CETT Barcelona School of Tourism, Hospitality and Gastronomy vs BI Norwegian Business School - BI vs University of Bergen vs NHH Norwegian School of Economics vs University of Kyrenia
Side-by-side comparison from 24 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Diverse international student community
- +Valuable education in tourism and related fields
- +Positive living experience in Barcelona
- +Knowledgeable lecturers and strong academic environment
- +Practical approach and industry connections
- +Good location and food variety
- +Excellent academic programs and knowledgeable professors
- +Strong student support services and welfare provisions
- +Vibrant international community and city-integrated campus life
- +Free tuition and diverse program options
- +High quality education and international exchange opportunities
- +Supportive environment and welcoming community
- +Diverse international community and cultural experiences
- +Hands-on academic guidance and personal support
- +Academic excellence and practical learning
- +Highly qualified and encouraging teachers
- +Safe, disciplined, and motivating campus environment
- +Flexible online format and structure
- +Career-focused and practical learning
- +Supportive instructors and engaging lectures
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from faculty and staff is a major concern.
- -Students dislike the lack of proper support and communication from staff.
- -They often complain about outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources.
- -Students express frustration with the curriculum and teaching methods being unengaging or irrelevant.
- -Outdated or problematic lecture streaming software hinders communication with instructors.
- -Administrative and management issues create a frustrating student experience.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring concern.
- -Poor teaching quality and curriculum relevance are often criticized.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Ineffective teaching and curriculum delivery lead to student dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are frequently criticized.
- -Poor communication and a perceived lack of support negatively impact the student experience.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
- -Lack of clear communication and support creates a negative student experience.
With an overall positive assessment, the university particularly excels in Student Life and Internationality, both scoring 4.67. Facilities, Professors, and Location are also rated highly at 4.33. Areas with the lowest scores, though still solid, are Accomodation and Value, each receiving a rating of 4. The university demonstrates a robust offering, with particular strengths in its vibrant student community and global outlook.
This institution demonstrates remarkable strengths, with exceptional ratings for its Facilities, Professors, and Location, all scoring an impressive 4.5. Student Life and Internationality also receive solid marks at 4. However, Accommodations and Value emerge as areas needing development, each receiving a lower score of 3.
This institution demonstrates excellent performance, with student life and location receiving the highest marks at approximately 4.43 and 4.33 respectively. Facilities, accommodation, and internationality are all rated a solid 4. Professors represent the weakest area, scoring 3.86. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded experience, with particular strengths in its vibrant student community and convenient setting.
This institution receives exceptionally high marks for its facilities and accommodation, both scoring an outstanding 4.7. Professors and internationality are also strong points, with ratings of 4.4. Student life and value for money are rated at 4.3 and 4.1 respectively. The university's location is its weakest area, though still a respectable 4.1.
Receiving excellent marks across multiple facets, this institution excels in its Facilities, Professors, Location, and Internationality, all earning a perfect score of 5. Areas showing good but not perfect performance include Student Life, Accommodation, and Value, with ratings of 4. The university presents a very strong overall offering, with only minor areas for potential improvement.
This institution presents a well-rounded academic and student experience, with a perfect score for its location. Facilities, professors, student life, accommodation, and overall value all received solid 4-star ratings. The weakest area noted is internationality, which scored a 3. This suggests a strong, generally positive environment with room for growth in global engagement.
This institution demonstrates significant strengths in **Professors** and **Internationality**, both receiving top scores of 4.5. **Value** also stands out at a high 4.5. Conversely, **Location** received the lowest rating at 3. The remaining areas of Facilities, Student Life, and Accommodation are rated solidly at 3.5, indicating a generally positive, though not exceptional, experience in these aspects.
With an average rating of 4.25/5 from four reviews, ~75% of feedback is positive. Students highlight satisfaction with language immersion and diverse nationalities, finding it a great choice for tourism and F&B education.
With an average rating of 4/5, student feedback is highly positive. Reviewers consistently praise the great location, knowledgeable lecturers, and strong academic environment. Industry connections and a practical approach to education were also highlighted.
With a 4.14/5 average, reviews are overwhelmingly positive, highlighting a good learning environment and student welfare services. A small percentage (~14.3%) of feedback mentioned issues with lecture streaming software.
Reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~0% negative feedback. Students praise the free tuition and wide range of masters specializations, highlighting a conducive academic and diverse environment.
The single review is overwhelmingly positive, with ~100% of feedback being 5 stars. Students highlight a welcoming, diverse environment and supportive academic guidance.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating from one review, the university is praised for academic excellence and practical learning. Positive feedback highlights qualified teachers, real-life technical experience, and a safe, motivating campus.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Reviews highlight convenience and structure in online formats, alongside supportive instructors and career-focused, practical learning.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Having experienced University life from Africa , I was not sure what to expect when I decided to relocate and join the University of Kyrenia. It felt like a gateway to a entire different world I wanted to experience. From the multi diverse culture that allowed me to meet people from different parts of the world and experience new cultures, pick up a few new languages as well as handpicked academic advisors who are very hands on in guiding the students. It gave a personal touch that was more than I expected. The quality of education is good especially for the course I'm enrolled in being in the midst of people from different parts of the world has given me a lot of insights in the world of foreign policies and diplomacy and makes it more exciting. It took a while to settle in due to the culture shock and changes but once you adapt the place warms up to you and the Island serves you views in any corner you set your eyes on.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
