Ireland
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
manikganj, Bangladesh
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
3.50
3.25
3.00
3.69
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Location
3.00
4.75
Win
3.00
3.73
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.00
3.25
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
3.00
3.50
3.00
3.62
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
2.00
3.75
4.00
Win
3.75
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Value
3.00
2.75
4.00
Win
3.92
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
2.00
2.00
5.00
Win
3.72
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical, skill-building curriculum with real-world application
  • +Global, diverse student community and networking opportunities
  • +Engaging historical city location with ongoing university improvements
  • +Accessible resources and supportive faculty
  • +Engaging learning environment and quality instruction
  • +Opportunities for exposure and growth
  • +Clear program specialization after common core
  • +Focused agricultural and food industry engineering education
  • +Academic excellence and strong research emphasis
  • +Focus on innovation and practical skills
  • +Entrepreneurship and shaping students for the secular world

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and communication issues cause stress.
  • -Lack of support is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of transparency are prevalent concerns.
  • -Inadequate security and frequent attacks by external groups.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Analyzing the provided ratings, the university excels in its **professors**, receiving a strong score of 4. Conversely, **student life** and **accommodation** present the most significant areas for improvement, both scoring a low 2. Facilities and internationality are rated moderately at 3 and 3.5 respectively, while location and value land at a respectable 3.

This institution shines brightest in its location, receiving a near-perfect score. Student life and internationality are also areas of moderate strength. Conversely, accommodation stands out as a significant weakness, along with the perceived value of the education. Ratings for facilities and professors are average.

With excellent ratings in accommodation and strong showings in professors and student life, this institution presents a positive picture. Its weakest areas appear to be in facilities and internationality, both receiving moderate scores. The overall value is well-regarded, suggesting a solid educational investment despite some room for improvement in physical resources and global engagement.

This university garners a strong overall impression, with particular praise for its Professors, who received a perfect score. Value for money also ranks highly. Conversely, Internationality received the lowest rating among the surveyed categories. Facilities, Location, Student Life, and Accomodation all achieved solid mid-range scores, indicating a generally positive student experience.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 3.75/5, the university receives mostly positive feedback. Students highlight practical learning, skill development, and international exposure as key strengths, with approximately 0% expressing negative sentiment.

The university receives predominantly positive feedback (~75%) with students praising supportive instructors and good facilities. A smaller portion of reviews (~25%) notes administrative delays and communication issues.

This university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~100% of reviews being favorable. Students appreciate the clear specialization options in agronomy and agrifood, allowing informed career choices.

~83% of reviews are positive, highlighting academic excellence, well-equipped facilities, and practical skill development. Just ~1.5% express concerns about school security.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
25%
50%
0%
20%
0%
0%
0%
4★
25%
25%
100%
64%
0%
0%
0%
3★
50%
0%
0%
15%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
25%
0%
2%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Teaching

This university has high standard lecturers/professors who have passion in teaching. They teach and carry all students along irrespective of your capacity or zeal in studies. I would like to recommend this school to students who want to come out doing well in life and feeling proud about their school.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close