Universidad de Málaga vs Université des Antilles vs Universidad Nacional de Piura - UNP vs King Abdulaziz University - KAU vs The Golf School of Excellence

Side-by-side comparison from 73 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: King Abdulaziz University - KAU (4.80)
Universidad de Málaga: wins 0/7 categories
Université des Antilles: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad Nacional de Piura - UNP: wins 0/7 categories
King Abdulaziz University - KAU: wins 3/7 categories
The Golf School of Excellence: wins 1/7 categories
Darussalam Gontor University - UNIDA: wins 3/7 categories
Capilano University - CapU: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Marketing and Management
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
4.80
Top
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Commerce and Media (PR)
Cape Town, South Africa
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Sports Science
Best programme: Arabic Language and Culture
North Vancouver, Canada
4.30
Read more reviews
7 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration
Category ratings
Facilities
3.98
Not rated
Not rated
4.25
Win
4.00
4.00
4.14
Location
4.15
Not rated
Not rated
4.50
Win
4.00
4.33
4.14
Professors
3.60
Not rated
Not rated
4.75
4.00
5.00
Win
4.14
Internationality
4.08
Not rated
Not rated
4.25
5.00
Win
4.67
4.00
Student life
4.23
Not rated
Not rated
4.75
Win
4.00
4.67
3.71
Value
3.70
Not rated
Not rated
4.25
4.00
4.67
Win
4.14
Accommodation
3.28
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
4.00
4.33
Win
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Dedicated and approachable professors
  • +Positive campus atmosphere and student life
  • +Solid academic programs and practical application

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Strong academic programs and qualified faculty
  • +Access to resources, practical applications, and research opportunities
  • +Supportive teaching staff and good communication channels
  • +Pursuing golf career dreams while studying
  • +Earning a recognized PGA Diploma
  • +Rigorous training for professional competition
  • +Holistic curriculum and boarding system fostering community and skill development
  • +Supportive lecturers providing guidance and engaging in discussions
  • +Integrated daily activities and student management opportunities
  • +Supportive professors and small classes
  • +Practical, hands-on learning and career preparation
  • +Positive peer interactions and community building
Cons
  • -Unmotivated teachers and difficult exams are a common complaint.
  • -Degrees lack practical application and real-world relevance.
  • -The university is not recommended for those seeking a challenging academic experience.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a problem.
  • -Course content and teaching quality are often disappointing.
  • -Administrative and management issues create frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a constant problem.
  • -Inflexible academic policies hinder student progress.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a recurring complaint.
  • -Limited student support and unclear communication create difficulties.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources frustrate students.
  • -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or not effectively delivered.
Rating summary
What students say

Student feedback highlights a university with notable strengths and areas for improvement. Student life and location are particularly well-received, boasting the highest ratings. Accommodations, however, represent the weakest area, receiving the lowest score. The university also performs well in internationality and facilities, while professors and overall value fall within the average range.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in its **Professors** and **Student Life**, both receiving a high score of 4.75. Areas like **Location** also performed very well at 4.5. While still strong, **Accomodation** is the comparatively lowest-rated category at 4.0, suggesting potential for improvement in this specific aspect. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded and positively reviewed environment.

This institution presents a remarkably consistent performance, with a perfect score for internationality distinguishing it as a key strength. Most other aspects, including facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, and overall value, are rated highly at 4 out of 5. This suggests a well-rounded and desirable university experience, with international engagement being a particular standout feature.

This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in student life, internationality, and value, all receiving high marks. Professors are also rated very favorably. The weakest area, though still good, is facilities. Location and accommodation present a solid, mid-to-high performance. Overall, the university offers a well-rounded experience with particular advantages in its vibrant student environment and global appeal.

This university demonstrates considerable strength in several key areas, with consistent high ratings of 4.14 for Facilities, Professors, Location, and Value. Student Life also scores well at 3.71, and Internationality is rated at 4. The lowest-rated aspect is Accommodation, receiving a score of 3. Overall, the institution appears to excel in its core academic and locational offerings.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 3.74 average rating from 58 reviews, ~58% highlight positive academic experiences and a good atmosphere. A small ~3.5% of feedback points to unmotivated teachers and a lack of practical application.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

All four reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.75/5. Students highlight academic excellence, qualified faculty, and comprehensive programs. No negative feedback was reported.

The single review is positive, with a 4/5 average rating. This feedback suggests a strong student experience, focusing on achieving career aspirations in the golf industry.

With an average rating of 4.33/5, all three reviews are positive (~100%). Recurring themes highlight the campus's superior curriculum, dormitory system, and active lecturers. Students appreciate the holistic daily activities and opportunities for communication and skill development.

With an average rating of 4.29/5, ~93% of reviews are positive. Students praise passionate professors, practical learning, and a supportive atmosphere. Limited social opportunities outside of specific programs are a minor concern.

Rating distribution
5★
21%
0%
0%
75%
0%
33%
43%
4★
36%
0%
0%
25%
100%
67%
43%
3★
40%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
14%
2★
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Cultural diversity

It is a university that brings together many exchange students, you could say more than 700 people. Therefore there is the possibility of generating an approach with different cultures and meeting people. The problem is that the university does not understand that a foreign person does not know anything about the university and they should provide information regarding all types, explaining how the schedules are chosen, what the internship process is like, what apps or websites they use, etc. .

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

central of excellence

the campus with boarding school program, have panca jiwa and panca jangka. the pesantren model brings us to the holistic daily activity as a student to be involved in student management in tarbiyah or education knowledge.

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close