Escuela de Diseño CEI - CEI vs Bethnal Student Academy vs Central College Nottingham vs Sustainability Management School - SUMAS vs Western Nevada College - WNC
Side-by-side comparison from 12 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent and knowledgeable teachers
- +High-quality training and programs
- +Effective virtual learning environment
Nothing to show
- +Career-relevant, helpful courses
- +Supportive, knowledgeable staff
- +Engaging and knowledgeable instructors
- +Relevant and practical course content
- +Supportive and collaborative learning environment
Nothing to show
- +Great faculty and beautiful location
- +Excellent student accommodation options
- +Affordable quality education with practical, up-to-date curriculum
- +Knowledgeable and helpful faculty with a supportive learning environment
- +Balanced theory and hands-on projects for reinforced learning
- -Administrative and management issues make the student experience frustrating.
- -Course content does not align with advertised practical applications.
- -A decline in staff cordiality and support after enrollment occurs.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources negatively impact the learning experience.
- -Ineffective teaching methods and unsupportive instructors are commonly cited.
- -Administrative and management issues are prevalent.
- -Lack of transparency in grading and unresponsiveness to student concerns.
- -The school's accreditation and recognition are questionable.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant concern.
- -Outdated facilities and poor course quality are frequently criticized.
- -Lack of transparency and unfair practices are also major drawbacks.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Course content is irrelevant and teaching quality is poor.
Overall, this university garners overwhelmingly positive feedback. It excels in providing outstanding accommodation and a prime location, both receiving perfect scores. Student life and professor quality are also highly lauded. The weakest area, while still strong, is internationality, though it remains a positive aspect. Value for money is rated exceptionally highly, as are facilities.
Nothing to show
This institution excels notably in its professors and perceived value, receiving a strong 4 out of 5 in both areas. Conversely, facilities, location, student life, and accommodation all received the lowest possible rating of 1, indicating significant weaknesses. Internationality scored a middling 2. Overall, the university's academic strengths are contrasted by considerable shortcomings in its physical environment and student experience.
Overall, the university presents a mixed performance across various aspects. The strongest areas are the professors and internationality, both receiving a solid 3.33 rating. In contrast, student life and accommodation are the weakest points, scoring a low 1. However, facilities and value also lag behind with scores of 1.33, while location sits at a moderate 2.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates a mixed performance across key evaluation metrics. Its strongest suit lies in its location, receiving a high rating of 4. Conversely, the university's weakest areas are its professors and value for money, both scoring a lower 2.5. Other aspects like facilities, student life, accommodation, and internationality are rated a moderate 3.
Receiving top marks across the board, this institution demonstrates an exceptionally strong offering. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value are all rated a perfect five. With no discernible weaker areas, the university presents a consistently outstanding experience for its students in every surveyed aspect.
Feedback is split, with ~50% of reviews being negative. Positive feedback highlights excellent teachers and good training, while negative reviews cite disappointing practical application and unhelpful management after payment.
Nothing to show
With one review, this university boasts an average rating of 4/5 stars. The feedback highlights a knowledgeable and helpful course, recommending it for career advancement, despite noting an inconvenient location.
All three reviews are negative (100%), with an average rating of 1/5. Recurring themes include unrecognized degrees, poor administration with unresponsiveness and lack of transparency in grading, and disorganized, unprofessional management.
Nothing to show
With a 2.5/5 average rating, reviews are split evenly between positive and negative feedback. Positive comments highlight a good faculty and campus, while negative feedback points to management issues and withheld information.
With an average rating of 5/5 from 2 reviews, sentiment is 100% positive. Students praise the balance of affordability and quality education, a practical approach, and supportive faculty. Minor suggestions for improvement were noted in placement support.
I have started studying a master in this center. They sell you the course as something very practical that will help you find work in the chosen field. I am currently finishing my first module and I am quite disappointed. I arrived eager to learn and practice. The first two or three weeks were very good. Everyone was very cordial and friendly, and the teacher was very motivated. All that changed to the third week after they sent us a survey to give our opinion about the course, the teacher and the school. This teacher is very unmotivated and does not follow his own curriculum. We are a week away from finishing the course and we have not given all the material that is requested to carry out the project, and many classes are based on comparing other web pages with theirs or criticizing people who are dedicated to creating websites. They have also put me a lot of problems in the secretariat. If you are going to enroll in this school, since it is cheaper than many others, keep in mind that if you do not ask for the labor guarantee, they will NOT inform you about it. And if you sign it, you have to do it before you start the classes. Many people did not know that and they have lost it. Also if you are subject to the labor guarantee you have a number of days left, if you spend that day even if you have proof you lose the labor guarantee. I want to think that things will improve with the next module and that there will be other more professional and dedicated teachers. At the moment this is my opinion. If you are thinking about enrolling in CEI, review all the clauses before paying. They will not refund your money under any circumstances.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
1. Kindly note, it is a registered private school only, but the degrees are school-issued, not officially recognized Swiss university degrees. They are relying on the entry-tier US accreditor ACBSP itself, which is well below AACSB/EQUIS/AMBA/HEdA accreditation. So please do not be confused thinking it is a proper Swiss university. 2. Actually the school is more like a small company only, having less than 5 staff members on site. And one thing I must tell, before enrollment they are very friendly, but after joining the friendliness is finishing. 3. In the classes there are hardly 5 students at master's and bachelor's level, and many times nobody is even coming to the campus. On top of that, the teachers/staffs seemed to get fired in the middle of the semester itself. 4. One more important thing , the grades are coming from the the founder or staffs directly, very subjective and no transparency at all. The professors are not even having the right to decide the final grade!! How can this be acceptable, I am asking? 5. Now they have started selling online courses also. So I will not be surprised if one fine day they are closing the campus fully and doing only online business.
Nothing to show
To anyone who is about to consider going to Polimoda, don’t. I was due to go there to pursue my Master’s in October 2020. However, it got postponed due to Covid, and I am glad it did. I realized that the management had withheld information from me about the course requirements. Plus, they had also started giving out 50% scholarships to those who were applying much later than I did, for the same course year. Besides withholding information and behaving erratically about money, the school’s management stopped responding to my concerns. I sent a request seeking to withdraw my admission and was met with no response. I reached out to the Italian Consulate to assist me, and upon their questioning, the management stated that they had always been in touch with me. They are unprofessional, unethical, and raise serious questions about the quality (and legitimacy) of the school.
Nothing to show