California State University - CSU vs Hult International Business School vs San Francisco State University- SF State vs University of San Francisco vs Minerva Schools at KGI
Side-by-side comparison from 172 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive and expert professors
- +Rigorous and informative courses
- +Positive and transformative academic experience
- +Strong career services and networking opportunities
- +Practical, hands-on learning with experienced faculty
- +Diverse international environment and global alumni network
- +Excellent and supportive faculty
- +Diverse and inclusive environment
- +Relevant and challenging programs
- +Engaging instructors and supportive advisors
- +Real-world learning and career opportunities
- +Vibrant campus and urban environment
- +Innovative curriculum and problem-solving skills development
- +Diverse, global experiences and intercultural immersion
- +Engaging, discussion-based classes and supportive faculty
Nothing to show
- +Accessible and engaging online learning with supportive instructors.
- +Concise lectures and expert guidance foster knowledge development.
- +Well-designed programs that challenge and reward students.
- -Lack of adequate academic and administrative guidance.
- -Perceived focus on profit over student well-being and support.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Administrative and management issues are prevalent.
- -Facility quality and professor standards are inconsistent.
- -Admission standards are perceived as too low.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common complaints.
- -Lack of resources and support hinders academic progress.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Course content is perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning and comfort.
- -Lack of clear communication and feedback creates uncertainty.
Nothing to show
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a major concern.
- -Poor communication and administrative issues create frustration.
- -A lack of practical and relevant course content is disappointing.
This institution demonstrates strong performance, particularly in the "Value" category, achieving a high rating of 4.36. "Professors" also received excellent feedback, scoring 4.32. Conversely, "Student Life" garnered the lowest rating at 4.15, representing the weakest area among the surveyed aspects. Overall, the university presents a generally positive image across its facilities, location, accommodation, and internationality.
This university garners impressive scores, particularly in **Internationality** (4.77) and **Location** (4.58). Professors also receive high marks at 4.47. Facilities, Student Life, and Value are all rated favorably above 4.0. The weakest area is **Accomodation**, scoring significantly lower at 3.25, indicating a potential area for improvement.
This institution demonstrates remarkable strengths in several key areas. Internationality received the highest score, closely followed by excellent ratings for Professors and Value. Student Life, while still positive, appears to be the relatively weakest area compared to others, though it remains a solid score. Facilities and Accommodation also received favorable marks.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its academic offerings, with **professors** and **location** both receiving excellent scores. Student life, accommodation, and internationality are also well-regarded. The **value** for money, however, represents the lowest-rated aspect among the surveyed categories, suggesting an area for potential improvement.
An analysis of university ratings reveals outstanding strengths in Location and Internationality, both receiving perfect scores. Professors and Value also demonstrate exceptional performance. Areas for potential improvement include Facilities, scoring 4.2, and Accomodation, which earned a rating of 4. Student Life received a solid rating of 4.33. Overall, the university presents a highly positive profile.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in several key areas, boasting perfect scores for its Facilities, Professors, Student Life, Internationality, and overall Value. Conversely, it receives zero ratings for Location and Accommodation, indicating these aspects may require significant improvement or are not provided by the university.
Nearly all (98.5%) of 67 reviews are positive, highlighting informative courses and supportive professors. A few reviews mentioned parking challenges. One negative review cited guidance issues and school priorities.
Approximately 95.4% of 65 reviews are positive, highlighting networking, job opportunities, practical learning, and supportive faculty. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions issues with staff competence and course materials.
Nearly all (100%) of six reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Recurring positive themes include dynamic curricula, supportive and knowledgeable faculty, and an inclusive, diverse environment.
The University of San Francisco receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~96% of reviews being 4-5 stars. Students praise the urban setting, experiential learning, supportive instructors, and vibrant campus life. Career opportunities and the city's integration into education are frequently highlighted.
All reviews are positive, averaging 4.83 stars. Students highlight innovative curriculum and engaging, discussion-based classes, along with an exceptional global rotation program offering worldwide travel and cultural immersion.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 5/5 and ~100% positive feedback, students praise the convenient and challenging online curriculum. They highlight concise lectures, clear instructions, and supportive instructors promoting skill development and knowledge progression.
Nothing to show
One of my favourite aspects about Hult is its diversity. By meeting people from all over the world with diverse histories and customs, you can get a sense of what their home nations are like. I also enjoy the help the staff provides every step of the way.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Minerva University is a very diverse college with students from over 60 countries across the world. The classes are discussion based rather than lecture based, where students engage their professors in class based on the materials they read before class. Minerva’s global rotation program in which students study at a different country every semester, helps prepare them to be global citizens through the projects they take on and experiences they acquire in each country and prepares them for the job market.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
