Norwegian University of Science and Technology - NTNU vs BPP University vs BI Norwegian Business School - BI vs NHH Norwegian School of Economics vs Future London Academy
Side-by-side comparison from 44 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +strong academic programs & practical exposure
- +vibrant social life & student organizations
- +knowledgeable professors & engaging lectures
- +Industry-focused, practical education with career relevance
- +Expert faculty and well-structured, professional guidance
- +Accessible learning facilities and responsive support
- +Knowledgeable lecturers and strong academic environment
- +Practical approach and industry connections
- +Good location and food variety
- +Free tuition and diverse program options
- +High quality education and international exchange opportunities
- +Supportive environment and welcoming community
Nothing to show
- +Insightful understanding of Norwegian welfare model
- +Exploration of universalism, public sector strength, and social solidarity
- +Balance of economic competitiveness and social protection
Nothing to show
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are frustrating.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and unhelpful instructors are a major concern.
- -Administrative and management issues create unnecessary obstacles and stress.
- -Administrative and communication issues are prevalent.
- -Outdated facilities and poor value for money are significant concerns.
- -Coursework relevance and lack of practical examples are disappointing.
- -Students dislike the lack of proper support and communication from staff.
- -They often complain about outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources.
- -Students express frustration with the curriculum and teaching methods being unengaging or irrelevant.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring concern.
- -Poor teaching quality and curriculum relevance are often criticized.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning and comfort.
- -The curriculum lacks depth and practical application.
Nothing to show
This institution garners strong approval, particularly in student life, its strongest area. Facilities and location also receive high marks. Conversely, internationality stands out as the weakest point among the evaluated aspects. Accommodation, professors, and overall value are rated positively, indicating a generally well-regarded university experience.
Considering the provided ratings, the university excels in its location and internationality, both scoring above 4.1. Professors and perceived value also received favorable scores around 4.0 and 3.8 respectively. Conversely, accommodation stands out as the weakest area with a score of 2.8, and student life also received a comparatively lower rating of 3.14. Facilities are rated moderately at 3.59.
This institution demonstrates remarkable strengths, with exceptional ratings for its Facilities, Professors, and Location, all scoring an impressive 4.5. Student Life and Internationality also receive solid marks at 4. However, Accommodations and Value emerge as areas needing development, each receiving a lower score of 3.
This institution receives exceptionally high marks for its facilities and accommodation, both scoring an outstanding 4.7. Professors and internationality are also strong points, with ratings of 4.4. Student life and value for money are rated at 4.3 and 4.1 respectively. The university's location is its weakest area, though still a respectable 4.1.
Nothing to show
Remarkably, this institution achieved a perfect score of 5 out of 5 in every evaluated category. The facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value are all considered outstanding. There are no apparent weak areas, as all aspects of the university have been rated at the highest possible level.
Nothing to show
With a 4.44/5 average from 9 reviews, ~89% are positive. Students highlight excellent education and social life, especially for engineering. No negative feedback was provided.
~74% of 25 reviews are positive, highlighting quality professional education, strong industry links, and flexible study. A small percentage of reviews mention issues with information accuracy and coursework relevance.
With an average rating of 4/5, student feedback is highly positive. Reviewers consistently praise the great location, knowledgeable lecturers, and strong academic environment. Industry connections and a practical approach to education were also highlighted.
Reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~0% negative feedback. Students praise the free tuition and wide range of masters specializations, highlighting a conducive academic and diverse environment.
Nothing to show
Based on one review, the university received a perfect 5/5 rating. Positive feedback (~100%) highlights a comprehensive understanding of the Norwegian welfare model.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
BPP University is second to none in delivering quality education and educational services that meet the world's best standards. It excels in all the following areas and even much more. -Offers relevant and highly sought-after courses -Detailed and rich module contents -Blended learning delivery styles -Accessible Campuses with world-class learning facilities -Accessible and responsive Tutors -Tutors are experts in their various fields -Rich and continuously updated library system -Availability of career development plans for after study -Top-notch program support Team -Available expert and Professional career consultants to guide in the right direction. I recommend BPP university to anyone who wishes to have an enriching and worthwhile experience while achieving their learning goals.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
