ESERP Business School vs Université Tahri Mohamed Béchar - UTMB vs University of Manila - UDM vs University of Economics in Bratislava vs The Event School London

Side-by-side comparison from 114 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: IMM Graduate School (5.00)
ESERP Business School: wins 0/6 categories
Université Tahri Mohamed Béchar - UTMB: wins 1/6 categories
University of Manila - UDM: wins 0/6 categories
University of Economics in Bratislava: wins 0/6 categories
The Event School London: wins 0/6 categories
Pan African University Institute of Water And Energy Sciences - PAUWES: wins 4/6 categories
IMM Graduate School: wins 1/6 categories
Comparing
Barcelona, Spain
3.90
Read more reviews
97 reviews
×
Best programme: Marketing
Best programme: Applied Human Sciences
Best programme: Computer Application
Best programme: Business Administration and Management
London, The United Kingdom
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Durban, South Africa
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Business and Marketing
Category ratings
Facilities
3.87
3.00
2.50
3.00
Not rated
4.67
5.00
Win
Location
4.76
3.00
2.00
4.50
Not rated
4.78
Win
4.00
Professors
3.94
5.00
Win
4.00
3.50
Not rated
4.89
4.00
Internationality
4.09
3.00
2.50
2.00
Not rated
4.78
Win
4.50
Student life
2.68
4.00
2.50
3.50
Not rated
4.44
Win
4.00
Value
3.71
5.00
3.50
3.00
Not rated
4.78
5.00
Accommodation
3.02
2.00
3.00
2.50
Not rated
4.67
Win
4.50
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical learning & real-world application
  • +Strong marketing & business programmes
  • +Supportive environment & professional development
  • +Excellent study conditions and depth of study
  • +Strong medical programs and specializations
  • +Innovative and forward-thinking approach to student development
  • +Welcoming and supportive campus environment with accessible faculty
  • +Strong academic standards and scholarship opportunities
  • +Wide program selection in the capital.
  • +Progressive teaching methods used by some instructors.
  • +Business Management program valued for practical usefulness.

Nothing to show

  • +High-quality, specialized education with global faculty.
  • +Diverse networking and cultural exchange opportunities.
  • +Development-focused programs addressing African challenges.
  • +Experienced and qualified tutors
  • +Flexible study options allowing work-life balance
  • +Relevant and competitive course modules
Cons
  • -Poor management, organization, and academic support.
  • -Outdated and low-quality facilities.
  • -Deceptive marketing and unclear policies regarding student work.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology are prevalent.
  • -Inconsistent instruction and lack of instructor availability cause frustration.
  • -Administrative inefficiencies and poor communication create significant obstacles.
  • -Lack of qualified professors and insufficient facilities.
  • -Overload of redundant subjects and lackluster programs.
  • -Minimal competitive program activities.
  • -Unengaging and outdated academic content.
  • -Lack of practical application and international opportunities.

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources.
  • -Poor communication and inefficient administrative processes.
  • -Limited career support and unclear academic guidance.
  • -Poor communication and administrative problems are frequent frustrations.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of necessary resources are a consistent complaint.
  • -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or not well-suited to industry needs.
Rating summary
What students say

This university receives excellent marks for its **location**, achieving a near-perfect score. **Internationality** also stands out as a strength. Conversely, **student life** is identified as the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating. While **facilities**, **professors**, and **value** are all rated well, **accommodation** is considered average.

An overview of university ratings indicates a strong emphasis on academic quality, with professors and value both receiving perfect scores. Conversely, accommodation presents the most significant area for improvement, rated considerably lower than other aspects. Facilities and internationality are mid-range, while student life offers a positive experience.

Analyzing the provided ratings reveals a university with distinct strengths and areas for improvement. Professors achieve a notably high score of 4, indicating excellent academic guidance. Conversely, the location and facilities are the weakest points, each scoring a low 2. Student life and internationality also receive moderate ratings of 2.5, while accommodation and value for money present a more favorable picture with scores of 3 and 3.5 respectively.

Performance is particularly strong in location, receiving a high rating. Conversely, accommodation and internationality represent areas needing significant improvement, indicated by lower scores. Overall, the university presents a mixed profile with average ratings in facilities, professors, student life, and value.

Nothing to show

Overall, this university garners strong evaluations, particularly excelling in the quality of its professors, who received a near-perfect score. Location, internationality, and value are also highly regarded. While student life received the lowest rating, it remains a solid score, with facilities and accommodation also performing very well.

This institution garners exceptional ratings, particularly excelling in its facilities and overall value, both receiving a perfect score. Student life, location, accommodation, and internationality are also strong points, all scoring 4 or 4.5 out of 5. The professors are the lowest-rated area, though still solid with a 4, indicating a generally positive and well-rounded university experience.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting useful knowledge and good courses. A smaller portion (~8.3%) mentions poor organization and low-quality facilities.

This university has excellent doctors and study conditions. Students praised the depth of study and various specializations. The feedback is overwhelmingly positive, with a 4/5 average rating and ~0% negative sentiment.

Two out of three reviews are positive, highlighting innovation, a good learning environment, and competitive programs. One review expressed concerns about qualified professors and facilities.

Reviews are split, with a 3/5 average rating. Approximately 50% of feedback is negative, highlighting a need for modernized teaching and more practical, international projects. Positive comments mention the capital location and program variety.

Nothing to show

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with a 4.89 average rating from 9 feedback instances. Students highlight high-quality education, international professors, networking opportunities across Africa, and a welcoming, conducive learning environment. No negative feedback was recorded.

With a 5/5 average rating from two reviews, students praise the university for qualified tutors and flexible study options that allow balancing life and work. There is no negative feedback.

Rating distribution
5★
27%
0%
0%
0%
0%
89%
100%
4★
46%
100%
67%
50%
0%
11%
0%
3★
18%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
6%
0%
33%
50%
0%
0%
0%
1★
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Not bad

I have completed my Marketing Degree at ESERP x Staffordshire program. It was useful, close to reality. The majority of professors were professional, except one who was constantly late for classes like 1 hour. After I complained about it, the situation got better, although my anonymity was not kept as it was promised, so do not believe that you can make anonymous complains - everything will be revealed.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close