Norwegian University of Science and Technology - NTNU vs Waterford Institute of Technology - WIT vs BI Norwegian Business School - BI vs NHH Norwegian School of Economics vs Bahia State University - UNEB
Side-by-side comparison from 26 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +strong academic programs & practical exposure
- +vibrant social life & student organizations
- +knowledgeable professors & engaging lectures
- +Supportive and helpful tutors
- +Valuable educational and practical knowledge
- +Positive peer recommendations
- +Knowledgeable lecturers and strong academic environment
- +Practical approach and industry connections
- +Good location and food variety
- +Free tuition and diverse program options
- +High quality education and international exchange opportunities
- +Supportive environment and welcoming community
- +Accessible, affordable education with excellent faculty.
- +Convenient location and transportation options.
- +Emphasis on diversity and student support services.
- +Insightful understanding of Norwegian welfare model
- +Exploration of universalism, public sector strength, and social solidarity
- +Balance of economic competitiveness and social protection
Nothing to show
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are frustrating.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and unhelpful instructors are a major concern.
- -Administrative and management issues create unnecessary obstacles and stress.
- -Administrative and management issues, including timetable changes and unorganized lecturers.
- -Outdated facilities and poor infrastructure like unreliable WiFi and non-functional printers.
- -Lack of engagement with students not on the main campus and shifting academic requirements.
- -Students dislike the lack of proper support and communication from staff.
- -They often complain about outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources.
- -Students express frustration with the curriculum and teaching methods being unengaging or irrelevant.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring concern.
- -Poor teaching quality and curriculum relevance are often criticized.
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
- -Overcrowded classrooms and lack of personal attention are common complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning and comfort.
- -The curriculum lacks depth and practical application.
Nothing to show
This institution garners strong approval, particularly in student life, its strongest area. Facilities and location also receive high marks. Conversely, internationality stands out as the weakest point among the evaluated aspects. Accommodation, professors, and overall value are rated positively, indicating a generally well-regarded university experience.
This institution demonstrates a solid overall performance, with notable strengths in **Student Life** (3.75) and **Professors** (3.75). **Location** also receives a positive score (3.525). Conversely, areas requiring attention include **Internationality** (3.025) and **Facilities** (3.125), which received the lowest ratings among the surveyed categories. Accommodations and value are rated moderately.
This institution demonstrates remarkable strengths, with exceptional ratings for its Facilities, Professors, and Location, all scoring an impressive 4.5. Student Life and Internationality also receive solid marks at 4. However, Accommodations and Value emerge as areas needing development, each receiving a lower score of 3.
This institution receives exceptionally high marks for its facilities and accommodation, both scoring an outstanding 4.7. Professors and internationality are also strong points, with ratings of 4.4. Student life and value for money are rated at 4.3 and 4.1 respectively. The university's location is its weakest area, though still a respectable 4.1.
This university presents a well-rounded profile, with exceptionally strong ratings in **Location** and **Student Life**, both scoring a high 4.67. **Professors** also receive excellent marks, matching **Student Life** at 4.33, alongside a commendable **Value** score. Areas for improvement include **Internationality**, which is the weakest category at 3.33, and **Facilities** and **Accomodation**, both rated at 3.67.
Remarkably, this institution achieved a perfect score of 5 out of 5 in every evaluated category. The facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value are all considered outstanding. There are no apparent weak areas, as all aspects of the university have been rated at the highest possible level.
Nothing to show
With a 4.44/5 average from 9 reviews, ~89% are positive. Students highlight excellent education and social life, especially for engineering. No negative feedback was provided.
University reviews are generally positive (~75%), with students appreciating helpful tutors and relevant course content. A small portion (~25%) of feedback notes issues with timetable changes, disorganization, and poor facilities.
With an average rating of 4/5, student feedback is highly positive. Reviewers consistently praise the great location, knowledgeable lecturers, and strong academic environment. Industry connections and a practical approach to education were also highlighted.
Reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~0% negative feedback. Students praise the free tuition and wide range of masters specializations, highlighting a conducive academic and diverse environment.
The university is praised for its excellent professors, Accounting program, and commitment to diversity. Positive feedback also highlights convenient location and ample parking. Some students mentioned affordable tuition for public institutions.
Based on one review, the university received a perfect 5/5 rating. Positive feedback (~100%) highlights a comprehensive understanding of the Norwegian welfare model.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
