ESCI School of International Studies vs Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona - UAB vs La Salle U.R.L. vs Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya - UPC vs Neuro Business School - NBS
Side-by-side comparison from 380 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Friendly, responsive, and qualified faculty
- +Engaging and enjoyable classes with up-to-date programs
- +Strong community and diverse, inclusive campus environment
- +Excellent academic quality and specialized instructors
- +Supportive professors and positive campus environment
- +Valuable resources and opportunities for personal/professional growth
- +International environment and diverse cultures
- +Engaging, proactive, and technology-focused learning methods
- +Strong academic content and knowledgeable faculty
- +Excellent teaching quality and helpful professors.
- +Vibrant campus life and diverse extracurricular activities.
- +Supportive environment with good student welfare and flexible academic options.
- +Practical, creative, and engaging learning approach
- +Inspiring and supportive teachers with real-world business insights
- +Strong academic programs with global perspectives
- +Flexible courses & supportive teachers
- +Career advancement & internship opportunities
- +Personal and professional growth
- +Welcoming and safe community
- +Excellent instructors and support
- +Relevant and up-to-date curriculum
- -Disorganized and unclear teaching with lack of individual attention.
- -Program or course content is not as advertised or challenging as expected.
- -Administrative and management issues within the school.
- -Poor teaching quality and unsupportive faculty are a major concern.
- -Substandard facilities, including moldy housing and unreliable WiFi, detract from the student experience.
- -Lack of clear academic feedback and excessive class cancellations hinder learning.
- -Outdated curriculum and outdated facilities.
- -Administrative and management issues are prevalent.
- -Lack of forward-thinking and innovative educational approach.
- -Excessive difficulty and perceived unfairness in grading contribute to student dissatisfaction.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Poor value for money regarding class hours.
- -Disappointing overall experience not meeting expectations.
- -Outdated course content and lack of practical training.
- -Poor communication and a feeling of being scammed.
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
- -Lack of support and communication from instructors is disappointing.
This institution garners strong marks across most metrics. Professors and facilities stand out as particular strengths, both exceeding a 4.4 rating. Student life also scores well, alongside location and perceived value. The weakest area identified is internationality, scoring just above 4.0, with accommodation also receiving a lower, though still respectable, score of 4.2.
A well-rounded university experience is reflected in these ratings. Student Life stands out as the strongest area, receiving the highest score. Among the areas with slightly lower scores, Accommodation is rated the weakest, though still well within a positive range. Other categories like Facilities, Professors, Location, Internationality, and Value all received solid marks, indicating a generally positive perception of the university.
Outstanding scores are evident for this university's **Location** (5), **Facilities** (4.67), and **Student Life** (4.67). Conversely, the **Professors** category received the lowest rating at 3.33. Other areas like Accomodation (4.33), Internationality (4), and Value (4) are rated positively.
Across a range of surveyed categories, this university demonstrates strong performance, particularly excelling in **Value** with a rating of 4.09. **Professors** also received a high mark at 3.97. Conversely, the **Location** and **Internationality** scores are relatively lower, both hovering around 3.75, indicating these areas might be considered for improvement. Overall, the institution maintains a solid standing in its facilities, student life, and accommodation.
The institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in its internationality, with a notable 4.79 rating. Professors also receive high marks at 4.74, and value for money is strong at 4.68. Areas for potential improvement include location and accommodation, both rated at 4.375, representing the lowest scores among the surveyed categories.
A review of this university reveals a mixed but generally positive assessment. Its strongest areas are Student Life and Internationality, both scoring around 3.67. Facilities, Location, and Accommodation received a solid 3, while Professors and Value landed slightly higher at approximately 3.33.
This institution receives particularly high marks for **Internationality** (4.92) and **Location** (4.83), indicating a vibrant global presence and desirable setting. **Facilities** and **Accomodation** also score very well at 4.5. **Value** is rated as the comparatively weakest area at 4.25, though still a respectable score. Professors and student life also maintain strong ratings.
With a 4.46/5 average, ~96% of reviews are positive, praising fun learning, qualified faculty, and community. A small ~4% of feedback notes disorganization and unclear expectations.
Approximately 95.5% of reviews are positive, highlighting good academic reputation, supportive professors, and positive campus environments. A small percentage of feedback notes issues with teaching quality and facilities.
Nearly 83% of reviews are positive, highlighting internationality, relevant projects, and technology focus. One review (~17%) criticizes outdated architectural programs and facilities.
Nearly all (99%) of the 94 reviews are positive, highlighting helpful teachers, good academic explanations, and excellent extracurricular activities. A small amount of feedback (1%) mentioned a perceived focus on difficulty over quality.
Nearly all reviews are positive, highlighting engaging, creative learning with practical projects and inspiring teachers. A small percentage of feedback expressed dissatisfaction with the value of full-time programs.
With an average rating of 3.67/5 from 3 reviews, approximately 67% of feedback is positive, highlighting career advancement, internships, and effective teaching. About 33% of feedback expressed disappointment with communication and outdated course content.
University students give very positive reviews, with ~83% rating 4-5 stars. They praise welcoming culture, excellent instructors, and effective job placement support. No negative feedback was recorded.
ESCI es una escuela de negocios seria, donde existe un contacto cercano entre el alumno y el profesor. Disponen de una alta variedad de clases donde en algunos casos, si es cierto que necesitan terminar de pulir el temario para que resulte mas práctico y aplicable al ámbito laboral. Pero, en la mayoría de casos, ofrecen un temario exigente, riguroso, y una alta calidad de docencia. La escuela es pequeña, por lo que no siempre da la sensación de estar viviendo la experiencia universitaria, pero a la vez esto resulta en un muy agradable ambiente entre los estudiantes. Los puntos fuertes en mi opinión se resumen en: el programa de idiomas, el programa de prácticas, las buenas intalaciones y la gran valoración que tiene el título de negocios y marketing en el mercado.
I studied tourism at UAB for one semester in 2022. I was supposed to stay for a full year, but my experience wasn't good and I left after the first semester. First of all, the housing area (Villa universitária) has mold. I was sick constantly during my exhange and went through multiple respiratory infections. I also had almost daily headaches and a very painful and strong cough. All of this eased after a couple weeks once I returned to my home country. Other exhange students told me about having the same issues and some noticed mold in their apartment walls. The housing area at times is very unsave and not controlled properly. The tourism faculty is located in the same building with the housing area reception. Therefore, it was very excluded from the rest of the campus. That's why, I didn't really get to use any of the services offered at the campus or get a real university experience. UAB also has a medical centre for "all students" according to their website, yet this doesn't include tourism students. I was turned away from the centre despite being extremely sick once they heard I study tourism at the school. The classes focused more on remembering as much information as you can to pass the exam, rather than focusing on understanding, critical thinking etc. The teachers were very often late to classes, they felt very unmotivated and I received very little feedback. In short, I do not recommend UAB. My experience was a loss of money and time.
Nothing to show
As a student of the UPC, it must be said that at the level of studies and teaching staff, both the one I have had as well as friends and acquaintances, is excellent. However, as far as facilities are concerned, it leaves much to be desired, and given the university's debt, small (and historical) faculties, such as the nautical one, are negatively affected by each management.
The classes are so intresting I love how they they teach you about psychology and business strategy, I really like how the teachers are real professionals in terms of marketing , buisness... overall I really enjoy it.
I genuinely wish I could leave a positive review about Hospitality Academy, but unfortunately, my experience has been incredibly disappointing and feels like a scam. They promised a hospitality certificate program with proper classes and training. I attended the first class, and after that—nothing. No follow-up, no new classes, and the content they provided was completely outdated, with videos from as far back as 2008. What’s worse is the complete lack of communication. I’ve reached out more than ten times via email and received no response. I also contacted my supposed advisor multiple times, and again—nothing. This level of unprofessionalism is unacceptable, especially from a company claiming to help professionals grow in the hospitality industry. I do not recommend this program to anyone. If you're serious about your education, go directly with accredited universities. It will save you time, money, and a lot of frustration.
Nothing to show
